Thank you. I am looking at the problem now.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 1:37 AM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 06/10/2024 à 18:56, Christian Zigotzky a écrit :
> > On 03 October 2024 at 08:06 am, Wu Hoi Pok wrote:
> >> This is a fix patch not tested yet,
> >> for a bug I introduce in previous rewo
Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Le 01/10/2024 à 14:09, Hoi Pok Wu a écrit :
> > [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de wuhoi...@gmail.com. Découvrez
> > pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
> > ]
> >
> >
I will look into this and get back to you. Thank you.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 8:23 PM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Le 01/10/2024 à 14:09, Hoi Pok Wu a écrit :
> > [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de wuhoi...@gmail.com. Découvrez
> > pourquoi ce
Hi Thomas,
Could you help on this issue?
I do not have access to the hardware now.
Thank you.
Regards,
Wu Hoi Pok
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 12:26 PM Christian Zigotzky
wrote:
>
> On 30 September 2024 3:27pm, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> + Wu Hoi Pok
>
> This is likely related to the drm device rewor
Thanks a lot for your help Thomas.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:52 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 30.06.24 um 18:59 schrieb Wu Hoi Pok:
> > .load and drm_dev_alloc are deprecated. These patch series aims to
> > remove them.
> >
> > v3: Both v1 and v2 sucks. v3 improves greatly on readabili
Dear Thmoas,
Thanks a lot for the feedback.
I admit that my patch was a mess, sorry about that.
I have submitted a v3 to change a lot of stuff, these patches should
be able to be built now.
I also improve readability, where each patch does their own stuff.
Best regards,
Wu
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024
Thank you. I have resubmitted with a cover letter.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 3:22 AM Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 21.06.24 um 16:15 schrieb Wu Hoi Pok:
> > This is "drm/radeon: remove load callback" v2, the only changes
> > were made are adding "ddev->dev_private = rdev;", right after
> >
Dear Thomas,
Thank you for testing my patch. The dev->dev_private is indeed the problem.
However, most of the functions that uses dev->dev_private is passing
drm_device as parameter, and then uses dev->dev_private to retrieve
radeon_device,
contradicting what the patch intended. It should use rad
et anybody looking into this, but the odds that
> somebody has time and hardware are pretty low.
>
> Christian.
>
> Am 07.06.24 um 16:15 schrieb Hoi Pok Wu:
> > i do it because it is part of the todo list
> > where the task is to remove load/unload callback
> >
i do it because it is part of the todo list
where the task is to remove load/unload callback
there are only 2 drm_driver that still uses thats why
i thought my amdgpu could test radeonsi but no, i still send it anyway
regards,
wu
On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 3:51 AM Christian König wrote:
>
> Am 07.0
10 matches
Mail list logo
