g like
> RADEON_MIN_UVD_POWER_LEVEL=(uvd_sd|uvd_hd|uvd_hd2|uvd|uvd_mvc) which
> forces a minimum level, but still let the kernel decide if we don't
> wouldn't want a higher level.
>
> Christian.
>
> Am 15.08.2014 um 19:10 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>
> On Fr
0 dclk: 3
> [4.106850] power level 0sclk: 38000 vddc_index: 2
> [4.106853] power level 1sclk: 38000 vddc_index: 2
>
> As you can see we currently always select the performance level uvd, which
> results in selecting the maximum sclk/dclk and vc
7-wip, dynamic UVD state selection (according to active
> streams) is still completely disabled. It will always use the generic
> UVD state. In fact wasn't it reverted again because of the performance
> issues on some systems?
>
> Grigori
>
> > Alex
> >
> &
DPAU. In this case VDPAU don't
> has the slightest idea how high SCLK/MCLK must be and so can't give that
> info to the kernel either.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> Am 15.08.2014 um 15:21 schrieb Marco Benatto:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I also had a talk with Alex yesterda
Hey all,
I also had a talk with Alex yesterday about post-processing issues when
using dynamic UVD profiles and a chamge on CS ioctl
including a flag to let user mode driver tell to the kernel which
performance requirement it wants for post processing. A commom
point for both discussion is to stab
Hi all,
I'm Marco Benatto, I've been helping on [PATCH] drm/radeon: Adding UVD
handle basis fps estimation v2 once it has already been sent I'd like to
know if there's any pending task that someone would like help?
Please let me know whether there is some.
Thanks,
--
M
