On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> On March 16, 2017 5:41:24 PM Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>
>> On 17 March 2017 at 00:21, Dylan Baker wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Emil,
>>>
>>> Quoting Emil Velikov (2017-03-16 16:35:33)
>>>
While I can see you're impressed by Meson, I would kindly ur
; *
> * Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Brian Paul All Rights Reserved.<--- ???
> * Copyright (C) 2009 VMware, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
What's the question there?
-Brian
On 02/14/2013 01:10 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi,
noticed when polishing up my build-scripts fot libdrm | mesa |
xf86-video-intel (last one requires gl.h).
/*
* Mesa 3-D graphics library
* Version: 7.6<--- ???
I could remove that obsolete line.
*
* Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Br
On 01/17/2013 04:23 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with the following patchset (13 patches) I was able to build
> mesa-8.0.5 with LLVM v3.2.
>
> There is one big fat patch called "gallivm,draw,llvmpipe: Support
> wider native registers." [1] which makes backporting hard.
> Jose?
>
> Regards,
> -
On 01/17/2013 02:14 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am playing again with llvm/clang v3.2 and patches I adapted from
> LLVMLinux project.
>
> I wanted to test my new toolchain before doing a rough testing of the
> mainline Linux-kernel.
>
> I decided to build the latest mesa-8.0.5 as I am on Ubun
On 01/17/2013 04:23 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi,
with the following patchset (13 patches) I was able to build
mesa-8.0.5 with LLVM v3.2.
There is one big fat patch called "gallivm,draw,llvmpipe: Support
wider native registers." [1] which makes backporting hard.
Jose?
Regards,
- Sedat -
[1] http
On 01/17/2013 02:14 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi
I am playing again with llvm/clang v3.2 and patches I adapted from
LLVMLinux project.
I wanted to test my new toolchain before doing a rough testing of the
mainline Linux-kernel.
I decided to build the latest mesa-8.0.5 as I am on Ubuntu/precise
AM
On 06/21/2011 09:28 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Hi
>
> The following patch fixes building mesa from tarball (generated from git):
> - one Makefile disappeared (Makefile.template)
> - two other were missing (src/mesa/drivers/dri/Makefile.{defines,targets}
Committed. Thanks.
-Brian
On 06/21/2011 09:28 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Hi
The following patch fixes building mesa from tarball (generated from git):
- one Makefile disappeared (Makefile.template)
- two other were missing (src/mesa/drivers/dri/Makefile.{defines,targets}
Committed. Thanks.
-Brian
___
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alex Buell wrote:
> The patch below is needed to prevent building mesa with libdrm <
> 2.4.24.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 6662b8a..ad9eb01 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_AU
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alex Buell wrote:
> The patch below is needed to prevent building mesa with libdrm <
> 2.4.24.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 6662b8a..ad9eb01 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_AU
On 04/28/2011 12:38 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> On 19 April 2011 16:35, Brian wrote:
Pushed, thanks.
>>>
>>> Can you know commit this one that fixes missing files in the generated
>>> tarball
>>> so that one can build mesa out of the tarball?
>>> Thx
>>
>> I'll commit it soon. Thanks.
>
> H
On 04/28/2011 12:38 AM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
On 19 April 2011 16:35, Brian wrote:
Pushed, thanks.
Can you know commit this one that fixes missing files in the generated
tarball
so that one can build mesa out of the tarball?
Thx
I'll commit it soon. Thanks.
Hi
The following patch fix ta
Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> +static inline GLint r600_log2(GLint n)
>>> +{
>>> + GLint log2 = 0;
>>> +
>>> + while (n >>= 1)
>>> + ++log2;
>>> + return log2;
>>> +}
>> Does mesa not provide something like this?
>
>
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
+static inline GLint r600_log2(GLint n)
+{
+ GLint log2 = 0;
+
+ while (n >>= 1)
+ ++log2;
+ return log2;
+}
Does mesa not provide something like this?
The only one I could find was a gal
Conn Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a possible fix/hack to get _mesa_remove_extra_moves function
> in shader/prog_optimize.c usable. As far as I could tell with my
> testing there was an issue with this optimizing pass and OPCODE_MUL .
> I just added an exception to for this one instruction and
Conn Clark wrote:
Hello,
Here is a possible fix/hack to get _mesa_remove_extra_moves function
in shader/prog_optimize.c usable. As far as I could tell with my
testing there was an issue with this optimizing pass and OPCODE_MUL .
I just added an exception to for this one instruction and made it e
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
>> Matthew W. S. Bell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 16:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:38:03 -0400
>>>> Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>>
&
Matthew W. S. Bell wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 16:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:38:03 -0400
>> Alex Deucher wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
>>>> Unless there's some objection I'm go
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
Matthew W. S. Bell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 16:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:38:03 -0400
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
Unless there's some obje
Matthew W. S. Bell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 16:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:38:03 -0400
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
Unless there's some objection I'm going to subscribe everyone to the
new FD.O-based mesa-dev ma
21 matches
Mail list logo