Re: [PATCHv3 06/11] mm/vmscan: Use PG_dropbehind instead of PG_reclaim

2025-02-03 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 04:01:43PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 6:02 PM Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > > > The recently introduced PG_dropbehind allows for freeing folios > > immediately after writeback. Unlike PG_reclaim, it does not need vmscan &

Re: [PATCHv2 11/11] mm: Rename PG_dropbehind to PG_reclaim

2025-01-17 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:18:16PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:31:35AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Now as PG_reclaim is gone, its name can be reclaimed for better > > use :) > > > > Rename PG_dropbehind to PG_reclaim and r

Re: [PATCHv2 05/11] mm/truncate: Use folio_set_dropbehind() instead of deactivate_file_folio()k

2025-01-17 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:46:44PM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:35 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:31:29AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > -static void lru_deactivate_file(struct lruvec *lruvec, st

Re: [PATCH 8/8] mm: Remove PG_reclaim

2025-01-14 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 03:28:43PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:34:53AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > > index caadbe393aa2..beba72da5e33 100644 > > --- a/mm/migrate.c > > +++ b/mm/migrate.c &

Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/swap: Use PG_dropbehind instead of PG_reclaim

2025-01-14 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 08:17:20AM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 1:35 AM Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > > > The recently introduced PG_dropbehind allows for freeing folios > > immediately after writeback. Unlike PG_reclaim, it does not need vmscan &

Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm: Remove PG_reclaim

2025-01-13 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:45:48PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:34:45AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Use PG_dropbehind instead of PG_reclaim and remove PG_reclaim. > > I was hoping we'd end up with the name PG_reclaim instead of the

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

2021-09-24 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:05:58AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Unless we find other way to guarantee RIP-relative access, we must use > > fixup_pointer() to access any global variables. > > Yah, I&#x

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

2021-09-22 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 09:52:07PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:30:15PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Not fine, but waiting to blowup with random build environment change. > > Why is it not fine? > > Are you suspecting that the co

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

2021-09-22 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 08:40:43AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 9/21/21 4:58 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 04:43:59PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > > On 9/21/21 4:34 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

2021-09-21 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 04:43:59PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 9/21/21 4:34 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:20:59AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

2021-09-21 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:20:59AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > I still believe calling cc_platform_has() from __startup_64() is totally > > broken as it lacks proper wrapping while accessing global varia

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

2021-09-21 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
mm/mem_encrypt_identity.c @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ void __init sme_encrypt_kernel(struct boot_params *bp) unsigned long pgtable_area_len; unsigned long decrypted_base; - if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) + if (1 || !cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) return; /* -- Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()

2021-09-20 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
ave a special version of the helper). Note that only AMD requires these cc_platform_has() to return true. -- Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-12 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:52:55AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 8/11/21 7:19 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 02:48:54PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > >> On 8/10/21 1:45 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: > >>> > >>> &g

Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()

2021-08-11 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
thing with this shared/unencrypted > area, though? Or since it is shared, there's actually nothing you need to > do (the bss decrpyted section exists even if CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is not > configured)? AFAICS, only kvmclock uses __bss_decrypted. We don't enable kvmclock in TDX at the moment. It may change in the future. -- Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [git pull] drm fixes for 5.14-rc2

2021-07-17 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
es across the > board. > > Dave. > > drm-fixes-2021-07-16: > drm fixes for 5.14-rc2 Dave, Daniel, Looks like the fix[1] for nouveau regression[2] is missing. Hm? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/nouveau/20210609172902.1937-1-christian.koe...@amd.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YOC4uekpD7iA3xPi@Red/T/#u -- Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: nouveau: failed to initialise sync

2021-07-14 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
  Nouveau now doesn't init the GEM object for internally allocated BOs, >     so make sure that we at least initialize some necessary fields. > > Could be that the patch needs to be send to stable as well. The regression is present in v5.14-rc1. Any idea when it will hit upstream? I don't see it being applied to drm=next. -- Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [git pull] drm next pull for 5.10-rc1

2020-11-09 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 04:58:14PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > ACK, I will send out a patch for this asap Any update. AFAICS, v5.10-rc3 is still buggy. -- Kirill A. Shutemov ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org ht

Re: [git pull] drm next pull for 5.10-rc1

2020-11-03 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
re NULL. It worked. In my setup I stepped onto nv50_msto_help->atomic_enable == NULL. But there are two more drm_encoder_helper_funcs in dispnv50/disp.c that don't have atomic_enable/disable set: nv50_dac_help, nv50_pior_help. -- Kirill A. Shutemov ___

Re: [PATCH v3] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers

2020-07-30 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
tise support > for them. Doing so would imply compatibility > between devices with incompatible memory layouts. > > Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, > weston@c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc, > gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04, > kmscube hacke

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers

2020-07-29 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
gt; >> modifier. To accomplish this, some layout > > > >> parameters must be assumed to match properties of > > > >> the device targeted by the relevant ioctls. To > > > >> avoid perpetuating misuse of the old-style > > > >> modifie

Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers

2020-07-17 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
f4c0cf150 RSI: c0406481 RDI: 0009 RBP: c0406481 R08: 55db823225e8 R09: 55db8231b5e8 R10: 7fbe79ce0920 R11: 0246 R12: 55db823115e0 R13: 0009 R14: 55db8230ffc0 R15: 55db8230f380 -- Kirill A. Shutemov ___

Re: [git pull] drm for 5.8-rc1

2020-07-01 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:57:19AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:40:19PM -0700, James Jones wrote: > > This implies something is trying to use one of the old > > DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK format modifiers with DRM-KMS without > > first c

Re: [git pull] drm for 5.8-rc1

2020-07-01 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
X > driver if it isn't modesetting, or glamour? Modesetting without anything tricky. -- Kirill A. Shutemov ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH v11 01/25] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four routines

2019-12-18 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:15:53PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > On 12/18/19 7:52 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 02:25:13PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > > > +static void put_compound_head(struct page *page, int refs) > > > +{ > > > + /*

Re: [PATCH v11 06/25] mm: fix get_user_pages_remote()'s handling of FOLL_LONGTERM

2019-12-18 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
vmas arg is NULL) > + * and return -ENOTSUPP if DAX isn't allowed in this case: > + */ > + return __gup_longterm_locked(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, pages, > + vm

Re: [PATCH v11 04/25] mm: devmap: refactor 1-based refcounting for ZONE_DEVICE pages

2019-12-18 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
e condition would save you an indentation level. > + int count = page_ref_dec_return(page); > + > + /* > + * devmap page refcounts are 1-based, rather than 0-based: if > + * refcount is 1, then the page is free and the refcount is >

Re: [PATCH v11 01/25] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four routines

2019-12-18 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
page); > +} It's not terribly efficient. Maybe something like: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) < ref, page); if (refs > 2) page_ref_sub(page, refs - 1); put_page(page); ? -- Kirill A. Shutemov _

Re: Ack to merge through DRM? WAS Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Add write-protect and clean utilities for address space ranges

2019-10-02 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
users included here: > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux/log/?h=coherent-rebased > > Do you think this could work? The reason that the "mm: Add write-protect and > clean.." code is still in mm as a set of helpers, is of course that much of > the needed functi

Re: Ack to merge through DRM? WAS Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Add write-protect and clean utilities for address space ranges

2019-09-30 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:39:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 5:17 AM Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > > > > Call it "walk_page_mapping()". And talk extensively about how the > > > locking differs a lot from the usual "walk

Re: Ack to merge through DRM? WAS Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Add write-protect and clean utilities for address space ranges

2019-09-27 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
from PMD layer and it's bogus. i_mmap_lock() works fine for file mappings. The PMD was intended for THP case at the time when there were only anon-THP. The check was relaxed and later dropped for file-THP on PMD level. It has to be dropped on PUD too. We don't have anon-THP on PUD

Re: Ack to merge through DRM? WAS Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Add write-protect and clean utilities for address space ranges

2019-09-27 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
r walking in pagewalk.c would seem to be > the simplest model. > > Call it "walk_page_mapping()". And talk extensively about how the > locking differs a lot from the usual "walk_page_vma()" things. Walking mappings of a page is what rmap does. This code thas to be

Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: Add write-protect and clean utilities for address space ranges

2019-09-18 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
ted > F: drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/ > F: include/uapi/drm/vmwgfx_drm.h > +F: mm/as_dirty_helpers.c Emm.. No. Core MM functinality cannot belong to random driver. -- Kirill A. Shutemov

[PATCH] vgaarb: fix signal handling in vga_get()

2015-12-14 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:20:00AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:28:58AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 30, 20

[PATCH] vgaarb: fix signal handling in vga_get()

2015-12-14 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:28:58AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > There are few defects in vga_get() related to signal hadning: > > > > - we shouldn't check for pending signals fo

[PATCH] vgaarb: fix signal handling in vga_get()

2015-12-10 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:17:31AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > There are few defects in vga_get() related to signal hadning: > > - we shouldn't check for pending signals for TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE > case; > > - if we found pending signal we must remove

[PATCH] vgaarb: fix signal handling in vga_get()

2015-11-30 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
te, I guess. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- Alex, I try to get KVM with VGA passthrough working properly. I have i915 (HD 4600) on the host and GTX 580 for the guest. The guest GPU is not capabale of EFI, so I have to use x-vga=on. It's kinda work with your patch for i915.enable_hd_vga

[PATCH V6 3/6] mm: Introduce VM_LOCKONFAULT

2015-08-06 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
LL_MLOCK flag to communicate the locked state of a VMA. > >FOLL_POPULATE will now only control if the VMA should be populated and > >in the case of VM_LOCKONFAULT, it will not be set. > > > >Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson > >Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > >Cc:

[PATCH V5 3/7] mm: Introduce VM_LOCKONFAULT

2015-07-27 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
the case of VM_LOCKONFAULT, it will not be set. > > Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson > Cc: Michal Hocko > Cc: Vlastimil Babka > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" > Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: l

[RFCv3 0/5] enable migration of driver pages

2015-07-09 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
work well) we'd need to pimp shmem to a) > > hand large pages to us b) forward the migrate calls. Probably that means > > we need to build our own gemfs reusing shmemfs code. > > AFAIK there are efforts ongoing to make large pages work with shmem. > > Kirill, IIRC you mentioned that you're were looking into this a while > back? I work in this direction, but don't have anything to show at the moment. Hugh has published his implementation of huge tmpfs back in February: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/alpine.LSU.2.11.1502201941340.14414 at eggly.anvils -- Kirill A. Shutemov

[Bug 87891] New: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2625!

2014-11-12 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:17:16AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter &g

[Bug 87891] New: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2625!

2014-11-12 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:56:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 03:47:03 +0200 "Kirill A. Shutemov" shutemov.name> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -080

[Bug 87891] New: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2625!

2014-11-12 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:41AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:49:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:36:28 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter > linux.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andrew Morton wr

[Bug 87891] New: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2625!

2014-11-12 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
GFP_HIGHMEM is bit 1. > > Ah, yes, OK. > > I suppose it's possible that __GFP_HIGHMEM was set. > > do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page > ->pte_alloc_one > ->alloc_pages(__userpte_alloc_gfp==__GFP_HIGHMEM) do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page alloc_hugepage_vma alloc_pages_vma(GFP_TRANSHUGE) GFP_TRANSHUGE contains GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, which has __GFP_HIGHMEM. -- Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [PATCH v2] gma500: medfield: drop bogus NULL check in mdfld_dsi_output_init()

2012-10-08 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
+ if ((pipe != 0) && (pipe != 2)) { It would be nice to remove redundant parentheses while you're there. Otherwise Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > DRM_ERROR("Invalid parameter\n"); > return; > } > > > -- >

[PATCH v2] gma500: medfield: drop bogus NULL check in mdfld_dsi_output_init()

2012-10-08 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
+ if ((pipe != 0) && (pipe != 2)) { It would be nice to remove redundant parentheses while you're there. Otherwise Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > DRM_ERROR("Invalid parameter\n"); > return; > } > > > -- > To

[patch] gma500: silence an unused variable warning

2012-05-10 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
to use the new config_enabled() macro. :) The first [direct] user of config_enabled()! :) Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c > index 05661bf..d2125ba 100644 > ---

Re: [patch] gma500: silence an unused variable warning

2012-05-10 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
to use the new config_enabled() macro. :) The first [direct] user of config_enabled()! :) Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c > index 05661bf..d2125ba 100644 > ---

[PATCH] gma500: Don't needlessly include version.h in mdfld_dsi_output.h

2012-04-12 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:05:29AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_dsi_output.h does not need to > '#include ' - so don't. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- next part -

Re: [PATCH] gma500: Don't needlessly include version.h in mdfld_dsi_output.h

2012-04-11 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:05:29AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_dsi_output.h does not need to > '#include ' - so don't. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov -- Kirill A. Shutemov signature.asc Des

[PATCH] gma500: medfield: fix build without CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE

2012-03-24 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" drivers/built-in.o: In function `mdfld_dsi_connector_set_property': mdfld_dsi_output.c:(.text+0x6e909): undefined reference to `mdfld_set_brightness' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- drivers/gpu/drm/gma50

[PATCH] gma500: medfield: fix build without CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE

2012-03-24 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" drivers/built-in.o: In function `mdfld_dsi_connector_set_property': mdfld_dsi_output.c:(.text+0x6e909): undefined reference to `mdfld_set_brightness' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- drivers/gpu/drm/gma50

Re: i915: eDP regression

2011-12-06 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:37:15AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 19:35 +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Commit dc22ee6 introduces regression on my laptop HP EliteBook 8440p. I see > > nothing on the panel after mode setting. Rev

i915: eDP regression

2011-12-05 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:37:15AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 19:35 +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Commit dc22ee6 introduces regression on my laptop HP EliteBook 8440p. I see > > nothing on the panel after mode setting. Rev

i915: eDP regression

2011-12-04 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
00 00 00 00 00 00 01 02 00 e0: 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ab 0f 18 00 18 d0 6f bb -- Kirill A. Shutemov ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mail

i915: eDP regression

2011-12-03 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
00 00 00 00 00 00 01 02 00 e0: 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ab 0f 18 00 18 d0 6f bb -- Kirill A. Shutemov