On 2/23/20 4:07 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
+static int kd35t133_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
+{
+ struct kd35t133 *ctx = panel_to_kd35t133(panel);
+ struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!ctx->prepared)
+ return 0
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:04 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> It's (almost, there's some iommu stuff without significance) right
> above the drm_dev_put().
>
> This is made possible by a preceeding patch which added a drmm_
> cleanup action to drm_mode_config_init(), hence all we need to do to
> ensur
On 02/28/2013 11:24 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This will allow me to call functions that have multiple arguments if fastpath
> fails.
> This is required to support ticket mutexes, because they need to be able to
> pass an
> extra argument to the fail function.
>
> Originally I duplicated the
On 02/28/2013 11:24 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This will allow me to call functions that have multiple arguments if fastpath
> fails.
> This is required to support ticket mutexes, because they need to be able to
> pass an
> extra argument to the fail function.
>
> Originally I duplicated the
On 01/23/2013 03:56 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Thanks for the review, how does this delta look?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h
> index d9f091d..831ed0a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fence.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,10 @@ struct fence_cb;
> *
On 01/23/2013 03:56 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Thanks for the review, how does this delta look?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h
> index d9f091d..831ed0a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fence.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,10 @@ struct fence_cb;
> *
On 01/15/2013 01:34 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This adds support for a generic reservations framework that can be
> hooked up to ttm and dma-buf and allows easy sharing of reservations
> across devices.
>
> The idea is that a dma-buf and ttm object both will get a pointer
> to a struct reserva
Hi,
On 01/15/2013 01:34 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..d9f091d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/fence.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
> +/*
> + * Fence mechanism for dma-buf to allow for asynchronou
On 01/15/2013 01:34 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This adds support for a generic reservations framework that can be
> hooked up to ttm and dma-buf and allows easy sharing of reservations
> across devices.
>
> The idea is that a dma-buf and ttm object both will get a pointer
> to a struct reserva
Hi,
On 01/15/2013 01:34 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..d9f091d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/fence.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
> +/*
> + * Fence mechanism for dma-buf to allow for asynchronou
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.sem...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> +
Hi,
On 12/14/2012 10:36 AM, sumit.semwal at ti.com wrote:
> From: Sumit Semwal
>
> Add debugfs support to make it easier to print debug information
> about the dma-buf buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal
> ---
> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 149
> ++
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
[Snip]
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..e0ceddd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> +/*
> + * Fence mechanism for dma-buf
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
[Snip]
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..e0ceddd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> +/*
> + * Fence mechanism for dma-buf
14 matches
Mail list logo
