Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Update license on selftest lists to MIT

2024-12-13 Thread Ed Maste
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 02:25, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 06:19:00PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 03:17:27PM +0000, Ed Maste wrote: > > > These two files (i915_live_selftests.h, i915_mock_selftests.h) were > > > introduced in

[PATCH] drm/i915: Update license on selftest lists to MIT

2024-12-08 Thread Ed Maste
ommit here that these files are a trivial part of an otherwise MIT-licensed patch to a MIT-licensed component, and should have an MIT license. Signed-off-by: Ed Maste --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_mock_selftests.h | 2 +- 2 fil

[PATCH] drm.h: Handle DragonFly like Linux

2016-05-17 Thread Ed Maste
On 17 May 2016 at 01:26, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > FreeBSD and NetBSD even have two different drm.h kernel headers. For some > reason they think it is a good idea to keep a separate drm implementation > from ~= 10 years ago or so. No, we (FreeBSD) don't think it's a good idea. It's an unfortunat