Hello,
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 10:42:57 +0200
Christian Heusel wrote:
> > Any chance to see that one pushed to stable 6.10.x kernels so that we
> > can have a working console ?
>
> this is on the way as the stable team has already queued the patch for
> the (to be released) 6.10.8 stable kernel:
>
Hello,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:56:19 -0400
Zack Rusin wrote:
> Thanks! I see. I have a patch out that fixes it, but in general I
Any chance to see that one pushed to stable 6.10.x kernels so that we can
have a working console ?
Regards,
Paul
pgpFNfdfQFGon.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
Hello,
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:48:45 -0500
Doug Kehn wrote:
> Attached is a log from a BIOS system.
And a log from a UEFI VM, this test was done with 6.10.6 from el-repo.
Regards,
Paul
dmesg-6106-vmwgfx-crash.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
pgppuoan16hWp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digit
Hello,
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 19:48:47 +0200
Christian Heusel wrote:
> While we were still debugging the issue Brad (also CC'ed) messaged me
> that they were seeing similar failures in their ESXi based test
> pipelines except for one box that was running on legacy BIOS (so maybe
> that is relevant)
rror_state attached as error.gz
Best,
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense
Hello,
I've booted a few seconds ago to a freshly compiled 3.5.0-rc3 kernel, and
short after starting X + KDE, I've got :
Jun 25 19:16:58 tux kernel: [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling
back to bit banging on pin 5
in my messages.
Nothing like that before (3.4.0-vanilla), and 3.5.0
Hello,
I've booted a few seconds ago to a freshly compiled 3.5.0-rc3 kernel, and
short after starting X + KDE, I've got :
Jun 25 19:16:58 tux kernel: [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling
back to bit banging on pin 5
in my messages.
Nothing like that before (3.4.0-vanilla), and 3.5.0
which ones) or is that harmless
> > (though I doubt kernel messages about a time out are harmless ;)
>
> It's harmless in this case. Just a warning that the new hw driven method
> failed and we are now using the old CPU driven method.
OK, so I guess that me feeling the displ
Hello,
I've just booted 3.0.0-rc3 on my machine, and I got that message :
Jun 16 15:32:07 tux kernel: [drm] GMBUS timed out, falling back to bit banging
on pin 5 [i915 gmbus dpb]
I've checked my logs, and I never got that with my previous 2.6.39.1
kernel, so that looks like something new to 3.x.
Hello,
You can add a:
Tested-by: Paul Rolland
This is indeed fixing the memory leak in size-32 pool on my machine.
Thanks a lot,
Paul
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:08:36 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open/close so
> that the vma entri
Hello,
You can add a:
Tested-by: Paul Rolland
This is indeed fixing the memory leak in size-32 pool on my machine.
Thanks a lot,
Paul
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:08:36 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open/close so
> that the vma entri
Hello,
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:09:56 -0500
Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 21:08 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open/close so
> > that the vma entries are created and destroy appropriately.
> >
> > Reported-by: Matt Mackall
> >
Hello,
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:09:56 -0500
Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 21:08 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open/close so
> > that the vma entries are created and destroy appropriately.
> >
> > Reported-by: Matt Mackall
> >
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:36:18 +0200
Thomas Meyer wrote:
> On Sunday 01 August 2010 17:17:54 Roberto Oppedisano wrote:
> > On 01/08/2010 15:14, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > > My machine has :
> > > 00:02.0 0300: 8086:2a42 (rev 07)
> > > 00:02.1 038
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:36:18 +0200
Thomas Meyer wrote:
> On Sunday 01 August 2010 17:17:54 Roberto Oppedisano wrote:
> > On 01/08/2010 15:14, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > > My machine has :
> > > 00:02.0 0300: 8086:2a42 (rev 07)
> > > 00:02.1 038
Hello Thomas,
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:51:36 +0200
Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am 01.08.2010 um 13:42 schrieb Stefan Richter :
>
> > Thomas, on what hardware did you observe the regression?
>
> Is a Intel mobile express gm45 chipset.
My machine has :
00:02.0 0300: 8086:2a42 (rev 07)
00:02.1 0380: 8086
Hello Thomas,
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:51:36 +0200
Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am 01.08.2010 um 13:42 schrieb Stefan Richter :
>
> > Thomas, on what hardware did you observe the regression?
>
> Is a Intel mobile express gm45 chipset.
My machine has :
00:02.0 0300: 8086:2a42 (rev 07)
00:02.1 0380: 8086
17 matches
Mail list logo
