om
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
meson.build | 24 ++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 166559e8..7f786a8c 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ pkg = import('pkgconfig')
with_ude
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 12:15 +, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Sunday, 2018-02-18 14:00:50 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > -Dcairo-tests=false currently results into enabling cairo support if it
> > was found. Same for valgrind.
>
-Dcairo-tests=false currently results into enabling cairo support if it
was found. Same for valgrind.
v2:
* Use underscore-prefixed variables to not change type of variable
* Use empty array for "fake" dependency instead of real empty object
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
meson.
-Dcairo-tests=false currently results into enabling cairo support if it
was found. Same for valgrind.
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
meson.build | 20
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 166559e8..695f89b3 100644
.
Builds fine on all architectures supported by Fedora, boots fine on my laptop
(x86_64).
All nitpicks are inline.
> Signed-off-by: Dylan Baker
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
> diff --git a/meson_options.txt b/meson_options.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..08
ombo', value : 'false', choices : ['true',
> 'false', 'auto'])
> +option('vc4', type : 'combo', value : 'auto', choices : ['true',
> 'false', 'auto'])
> +option('etnaviv&#
51231
Thinkpad X230:
Reported-and-tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
ThinkPad X1 Carbon:
Reported-and-tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
Lenovo Yoga 13:
Reported-by: Lennart Poettering
Reported-and-tested-by: Kevin Smith
Reference: https://bugzilla.kerne
Hi,
add some updates to the patch ;)
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 13:29 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 04:56 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Any news here? If no - I think we need re-send patch as new..
>
> Since the v2 patch can't apply cleanly on top of pm's -next tre
Hi,
please add some updates ;)
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 13:29 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 04:56 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Any news here? If no - I think we need re-send patch as new..
>
> Since the v2 patch can't apply cleanly on top of pm's -next tree, I
>
ported-and-tested-by: Peter Weber
> Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
> Thinkpad X230:
> Reported-and-tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
> Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
> Lenovo Yoga 13:
> Reported-by: Lennart Poettering
> Reported-and-tes
> > I've added this series to my queue for 3.13.
> >
> > Since the next step will be to introduce a list of systems that need
> > video.use_native_backlight=1 *and* don't break in that configuration, I
> > don't
> > see much point adding
; > Of course, distro kernels may always change the default to true if they
> > > want.
> >
> > They can, but they'd need to either patch the kernel to do so, or code
> > it in userspace bootloader configs. Having a config option they can
> > set to chan
issue impact
> far more people? Shouldn't it be defaulted to true?
>
> If nothing else, can you add a config option for the default so
> distros can use that to decide which way to default it and then work
> on fixing the remaining users that have troubles?
>
> josh
I
4 +
> 7 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
>
Excellent! I've tested this patch-set on ThinkPad X230 and backlight
issue is exhausted.
Thanks.
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
Linux 3.11.1-300.fc20.x86_64
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 17:10 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 08:36 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 20:31 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> On 09/18/2013 02:30 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 09:03 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 20:31 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 02:30 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 09:03 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> On 09/17/2013 09:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Aaron, how about fix indicator on ThinkPa
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 09:03 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 09:34 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 17:23 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> v1 has the subject of "Rework ACPI video driver" and is posted here:
> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/20
face created by i915) is available and then do
> things accordingly(e.g. avoid register its own on Win8 systems).
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 31 +++
> include/linux/backlight.h
5 +-
> drivers/acpi/video.c| 442
>
> drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 14 +-
> drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 31 +++
> include/acpi/video.h| 2 +
> include/linux/backlight.h |
ous work done by Matthew Garrett,
> Chun-Yi Lee, Seth Forshee and Rafael J. Wysocki.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
> ---
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 ++---
> drivers/acpi/video.c| 27 +--
> drivers/acpi/video
ty without affecting the other one.
>
> APIs to selectively remove backlight control interface and/or event
> delivery functionality can be easily added once needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
> ---
> drivers/acpi/video.c | 451
> ++
s of Matthew Garrett,
> Chun-Yi Lee and Seth Forshee and is heavily based on two patches
> from Rafael:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/17/720
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/24/806
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
> ---
> drivers/acpi/internal.h
eo devices belonging to stored video buses.
>
> Currently, there is no need to unregister ACPI video's event delivery
> functionality alone so the function acpi_video_remove_notify_handler is
> not introduced, it can be easily added when needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Te
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 13:16 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 01:13 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 11:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> On 09/09/2013 07:44 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:42 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 11:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 07:44 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:42 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> >> index f46698
gpu/drm] Error 2
DEBUG: make[1]: *** [drivers/gpu] Error 2
DEBUG: make: *** [drivers] Error 2
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
Linux 3.11.0-3.fc20.x86_64
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
gt; (that may take a while) and flip the defailt for that option to set when
> we
> think we're ready.
> (4) If there still are problem reports, flip the default back to unset and
> repeat (3).
>
> If this converges, everyone will be using the native backligh
gt; (that may take a while) and flip the defailt for that option to set when
> we
> think we're ready.
> (4) If there still are problem reports, flip the default back to unset and
> repeat (3).
>
> If this converges, everyone will be using the native backlight control by
> default and the original problem will go away automatically.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Rafael
>
>
Good idea. I have 3-4 laptops with this problem. I can test, but I don't
have devices, on which found regressions (in backlight) in previous
patch.
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 19 (Schr?dinger?s Cat)
Linux 3.10.3-300.fc19.x86_64
ed by
acpi_video_init_brightness() if we are not going to use it.]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/vi
an earlier patch from Seth Forshee.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 13 -
include/acpi/acpixf.h | 1 +
include/acpi/actypes.h| 15 +++
3 files changed
ed by
acpi_video_init_brightness() if we are not going to use it.]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/vi
an earlier patch from Seth Forshee.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 13 -
include/acpi/acpixf.h | 1 +
include/acpi/actypes.h| 15 +++
3 files changed
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 13:38 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 09:16:38 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 00:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 05:08:16 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 13:38 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 09:16:38 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 00:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 05:08:16 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 00:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 05:08:16 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:32 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > Hmm. I found regression in user-space. In GNOME (maybe and other DEs) we
> > >
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 00:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 05:08:16 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:32 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > Hmm. I found regression in user-space. In GNOME (maybe and other DEs) we
> > >
Hmm. I found regression in user-space. In GNOME (maybe and other DEs) we no
longer see switch status of backlight.
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
Linux 3.11.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc20.x86_64
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 01:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 05:06:09 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 02:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > I can't build it. Where did I go wrong?
>
> Prob
Hmm. I found regression in user-space. In GNOME (maybe and other DEs) we no
longer see switch status of backlight.
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 19 (Schr?dinger?s Cat)
Linux 3.11.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc20.x86_64
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 01:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 15, 2013 05:06:09 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 02:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > I can't build it. Where did I go wrong?
>
> Prob
:41:0:
drivers/acpi/internal.h:174:60: note: previous definition of
'acpi_video_backlight_quirks' was here
static inline bool acpi_video_backlight_quirks(void) { return false; }
^
drivers/acpi/video_dete
:41:0:
drivers/acpi/internal.h:174:60: note: previous definition of
'acpi_video_backlight_quirks' was here
static inline bool acpi_video_backlight_quirks(void) { return false; }
^
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c: In function 'acpi_video_backlight_quirks':
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c:241:6: error: 'acpi_gbl_osi_data' undeclared
(first use in this function)
if (acpi_gbl_osi_data >= ACPI_OSI_WIN_8) {
^
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c:241:6: note: each undeclared identifier is
reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c:241:27: error: 'ACPI_OSI_WIN_8' undeclared
(first use in this function)
if (acpi_gbl_osi_data >= ACPI_OSI_WIN_8) {
^
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c: At top level:
drivers/acpi/video_detect.c:295:6: error: redefinition of
'acpi_video_verify_backlight_support'
bool acpi_video_verify_backlight_support(void)
^
In file included from drivers/acpi/video_detect.c:41:0:
drivers/acpi/internal.h:175:60: note: previous definition of
'acpi_video_verify_backlight_support' was here
static inline bool acpi_video_verify_backlight_support(void) { return
false; }
^
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 19 (Schr?dinger?s Cat)
Linux 3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64
42 matches
Mail list logo
