[Public]
Reviewed-by: Kenny Ho
[Public]
On 5/30/23 11:24, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> I am able to get clean builds with this enabled on GCC 11-13 and Clang
> 15, at least as of commit e786aef0869c ("drm/amd/display: remove unused
> definition") on amd-staging-drm-next.
Did you try intentionally introducing a warning to see if the
: Russell, Kent ; Ho, Kenny ;
Mahfooz, Hamza ; Li, Sun peng (Leo)
; Wentland, Harry ; Pan, Xinhui
; Siqueira, Rodrigo ;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org ;
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org ;
amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org ; Daniel Vetter
; Deucher, Alexander ; David Airlie
; Koenig, Christian
Subject: Re
3:22 PM
To: Mahfooz, Hamza
Cc: amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org ; Li, Sun peng
(Leo) ; Ho, Kenny ; Pan, Xinhui
; Siqueira, Rodrigo ;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org ;
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org ; Daniel
Vetter ; Deucher, Alexander ; David
Airlie ; Wentland, Harry ; Koenig,
Christian
Subject
we can, why not
allow non-work-conserving implementation first, especially when we have users
asking for such functionality?
Regards,
Kenny
From: Tejun Heo on behalf of Tejun Heo
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 3:11 PM
To: Kenny Ho
Cc: Ho, Kenny ; cgro...@vger.ke
his function.)
Kenny
From: Tuikov, Luben
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 2:19 PM
To: Nirmoy Das ; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Zhou, David(ChunMing) ; thellst...@vmware.com
; airl...@linux.ie ; Ho, Kenny
; brian.we...@intel.com ;
maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.
> That combined with the "GPU memory usable" property should be a good
> > > > > starting point to start subdividing the GPU resources for multiple
> > > > > users.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards, Joonas
> > >
a good
> > > starting point to start subdividing the GPU resources for multiple
> > > users.
> > >
> > > Regards, Joonas
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Your feedback is highly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regard
" property should be a good
> starting point to start subdividing the GPU resources for multiple
> users.
>
> Regards, Joonas
>
> >
> > Your feedback is highly appreciated.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Harish
> >
> >
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 1:13 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
> Am 23.11.18 um 18:36 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> > Christian König writes:
> >> Am 20.11.18 um 21:57 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> >>> Kenny Ho writes:
> Account for the number of command submitted to amdgpu by type on a per
> cgroup basi
(resending because previous email switched to HTML mode and was filtered out)
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +0000, Ho, Kenny wrote:
> > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources
> > will neve
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:21:14PM +0000, Ho, Kenny wrote:
> > By this reply, are you suggesting that vendor specific resources
> > will never be acceptable to be managed under cgroup? Let say a user
>
> I w
Hi Tejun,
Thanks for the reply. A few clarifying questions:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:21 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, I'm still pretty negative about adding drm controller at this
> point. There isn't enough of common resource model defined yet and
> until that gets sorted out I think it's in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
