[PATCH/RFC] fbdev: Add FOURCC-based format configuration API

2011-06-24 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:08:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:45, Florian Tobias Schandinat > wrote: > > On 06/21/2011 10:31 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 22:49:14 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>> As FOURCC values are always 4 ASCII char

Re: [PATCH/RFC] fbdev: Add FOURCC-based format configuration API

2011-06-24 Thread Paul Mundt
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:08:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:45, Florian Tobias Schandinat > wrote: > > On 06/21/2011 10:31 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 22:49:14 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>> As FOURCC values are always 4 ASCII char

[PATCH] cleanup: Add 'struct dev' in the TTM layer to be passed in for DMA API calls.

2011-03-23 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:52:54PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Is passing a struct device to the DMA api really *strictly* necessary? > Yes. > I'd like to avoid that at all cost, since we don't want pages that are > backing buffer objects > (coherent pages) to be associated with a specific

Linux 2.6.38-rc6

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:49:21AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:56:20AM +0200, Anca Emanuel wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Anca Emanuel > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Dave Airlie > > > wrote: > > >> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 16

Re: [PATCH] cleanup: Add 'struct dev' in the TTM layer to be passed in for DMA API calls.

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:52:54PM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote: > Is passing a struct device to the DMA api really *strictly* necessary? > Yes. > I'd like to avoid that at all cost, since we don't want pages that are > backing buffer objects > (coherent pages) to be associated with a specific

Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc6

2011-03-22 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:49:21AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:56:20AM +0200, Anca Emanuel wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Anca Emanuel > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > >> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 16:54 -08

Re: [PATCH 1/3] fb: fix overlapping test off-by-one.

2010-12-27 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:29:03AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > On Die, 2010-12-21 at 11:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > From: Dave Airlie > > > > On my system with a radeon x2, the first GPU was not overlapping vesa > > but the test decided it was. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > > ---

Re: [PATCH 3/3] fbcon: fix situation where fbcon gets deinitialised and can't reinit.

2010-12-27 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:41:17AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > Situation as follow: > 2 GPUs + vesafb + kms. > > GPU 1 is primary, vesafb binds to it as fb0 > radeon loads > GPU 0 loads as fb1 > GPU 1 loads, vesafb gets kicked off which causes fb0 to unbind > console, which

[PATCH 3/3] fbcon: fix situation where fbcon gets deinitialised and can't reinit.

2010-12-24 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:41:17AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie > > Situation as follow: > 2 GPUs + vesafb + kms. > > GPU 1 is primary, vesafb binds to it as fb0 > radeon loads > GPU 0 loads as fb1 > GPU 1 loads, vesafb gets kicked off which causes fb0 to unbind > console, which

[PATCH 1/3] fb: fix overlapping test off-by-one.

2010-12-24 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:29:03AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > On Die, 2010-12-21 at 11:41 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > From: Dave Airlie > > > > On my system with a radeon x2, the first GPU was not overlapping vesa > > but the test decided it was. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > > ---

[Ksummit-2010-discuss] [v2] Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-10-19 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 08:39:58AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 09:26 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 October 2010 06:52:32 Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > I might be able to find some hardware still lying around here that uses > > > > an > > > > i810. Not sure unl

Re: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] [v2] Remaining BKL users, what to do

2010-10-19 Thread Paul Mundt
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 08:39:58AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 09:26 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 October 2010 06:52:32 Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > I might be able to find some hardware still lying around here that uses > > > > an > > > > i810. Not sure unl