Re: [PATCH v6 12/14] drm/edp-panel: Add LG Display panel model LP079QX1-SP0V

2025-01-25 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:18 PM Damon Ding wrote: > > >>> #define EDP_PANEL_ENTRY(vend_chr_0, vend_chr_1, vend_chr_2, product_id, > >>> _delay, _name) \ > >>> { \ > >>>.ident = { \ > >>> @@ -1955,6 +1961,8 @@ static const struct edp_panel_entry edp_panels[] = { > >>>EDP_P

[PATCH v2] drm/virtio: Align host mapping request to maximum platform page size

2025-01-25 Thread Sasha Finkelstein via B4 Relay
From: Sasha Finkelstein This allows running different page sizes between host and guest on platforms that support mixed page sizes. Signed-off-by: Sasha Finkelstein --- Changes in v2: - Aligned all object sizes to MAX_PAGE_SIZE too. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109-virtgpu-mixe

Re: [PATCH] drm/print: Include drm_device.h

2025-01-25 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 18:09:25 -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote: > The header drm_print.h uses members of struct drm_device pointers, as > such, it should include drm_device.h to let the compiler know the full > type definition. > > Without such include, users of drm_print.h that don't explicitly need >

Re: [PATCH RFT 0/2] drm/bridge: Use per-client debugfs entry

2025-01-25 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 01:53:20PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > The I2C core now offers a debugfs-directory per client. Use it and > remove the custom handling in drm bridge drivers. I don't have the > hardware, so I hope I can find people willing to test here. Build bots > are happy. And for it650

[linus:master] [drm/tests] 2735d5e406: WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c:#drm_framebuffer_init[drm]

2025-01-25 Thread kernel test robot
rted-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202501252016.6c6827cb-...@intel.com The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250125/202501252016.6c6827cb-...@intel.com [ 152.345485][ T4774] --

[PATCH RFT 0/2] drm/bridge: Use per-client debugfs entry

2025-01-25 Thread Wolfram Sang
The I2C core now offers a debugfs-directory per client. Use it and remove the custom handling in drm bridge drivers. I don't have the hardware, so I hope I can find people willing to test here. Build bots are happy. And for it6505, it even fixes a problem. See the patch description there. Looking

[PATCH RFT 1/2] drm/bridge: it6505: Use per-client debugfs entry

2025-01-25 Thread Wolfram Sang
The I2C core now offers a debugfs-directory per client. Use it and remove the custom handling. This also fixes the problem of a static debugfs dir name which would break if two of these devices would be on one system. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 28 +++--

[PATCH RFT 2/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Use per-client debugfs entry

2025-01-25 Thread Wolfram Sang
The I2C core now offers a debugfs-directory per client. Use it and remove the custom handling. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 29 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86