Re: [PATCH 7/9] drm/edid: Expose mandatory stereo modes for HDMI sinks

2013-09-13 Thread Joakim Plate
Damien Lespiau intel.com> writes: > +static const struct s3d_mandatory_mode s3d_mandatory_modes[] = { > + { 1920, 1080, 24, 0, > + DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_TOP_AND_BOTTOM | DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_FRAME_PACKING }, > + { 1920, 1080, 50, DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE, > + DRM_MODE_FLAG_3D_SIDE_BY_S

Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm: Add a DRM_CAP_STEREO_3D capability for SET_CAP ioctl

2013-09-13 Thread Joakim Plate
David Herrmann gmail.com> writes: > > So just to be clear: Whenever a mode is present with 3D flags, it is > also a valid non-3D mode? Is this guaranteed? > Well.. Some HDTV's will when they receive a frame packed mode (1080*2+45=2205 pixels high) . Display just the top part. The bottom part

[i915] Backlight brighter since 3.9.0

2013-05-22 Thread Joakim Plate
Hi, > > 2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter ffwll.ch> > Yeah, this is a feature. HDMI has (for oddball backwards compat with > analog TV signals) a special mode which reduces the useable RGB value > range by chopping off about 10% at the bottom and top end. This results in > light colors getting brighter an

Re: [i915] Backlight brighter since 3.9.0

2013-05-22 Thread Joakim Plate
Hi, > > 2013/5/20 Daniel Vetter ffwll.ch> > Yeah, this is a feature. HDMI has (for oddball backwards compat with > analog TV signals) a special mode which reduces the useable RGB value > range by chopping off about 10% at the bottom and top end. This results in > light colors getting brighter an

[PATCH 0/4] drm/edid: Recognize 60Hz and 59.94Hz CEA modes

2013-05-10 Thread Joakim Plate
Ville Syrj?l? linux.intel.com> writes: > I think I'll defer on that one until we decide whether we want add > both 60Hz and 59.94HZ versions to the connector's mode list. Daniel > suggested we do it, but I disagree slightly since CEA-861 says that > monitors should only advertise one variant in t

Re: [PATCH 0/4] drm/edid: Recognize 60Hz and 59.94Hz CEA modes

2013-05-10 Thread Joakim Plate
Ville Syrjälä linux.intel.com> writes: > I think I'll defer on that one until we decide whether we want add > both 60Hz and 59.94HZ versions to the connector's mode list. Daniel > suggested we do it, but I disagree slightly since CEA-861 says that > monitors should only advertise one variant in t

RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC

2012-06-14 Thread Joakim Plate
> > > > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000. Only > > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME clock. > > > > App that rely on it being anything special are badly broken and i > don't think there is any such app. The specifi

Re: RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC

2012-06-14 Thread Joakim Plate
> > > > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000. Only > > issue is that changing it will break any app relying on it being REALTIME clock. > > > > App that rely on it being anything special are badly broken and i > don't think there is any such app. The specifi

RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC

2012-06-13 Thread Joakim Plate
Michel D?nzer daenzer.net> writes: > > > > > > From the GLX_OML_sync_control spec: > > > > > > The Unadjusted System Time (or UST) is a 64-bit monotonically > > > increasing counter [...] > > >

Re: RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC

2012-06-13 Thread Joakim Plate
Michel Dänzer daenzer.net> writes: > > > > > > From the GLX_OML_sync_control spec: > > > > > > The Unadjusted System Time (or UST) is a 64-bit monotonically > > > increasing counter [...] > > > From what I can tell, it should be using: ktime_to_ns(ktime_get()) / 1000. Only is

RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC

2012-06-10 Thread Joakim Plate
Hi, I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule presentation of video frames in xbmc. I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't specify what time the UST clock really is, nor can i find any mention of it elsewhere in docs. Code wise it seem to be

RFC: Change OML_sync_control UST to CLOCK_MONOTONIC

2012-06-10 Thread Joakim Plate
Hi, I'm currently trying to make use of OML_sync_control extension to schedule presentation of video frames in xbmc. I've run into somewhat of a snag. It seem the spec doesn't specify what time the UST clock really is, nor can i find any mention of it elsewhere in docs. Code wise it seem to be

[PATCH] drm_edid: support CEA video modes

2012-05-18 Thread Joakim Plate
Joakim Plate ecce.se> writes: > > Christian Schmidt digadd.de> writes: > > > > > TFT/plasma televisions and projectors have become commonplace, and so > > has the use of PCs to drive them. Add the video modes specified by an > > EDID's CEA ex

Re: [PATCH] drm_edid: support CEA video modes

2012-05-18 Thread Joakim Plate
Joakim Plate ecce.se> writes: > > Christian Schmidt digadd.de> writes: > > > > > TFT/plasma televisions and projectors have become commonplace, and so > > has the use of PCs to drive them. Add the video modes specified by an > > EDID's CEA ex

[PATCH] drm_edid: support CEA video modes

2012-02-06 Thread Joakim Plate
Christian Schmidt digadd.de> writes: > > TFT/plasma televisions and projectors have become commonplace, and so > has the use of PCs to drive them. Add the video modes specified by an > EDID's CEA extension to the mode database for a connector. Hi, Looking over this i noticed that this patch ad

Re: [PATCH] drm_edid: support CEA video modes

2012-02-06 Thread Joakim Plate
Christian Schmidt digadd.de> writes: > > TFT/plasma televisions and projectors have become commonplace, and so > has the use of PCs to drive them. Add the video modes specified by an > EDID's CEA extension to the mode database for a connector. Hi, Looking over this i noticed that this patch ad