On 02/09/2021 08:43, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 07:19 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
I have a question though - why all of DRM is not !UML in config. Not
like we can use them.
I have no idea about that.
Hopefully one of the (other) UML maintainers can answer you.
Touche.
We
ellström
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Huang Rui
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jeff Dike
Cc: Richard Weinberger
Cc: Anton Ivanov
Cc: linux...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_module.c |4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- l
On 02/09/2021 06:52, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 9/1/21 10:48 PM, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 02/09/2021 03:01, Randy Dunlap wrote:
boot_cpu_data [struct cpuinfo_um (on UML)] does not have a struct
member named 'x86', so provide a default page protection mode
for CONFIG_UML.
Mends this b
+---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
I do not recall reviewing this.
I think you got the wrong Anton Ivanov - I maintain UML so the previous
revision hit someone's else inbox.
--
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Compan
On 30/11/2018 03:14, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:18AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
+#define module_test(module) \
+ static int module_kunit_init##module(void) \
+ { \
+ return kunit_run_tests(&module); \
+
On 05/12/2018 14:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:42 PM Anton Ivanov
wrote:
On 30/11/2018 03:14, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:18AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
Then for the UML stuff, I think if we *really* accept that UML will
always be a viable
