Regression in v4.8-rc4: i915 flickering since commit 1c80c25fb6

2016-09-04 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hi! Since commit 1c80c25fb6 (determined by git bisect, and confirmed by reverting this patch on top of 9ca581b50d), the sceen on my DELL XPS 13 is flickering every once in a while (sometimes multiple times per second, sometimes only every few seconds). That's for 00:02.0 VGA compatible controlle

Thunderbolt, Apple Monitor & MBA, and excess kworker load

2012-06-21 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:10:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:56:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:48:42PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > At work, I wish to attach a 27"

Re: Thunderbolt, Apple Monitor & MBA, and excess kworker load

2012-06-21 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:10:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:56:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:48:42PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > At work, I wish to attach a 27"

Thunderbolt, Apple Monitor & MBA, and excess kworker load

2012-06-20 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hi, At work, I wish to attach a 27" Apple Display using thunderbolt to my Mac Book Air 4,2 13". Using OS X, it works fine, but as I prefer using Linux, I tested out Ubuntu's stock kernel and (among other) 3.5.0-rc3+ as of f40759e. Hotplug doesn't work (known issue), but also with coldplug the disp

Thunderbolt, Apple Monitor & MBA, and excess kworker load

2012-06-20 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hi, At work, I wish to attach a 27" Apple Display using thunderbolt to my Mac Book Air 4,2 13". Using OS X, it works fine, but as I prefer using Linux, I tested out Ubuntu's stock kernel and (among other) 3.5.0-rc3+ as of f40759e. Hotplug doesn't work (known issue), but also with coldplug the disp

2.6.39-rc1 nouveau(?) regression (bisected)

2011-04-22 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:47:47PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:27:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Marcin Slusarz > > wrote: > > > > > > It's some nasty corruption: > > > > Looks like something wrote 0x to free'd memory.

Re: 2.6.39-rc1 nouveau(?) regression (bisected)

2011-04-22 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:47:47PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:27:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Marcin Slusarz > > wrote: > > > > > > It's some nasty corruption: > > > > Looks like something wrote 0x to free'd memory.

2.6.39-rc1 nouveau regression (bisected)

2011-04-17 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:12:35AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > On 15/04/11 16:11, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > >>> Tho

Re: 2.6.39-rc1 nouveau regression (bisected)

2011-04-17 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:12:35AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > On 15/04/11 16:11, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > >>> Tho

2.6.39-rc1 nouveau regression (bisected)

2011-04-15 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > Thought about CCing Linus to show him that 2.6.39-rcX isn't as "calm" > > to everyone, but then chose to CC Maciej instead: Would y

Re: 2.6.39-rc1 nouveau regression (bisected)

2011-04-14 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > Thought about CCing Linus to show him that 2.6.39-rcX isn't as "calm" > > to everyone, but then chose to CC Maciej instead: Would y

2.6.39-rc1 nouveau regression (bisected)

2011-04-14 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Thought about CCing Linus to show him that 2.6.39-rcX isn't as "calm" to everyone, but then chose to CC Maciej instead: Would you be so kind and add this to your regression list? Thanks! Since commit 38f1cff From: Dave Airlie Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:34:41 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Mer

2.6.39-rc1 nouveau regression (bisected)

2011-04-14 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Thought about CCing Linus to show him that 2.6.39-rcX isn't as "calm" to everyone, but then chose to CC Maciej instead: Would you be so kind and add this to your regression list? Thanks! Since commit 38f1cff From: Dave Airlie Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:34:41 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Mer

2.6.39-rc1 noveau trouble and regression (bad commit: 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c )

2011-04-07 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, still no joy with 2.6.39-rc2. Best, Dominik On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 08:12:06PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hey, > > After bisecting for a day, I'm pretty confident that the commit > 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c introduced an error which &

Re: 2.6.39-rc1 noveau trouble and regression (bad commit: 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c )

2011-04-07 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, still no joy with 2.6.39-rc2. Best, Dominik On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 08:12:06PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hey, > > After bisecting for a day, I'm pretty confident that the commit > 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c introduced an error which &

2.6.39-rc1 noveau trouble and regression (bad commit: 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c )

2011-04-04 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, After bisecting for a day, I'm pretty confident that the commit 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c introduced an error which causes one of my computers to hang during boot -- only a blank screen appears. The initramfs never gets run. The system consists of an Atom D525 with Intel NM10

2.6.39-rc1 noveau trouble and regression (bad commit: 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c )

2011-04-03 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, After bisecting for a day, I'm pretty confident that the commit 38f1cff0863809587b5fd10ecd0c24c8b543a48c introduced an error which causes one of my computers to hang during boot -- only a blank screen appears. The initramfs never gets run. The system consists of an Atom D525 with Intel NM10