On 11/07/2023 10:58, Jani Nikula wrote:
I didn't notice anything on dri-devel mailing list about this.
I presume you're using CONFIG_WERROR=y or W=e.
I'm just using whatever vanilla x86_64_defconfig gives.
See [1] and [2]. I'm undecided how we should treat this.
Ok.
Thanks,
John
Hi guys,
Did anyone else notice this build issue on v6.5-rc1:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c:143:15: error: expected expression
before ‘,’ token
GEN3_FEATURES,
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c:151:15: error: expected expression
before ‘,’ token
GEN3_FEATURES,
Hi Thomas,
drm-tip now contains
I have tested today's linux-next, which includes this:
commit a88248506a2bcfeaef6837a53cde19fe11970e6c
Author: Thomas Zimmermann
Date: Tue Dec 3 09:38:15 2019 +0100
drm/hisilicon/hibmc: Switch to generic fbdev emulation
which removes this entire c
On 19/12/2019 09:54, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 7:08 PM John Garry wrote:
+
So the v5.4 kernel does not have this issue.
I have bisected the initial occurrence to:
commit 37a48adfba6cf6e87df9ba8b75ab85d514ed86d8
Author: Thomas Zimmermann
Date: Fri Sep 6 14:20:53 2019
ent a reference counter.
So this either exposes or creates the issue.
John
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 17:23 +0000, John Garry wrote:
Hi all,
Enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE causes many warns on a system
with the HIBMC hw:
[ 27.788806] WARNING: CPU: 24 PID: 1 at
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_hel
Hi Ezequiel,
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 17:23 +, John Garry wrote:
Hi all,
Enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE causes many warns on a system
with the HIBMC hw:
[ 27.788806] WARNING: CPU: 24 PID: 1 at
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c:564 bo_driver_move_notify+0x8c/0x98
A total
On 16/12/2019 17:23, John Garry wrote:
+, -
Hi all,
xinliang is bouncing. We need to get his
new mail address.
John
Enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE causes many warns on a system
with the HIBMC hw:
[ 27.788806] WARNING: CPU: 24 PID: 1 at
drivers/gpu/drm
Hi all,
Enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE causes many warns on a system
with the HIBMC hw:
[ 27.788806] WARNING: CPU: 24 PID: 1 at
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c:564 bo_driver_move_notify+0x8c/0x98
[ 27.798969] Modules linked in:
[ 27.802018] CPU: 24 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/
On 26/09/2018 10:41, Xinliang Liu wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 16:46, John Garry wrote:
On 26/09/2018 04:00, Xinliang Liu wrote:
Thanks John, good addressing!
The root cause as you said, our hibmc previous frame buffer format
depth setting is wrong which does not pass the new format sanity
hisilicon-drm-next.
I can't see this branch in the git associated with this driver from its
MAINTAINERS entry (git://github.com/xin3liang/linux.git), but please
ensure these fixes are included in 4.19
Thanks,
John
Thanks,
Xinliang
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 20:32, John Garry wrote:
e.
Fix by not overwriting the surface depth.
Fixes: d1667b86795a ("drm/hisilicon/hibmc: Add support for frame buffer")
Signed-off-by: John Garry
---
drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_fbdev.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/
oding it.
Tested on Huawei D05 board. I can see tux on BMC VGA console.
John Garry (3):
drm/hisilicon: hibmc: Do not carry error code in HiBMC framebuffer
pointer
drm/hisilicon: hibmc: Don't overwrite fb helper surface depth
drm/hisilicon: hibmc: Use HUAWEI PCI vendor ID macro
d
[9.913418] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[9.917024] Code: a94153f3 a8c27bfd d65f03c0 d503201f (f9400c01)
[9.923180] ---[ end trace 2695ffa0af5be375 ]---
Fixes: d1667b86795a ("drm/hisilicon/hibmc: Add support for frame buffer")
Signed-off-by: John Garry
---
drivers/gpu/drm/hisil
Switch to use Huawei PCI vendor ID macro from pci_ids.h file.
In addition, switch to use PCI_VDEVICE() instead of open coding.
Signed-off-by: John Garry
---
drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm
On 21/09/2018 15:28, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting John Garry (2018-09-21 09:11:19)
On 21/09/2018 06:49, Liuxinliang (Matthew Liu) wrote:
Hi John,
Thank you for reporting bug.
I am now using 4.18.7. I haven't found this issue yet.
I will try linux-next and figure out what's wro
ct unknown legacy bpp and depth for drm_mode_addfb ioctl
Thanks,
John
On 2018/9/20 19:23, John Garry wrote:
On 20/09/2018 11:04, John Garry wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing this crash below on linux-next (20 Sept).
This is on an arm64 D05 board, which includes the HiBMC device. D06 was
also crashing for w
On 20/09/2018 11:04, John Garry wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing this crash below on linux-next (20 Sept).
This is on an arm64 D05 board, which includes the HiBMC device. D06 was
also crashing for what looked like same reason. I am using standard
defconfig, except DRM and DRM_HISI_HIBMC are built-in
8/0x28
[9.902337] process_one_work+0x1e0/0x318
[9.906382] worker_thread+0x228/0x450
[9.910164] kthread+0x128/0x130
[9.913418] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[9.917024] Code: a94153f3 a8c27bfd d65f03c0 d503201f (f9400c01)
[9.923180] ---[ end trace 2695ffa0af5be375 ]---
On Thu, 20 Sep
18 matches
Mail list logo