On 28 June 2016 at 16:59, Vinay Simha wrote:
> hi,
>
> Any further comments or reviews?
>
You still haven't covered my earlier suggestions, as such I cannot
give you a r-b :-( They are not blockers by any means, but it'll be
up-to the maintainer to ack/pick this up.
Thierry ?
Regards,
Emil
Hi Bibby,
On 27 June 2016 at 12:29, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 12:20 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 06/24/2016 09:27 AM, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
>> > Hi Dave,
>> >
>> > Please consider merging this tag, which contains the v2 MT8173 gamma &
>> > dither function patches I sent
:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160703/58d34f11/attachment-0001.html>
ware)
mesa/libdrm/llvm/xf86-video-amdgpu are all built from git
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160703/d6d5f005/attachment.html>
something that might have fixed this? Or just luck?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160703/90217f85/attachment.html>
receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160703/e4e97041/attachment.html>
ee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20160703/d20a26ee/attachment.html>
This is likely that checking 'gr3d->clk_secondary' instead of 'gr3d->clk'
is expected here.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gr3d.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gr3d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gr3d.c
inde
Hi Dave,
A few amdkfd patches for 4.8. One patch replaces deprecated kernel api call
(create_workqueue) and the other patch properly cleans up resources in case of
failing to create a process object.
Thanks,
Oded
The following changes since commit dac2c48ca5ac9bb2d6339aaa733c60d5b801ee86:
On 07/03/2016 07:37 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> This is likely that checking 'phy_provider' instead of 'phy' is
> expected here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/driv
This is likely that checking 'phy_provider' instead of 'phy' is
expected here.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_m
11 matches
Mail list logo