RCU read locks shared with nmi handlers.
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
- On Apr 9, 2019, at 11:40 AM, Joel Fernandes, Google
j...@joelfernandes.org wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 01:24:47PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 8, 2019, at 11:46 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 1
- On Apr 9, 2019, at 12:40 PM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:56:03AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 9, 2019, at 11:40 AM, Joel Fernandes, Google
>> j...@joelfernandes.org
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 0
unload
that module.
Given that we end up doing the allocation/cleanup under the hood, the
API users don't interact with init_srcu_struct() nor cleanup_srcu_struct(),
so it's not obvious that this comment also applies to them.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS
- On Apr 8, 2019, at 10:22 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:05:34AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 7, 2019, at 10:27 PM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 09:07:18PM +, Joel F
- On Apr 8, 2019, at 11:46 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:49:32AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 8, 2019, at 10:22 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:05:34AM -0400,
- On Apr 7, 2019, at 10:27 PM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 09:07:18PM +, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 04:41:36PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> >
>> > - On Apr 7, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Joe
isn't one advantage of leaving that stuff in the RO_DATA_SECTION()
>> macro that it can be mapped read-only? Or am I suffering from excessive
>> optimism?
>
> And to answer the other question, in the case where I am suffering from
> excessive optimism, i
- On Apr 7, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Joel Fernandes, Google j...@joelfernandes.org
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 03:26:16PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:59 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at
- On Apr 3, 2019, at 9:32 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:34:07AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 2, 2019, at 11:23 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:14:40AM -0400,
| 40 +++-
> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 48
> +
> 7 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
- On Apr 2, 2019, at 11:23 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:14:40AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:28 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > This
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com) wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> * Keith Packard (keithp at keithp.com) wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:56:21 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers > efficios.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Dell U3011 monitor turns to power sav
Hi Keith,
* Keith Packard (keithp at keithp.com) wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:56:21 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers efficios.com> wrote:
>
> > Dell U3011 monitor turns to power saving mode when resolution set to 2560 x
> > 1600
> > (intermittent)
> >
> > Re
Dell U3011 monitor turns to power saving mode when resolution set to 2560 x 1600
(intermittent)
Reproduced with:
Linux 2.6.38-1-amd64 (Debian kernel)
Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (Debian kernel)
Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (Debian kernel)
The computer is a Lenovo X201 Tablet (Intel QM57 chipset), on a X200
dock
15 matches
Mail list logo
