A query on frame buffers

2011-01-11 Thread Prasad Joshi
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> AMD chipset. > > They don't seem to have have any errata's for this GFX business. > But they do have a passthrough mode - hopefull that is not what you have > passed in? > >> > Since you mentioned that you were able to passthrough ot

Re: A query on frame buffers

2011-01-11 Thread Prasad Joshi
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> AMD chipset. > > They don't seem to have have any errata's for this GFX business. > But they do have a passthrough mode - hopefull that is not what you have > passed in? > >> > Since you mentioned that you were able to passthrough ot

A query on frame buffers

2011-01-10 Thread Prasad Joshi
Hello Konard, Thanks a lot for your efforts and time. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Tried your patches on Guest machine, it did not help. I am attaching >> the messages from guest machine. > > Ok, then the issue is not with the guest but the IOMMU. >> >> > well

A query on frame buffers

2011-01-10 Thread Prasad Joshi
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:47:59PM +0000, Prasad Joshi wrote: >> 2011/1/7 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : >> >> > The errors >> >> > >> >> > [ ? ?3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *

Re: A query on frame buffers

2011-01-10 Thread Prasad Joshi
Hello Konard, Thanks a lot for your efforts and time. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Tried your patches on Guest machine, it did not help. I am attaching >> the messages from guest machine. > > Ok, then the issue is not with the guest but the IOMMU. >> >> > well

Re: A query on frame buffers

2011-01-10 Thread Prasad Joshi
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:47:59PM +0000, Prasad Joshi wrote: >> 2011/1/7 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : >> >> > The errors >> >> > >> >> > [    3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *

Re: A query on frame buffers

2011-01-10 Thread Prasad Joshi
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:47:59PM +0000, Prasad Joshi wrote: >> 2011/1/7 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : >> >> > The errors >> >> > >> >> > [    3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *

A query on frame buffers

2011-01-08 Thread Prasad Joshi
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:47:59PM +0000, Prasad Joshi wrote: >> 2011/1/7 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : >> >> > The errors >> >> > >> >> > [ ? ?3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *

A query on frame buffers

2011-01-07 Thread Prasad Joshi
2011/1/7 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : >> > The errors >> > >> > [ ? ?3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed >> > (sracth(0x15E4)=0xCAFEDEAD) >> > [ ? ?3.781010] [drm:r100_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon: cp isn't working (-22). >> > [ ? ?3.782542] radeon :00:04.0: failled initializi

Re: A query on frame buffers

2011-01-07 Thread Prasad Joshi
2011/1/7 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk : >> > The errors >> > >> > [    3.778476] [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed >> > (sracth(0x15E4)=0xCAFEDEAD) >> > [    3.781010] [drm:r100_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon: cp isn't working (-22). >> > [    3.782542] radeon :00:04.0: failled initializi