Re: [PATCH net-next v16 02/13] net: netdev netlink api to bind dma-buf to a net device

2024-07-10 Thread Donald Hunter
Mina Almasry writes: > API takes the dma-buf fd as input, and binds it to the netdevice. The > user can specify the rx queues to bind the dma-buf to. > > Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev > Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry Reviewed-by: Donald Hunter

Re: [PATCH net-next v16 11/13] net: add devmem TCP documentation

2024-07-10 Thread Donald Hunter
Mina Almasry writes: > Add documentation outlining the usage and details of devmem TCP. > > Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry > Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya Reviewed-by: Donald Hunter

Re: [PATCH net-next v15 02/14] net: netdev netlink api to bind dma-buf to a net device

2024-07-02 Thread Donald Hunter
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 20:05, Mina Almasry wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 3:10 AM Donald Hunter wrote: > > > > Mina Almasry writes: > > > + - > > > +name: bind-dmabuf > > > +attributes: > > > + - > > > +n

Re: [PATCH net-next v15 12/14] net: add devmem TCP documentation

2024-06-28 Thread Donald Hunter
Mina Almasry writes: > + > +The user must bind a dmabuf to any number of RX queues on a given NIC using > +the netlink API:: > + > + /* Bind dmabuf to NIC RX queue 15 */ > + struct netdev_queue *queues; > + queues = malloc(sizeof(*queues) * 1); > + > + queues[0]._present.type = 1;

Re: [PATCH net-next v15 02/14] net: netdev netlink api to bind dma-buf to a net device

2024-06-28 Thread Donald Hunter
Mina Almasry writes: > + - > +name: bind-dmabuf > +attributes: > + - > +name: ifindex > +doc: netdev ifindex to bind the dma-buf to. Minor nit: The series uses a mix of dmabuf and dma-buf but the doc additions (devmem.rst) consistently uses dmabuf. I think it would

Re: [PATCH v2] Fix duplicate C declaration warnings

2024-03-26 Thread Donald Hunter
Akira Yokosawa writes: > > That message of mine just pointed out that the Sphinx bug of false > duplicate C declaration warning first reported by Mauro (+CC'd) at: > https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/8241 -- > "C domain issues when building the Linux Kernel documentation". > It had not b