Re: [PATCH v3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Associate PWM device to auxiliary device

2023-12-09 Thread Nikita Travkin
s expected as parent devices are handled just fine. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König This works well now, thanks! Tested-by: Nikita Travkin # Acer Aspire 1 Nikita > --- > Changes since v2 > (https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20231209152520.1987483-2-u.kleine-koe...@pengutroni

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Associate PWM device to auxiliary device

2023-12-08 Thread Nikita Travkin
Uwe Kleine-König писал(а) 27.11.2023 15:15: > It's the ti_sn65dsi86.pwm auxiliary driver that creates the pwmchip, so > let the auxiliary device be the parent of the pwm device. > > Note that getting a reference to the ti-sn65dsi86's pwm using pwm_get() > isn't affected by this change as ti_sn65ds

[PATCH] drm/panel: samsung-s6d7aa0: Add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE

2023-08-02 Thread Nikita Travkin
oller driver") Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin --- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d7aa0.c index 0583360b1280..ea5a85779382 100644 --- a/drive

[PATCH] drm/panel-edp: Add enable timings for N140HCA-EAC panel

2023-08-01 Thread Nikita Travkin
Add timings for InnoLux N140HCA-EAC. This panel is found on some laptops such as Acer Aspire 1. Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin --- Timings taken per datasheet: http://www.58display.com/ggs/20180713155310173_N140HCA-EAC_Rev.C1_Ver3.0_20170121_201710238414.pdf --- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c

Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement wait_hpd_asserted

2023-04-13 Thread Nikita Travkin
Doug Anderson писал(а) 13.04.2023 01:22: > Hi, > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:20 AM Nikita Travkin wrote: >> >> This bridge doesn't actually implement HPD due to it being way too slow >> but instead expects the panel driver to wait enough to assume HPD is >>

[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement wait_hpd_asserted

2023-04-08 Thread Nikita Travkin
tead. In order to support such panels, add a dummy implementation of wait that would just sleep the maximum delay and assume no failure has happened. Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin --- This was suggested in [1] to make sure DT users can be semantically correct (not adding no-hpd when the line is