On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 1:43 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Thanks you so much for testing. I'll prepare a real patch. Can I add
> your Reported-by and Tested-by tags?
Reported-by: Nuno Gonçalves
Tested-by: Nuno Gonçalves
Thanks,
Nuno
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 12:18 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Thanks for testing. Attached is another patch. It attempts to restore
> the fbdev handling as before the regression. Please give it a try.
This one fixes it for me. Thanks
> Here's a first attempt to address this bug. Could you please apply the
> attached patch and report on the results? It should work against the
> upcoming v6.13-rc1 or against a recent drm-misc-next.
Hi. No luck yet.
I collected crashes before the patch:
BUG: Bad page map in process husband pte
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 14:37 Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Am 11.11.24 um 14:42 schrieb Nuno Gonçalves:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 1:22 PM Thomas Zimmermann
> wrote:
> >> The patch in question changes the whole memory management of the
> >> affected
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 1:22 PM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> The patch in question changes the whole memory management of the
> affected code. It's also noteworthy that most of it has been reworked
> for the upcoming v6.12. Maybe this already fixed the problem. Kernel
> v6.11-rc7 added commit 5a498d
Hi Thomas,
Since 5ab91447aa13b8b98bc11f5326f33500b0ee2c48 and still happening in
master, I often get a kernel crash, either a "Unable to handle kernel
NULL pointer dereference at virtual address" or "Unable to handle
kernel paging request at virtual address".
This happens in ARM64 with ili9225 an
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:27 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Could you please try the attached patch? It's similar to your solution,
> but closer to the original intention of the code.
Works fine.
Tested-by: Nuno Gonçalves
Thanks,
Nuno
I am crashing the kernel by doing something I believe I am allowed to do.
Using mmap to write to /dev/fb0 as the compatibility layer for Tiny
DRM vot,v220hf01a-t (ili9225).
First it happens that because of the display resolution of 220*176 the
buffer is (16 bit) 77440 bytes, which is not a multip
