[Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Bobby Powers
Hi Daniel, This tree gives me recursive dependency problems, which ends up removing a big (& important) part of my .config: [bpowers at fina linux]$ git reset --hard drm-intel-next-2012-09-09 HEAD is now at e04190e drm/fb helper: don't call drm_helper_connector_dpms directly [bpowers at fina linu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix infinite recursion on unbind due to ilk vt-d w/a

2011-12-10 Thread Bobby Powers
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Bobby Powers wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Bobby Powers wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:12:33PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> The recursion loop goes ret

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix infinite recursion on unbind due to ilk vt-d w/a

2011-12-10 Thread Bobby Powers
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Bobby Powers wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:12:33PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> The recursion loop goes retire_requests->unbind->gpu_idle->retire_reqeusts. >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix infinite recursion on unbind due to ilk vt-d w/a

2011-12-10 Thread Bobby Powers
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:12:33PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> The recursion loop goes retire_requests->unbind->gpu_idle->retire_reqeusts. >> >> Every time we go through this we need a >> - active object that can be retired >> - and there a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix infinite recursion on unbind due to ilk vt-d w/a

2011-12-09 Thread Bobby Powers
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Bobby Powers wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Bobby Powers > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:12:33PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> The recursion loop goes

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix infinite recursion on unbind due to ilk vt-d w/a

2011-12-09 Thread Bobby Powers
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Bobby Powers wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:12:33PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> The recursion loop goes retire_requests->unbind->gpu_idle->retire_reqeusts. >>>

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix infinite recursion on unbind due to ilk vt-d w/a

2011-12-08 Thread Bobby Powers
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:12:33PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> The recursion loop goes retire_requests->unbind->gpu_idle->retire_reqeusts. >> >> Every time we go through this we need a >> - active object that can be retired >> - and there a