Hello,
This patch seems to have been archived but I can't seem to find it in
the drm-misc git, is there anything else I should be doing to get this
patch approved and included?
Best regards,
Jesse
Use the atomic version of enable/disable.
To support bridges where bus format negotiation is needed such as TIDSS we
need to implement atomic_get_input_bus_fmts, prepare the driver for this by
switching the existing operations to it's atomic variants.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Van Gavere
---
Ch
Hello Dmitry,
> The patch LGTM, but the commit message needs some work. Why/how does
> TIDSS require bridges to use atomic ops?
In hindsight that indeed could've been worded better, the approach
here was as a stepping stone to implementing the input bus formats,
which is what TIDSS needs, so I'll
Use the atomic version of enable/disable.
Doing so enables it to work in a chain where atomic operations are expected
such as TIDSS
Signed-off-by: Jesse Van Gavere
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hello Dmitry,
> How is it so? I don't see any specific requirements on the TIDSS side.
Seems right, must've been a mistake on my end
> I think that's a separate topic. Bridge drivers don't have to implement
> atomic_check. In fact, if you check the latest LT9611 driver, it has dropped
> the .a
Hello Dmitry,
...
> The atomic_check() function verifies if the passed set of changes (in the
> form of drm_*_state) is valid from the driver's point of view. If you have
> nothing to check, it's fine to skip the function.
...
Perhaps one last question on the use of atomic_check, this functio
Hello Dmitry,
> The atomic_check() function verifies if the passed set of changes (in the
> form of drm_*_state) is valid from the driver's point of view. If you have
> nothing to check, it's fine to skip the function.
I'll look over the other examples a bit then but I think the reason for
imp
Hey all,
For one of our new boards I have to get the ADV7513 chip working with TIDSS,
the driver for this expects a bridge chip to have atomic ops and provide bus
formats.
Doing this for our own needs was quite straightforward but I'd very much like
to upstream this as I think it could be helpf
Hey all,
(Hope this is not a duplicate as my first mail didn't seem to have gone through)
For one of our new boards I have to get the ADV7513 chip working with TIDSS,
the driver for this expects a bridge chip to have atomic ops and provide bus
formats.
Doing this for our own needs was quite stra
