The expression (~0 >> x) will always yield all-ones, because the right
shift is an arithmetic right shift that will always shift ones in.
Accordingly ~(~0 >> x) will always be zero.
Hence 'mask' will always be zero in this case.
Fix this by forcing a logical right shift instead of an arithmetic
ri
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:47:17 -0400
Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
> > The expression (~0 >> x) will always yield all-ones, because the right
> > shift is an arithmetic right shift that will always shift ones in.
> > Accordingly ~(~0 >> x) will always
The expression (~0 >> x) will always yield all-ones, because the right
shift is an arithmetic right shift that will always shift ones in.
Accordingly ~(~0 >> x) will always be zero.
Hence 'mask' will always be zero in this case.
Fix this by forcing a logical right shift instead of an arithmetic
ri
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:33:39 +0200
Jean Delvare wrote:
> retry mechanism: Chris Wilson and Michael Buesch (both Cc'd.) Chris,
> Michael, do you know of ways to reproduce the issue?
The error could easily reproduced by loading the machine heavily.
So my guess is that it is caused by electrical no
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:33:39 +0200
Jean Delvare wrote:
> retry mechanism: Chris Wilson and Michael Buesch (both Cc'd.) Chris,
> Michael, do you know of ways to reproduce the issue?
The error could easily reproduced by loading the machine heavily.
So my guess is that it is caused by electrical no
