URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/48332ef1/attachment.html>
Hi Laurent,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> On Friday 14 December 2012 16:27:26 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been testing Common Display Framework on OMAP, and making changes
>> that I've discussed in the posts I've sent in reply to the CDF ser
.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/b0dc12cb/attachment.html>
report
(and if so: Where) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/aa997b50/attachment.html>
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/98b9adcf/attachment.html>
report
(and if so: Where) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/7e7df023/attachment.html>
report
(and if so: Where) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/989fde55/attachment.html>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58659
--- Comment #4 from Bryan Quigley ---
Reverting patch 2d6cc729 does indeed fix the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-dev
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:28:25PM -0500, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alex Deucher
>
> Seems to fall over in some cases with heavy memory thrashing on
> 6xx. Needs more investigation after the holidays, disable for
> now.
>
> Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
> Signed-
e bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/6fcf7b21/attachment.html>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #12 from smoki ---
Yeah i tried your patch and it works, thanks Raphal. Someone could pushed it
in git if it's in good looking now ;).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/224ee2fe/attachment.html>
HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/f9b23b54/attachment.html>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #11 from Rafał Mużyło ---
Created attachment 72051
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=72051&action=edit
attachment 72047 as patch for r200/radeon
@comment 9: your own attachment says it was not.
Anyway, attachment 7
s and maybe more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/b4801019/attachment.html>
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/13a1ca60/attachment-0001.html>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58696
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 58696
Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: Choppy video playback in VLC with R600g on Radeon HD
6620G
Severity: normal
Classificati
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
smoki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #72050|text/plain |image/png
mime type|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #10 from smoki ---
Created attachment 72050
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=72050&action=edit
STK minimap icon
He, he, i'am not programmer at all ;) but i managed to fix fogcoords, lighting
and culling on rv280
mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/43faaa4e/attachment.html>
builds thought :/.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/11372cc5/attachment.html>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #9 from smoki ---
That Dänzer's commit is good, it inverts winding properly and it works good
but for swtcl only. My tries to make it work but for both swtcl and tcl, and
for Stefan's test case also.
And it works for me both swtcl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #8 from Rafał Mużyło ---
...minor correction: that r300 was for the non-galium driver (that was removed
awhile ago), but it seems that the logic in that commit was incorrect, so the
"hack" from that attachement seems to be a logic fix
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #7 from Rafał Mużyło ---
Perhaps the message in this commit
(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_state.c?id=60e60bb3026a269fefe1cfd3312fdf3a7e4c595f)
is of note:
Tested with r300, radeon and r2
2012/12/8 :
> Alex Deucher (6):
> drm/radeon/dce3.2: add registers for ELD handling
> drm/radeon/dce4/5: add registers for ELD handling
Sorry, I can't reply to the any of above patches.
Alex: can we also get definition of (1 << 20) bit for
AZ_HOT_PLUG_CONTROL? Just my curiosity :)
-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Dösinger ---
I'll give the patch a try after the holidays. My I'm currently 100 miles away
from my r200-equipped laptop and won't have access to it until Wednesday or
Thursday.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #5 from smoki ---
Created attachment 72047
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=72047&action=edit
Myr200FrontFace
Seems like i managed to fix it, but with dirty hack... see function in
attachment. tcl somehow is not
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Right, let me try that and report back.
Yep, looks like reverting the above commit fixes it - the boston.com
website loads just fine.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58667
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Rohloff ---
I was to fast with this. While the error messages in dmesg are gone it still
randomly crashes, but this time the computer just froze completely. I think
this bug report are in fact at least two bugs.
--
Y
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58667
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Rohloff ---
Bisected mesa.
This is a mesa bug caused by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=6532eb17baff6e61b427f29e076883f8941ae664
Can anybody move this to the right place or do I have to re-create the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58660
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Rohloff ---
Bisected mesa.
This is a mesa bug caused by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=6532eb17baff6e61b427f29e076883f8941ae664
Can anybody move this to the right place or do I have to re-create the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58661
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Rohloff ---
Bisected mesa.
This is a mesa bug caused by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=6532eb17baff6e61b427f29e076883f8941ae664
Can anybody move this to the right place or do I have to re-create the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58658
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Rohloff ---
Bisected mesa.
This is a mesa bug caused by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=6532eb17baff6e61b427f29e076883f8941ae664
Can anybody move this to the right place or do I have to re-create the
From: Alex Deucher
Seems to fall over in some cases with heavy memory thrashing on
6xx. Needs more investigation after the holidays, disable for
now.
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c |8
1 files cha
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:51:33PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> (If you don't use modules: git grep MODULE_PARM_DESC --
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ )
Yeah.
> You may have hit the same issue as I, see:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/78328
Yes, it very much looks like it
On 2012.12.23 at 12:31 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:19:00AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> > modinfo radeon
> >
> > will give a list assuming you use modules, I think all of them need =.
>
> Yep, that is one way of getting that info, thanks. I always go and look
> at D
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:19:00AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> modinfo radeon
>
> will give a list assuming you use modules, I think all of them need =.
Yep, that is one way of getting that info, thanks. I always go and look
at Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt and forget about modinfo.
As yo
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:01:37AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> no_wb=1 should work.
Yeah, maybe all those radeon and other GPU module parameters' syntax
should be documented somewhere - Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt for
example, or a GPU-specific file, whatever - so that we can save us all
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 07:42:16PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Does booting with radeon.wb=0 help?
Right, this param specification somehow didn't work here:
[0.00] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-rc1 root=/dev/sda1
ro vga=0 log_bug_len=10M resume=/dev/sda2 no_console_suspen
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58667
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Rohloff ---
But this crash was different: The image froze but the monitor didn't go into
standby nor came it back with garbage.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58667
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Rohloff ---
Crashes are still there after reverting "drm/radeon: use DMA engine for VM page
table updates on cayman/TN"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58660
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Rohloff ---
Whoever changed the report title: It is broken on the locked BIOS, not on the
unlocked.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58661
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Rohloff ---
To add some more to this bug report: Some things in Minecraft aren't rendered
at all: Water, Signs, Items (on the ground), all kind of mobs (animals,
monsters, ...), the selection ring around blocks and mayb
On 2012.12.23 at 10:09 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> >> Does booting with radeon.wb=0 fix the issue? Please make sure your
> >> kernel has this patch:
> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=86a1881d08f65a42c17071a59c0088dbe28
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:01:37AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
>> no_wb=1 should work.
>
> Yeah, maybe all those radeon and other GPU module parameters' syntax
> should be documented somewhere - Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt for
> example, or a GPU-specific file, whate
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58667
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Rohloff ---
Created attachment 72041
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=72041&action=edit
New dmesg output
Never mind, I found the patch here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux/commit/?h=drm-
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> [ 28.191072] radeon: `0' invalid for parameter `wb'
>
> although the whole driver blubber didn't appear on the console fterwards
> aso something got turned off allright.
>
> Then, I went and tried "radeon.no_wb" where the driver blubber appeared
> but AGP writeback was s
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:28:25PM -0500, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alex Deucher
>
> Seems to fall over in some cases with heavy memory thrashing on
> 6xx. Needs more investigation after the holidays, disable for
> now.
>
> Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
> Signed-off
receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/d68bd572/attachment-0001.html>
From: Alex Deucher
Seems to fall over in some cases with heavy memory thrashing on
6xx. Needs more investigation after the holidays, disable for
now.
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c |8
1 files cha
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58659
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher ---
Looks like this is probably a duplicate of this issue:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-December/032547.html
See if reverting commit 2d6cc729 fixes the problem.
--
You are receiving this
Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> Does booting with radeon.wb=0 fix the issue? Please make sure your
>> kernel has this patch:
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=86a1881d08f65a42c17071a59c0088dbe2870246
>
> My kernel has this patch and radeon.wb=0 doesn't h
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58659
--- Comment #2 from Bryan Quigley ---
My kernel build does have that patch.
Unfortunately, I am having trouble bisecting because something that appears
unrelated makes my system fail to boot. That boot failure already been fixed
in more recent
On 2012.12.22 at 20:46 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
> > On 2012.12.17 at 17:00 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 2012.12.17 at 16:32 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
2012/12/8 :
> Alex Deucher (6):
> drm/radeon/dce3.2: add registers for ELD handling
> drm/radeon/dce4/5: add registers for ELD handling
Sorry, I can't reply to the any of above patches.
Alex: can we also get definition of (1 << 20) bit for
AZ_HOT_PLUG_CONTROL? Just my curiosity :)
-
hould I open a new bug for it or has it been already
> reported?
Found something similar, it looks bug 58667.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/05f064a7/attachment.html>
RL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/7950bee0/attachment-0001.html>
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 01:22:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Right, let me try that and report back.
Yep, looks like reverting the above commit fixes it - the boston.com
website loads just fine.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:51:33PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> (If you don't use modules: git grep MODULE_PARM_DESC --
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ )
Yeah.
> You may have hit the same issue as I, see:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/78328
Yes, it very much looks like it
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/d7c6f7f6/attachment.html>
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 11:01 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > [ 28.191072] radeon: `0' invalid for parameter `wb'
> >
> > although the whole driver blubber didn't appear on the console fterwards
> > aso something got turned off allright.
> >
> > Then, I went and tried "ra
On 2012.12.23 at 12:31 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:19:00AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> > modinfo radeon
> >
> > will give a list assuming you use modules, I think all of them need =.
>
> Yep, that is one way of getting that info, thanks. I always go and look
> at D
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 11:01 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > [ 28.191072] radeon: `0' invalid for parameter `wb'
> >
> > although the whole driver blubber didn't appear on the console fterwards
> > aso something got turned off allright.
> >
> > Then, I went and tried "ra
...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/1e196cbc/attachment.html>
I don't think there is anything useful in there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/3c8fff12/attachment.html>
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:19:00AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> modinfo radeon
>
> will give a list assuming you use modules, I think all of them need =.
Yep, that is one way of getting that info, thanks. I always go and look
at Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt and forget about modinfo.
As yo
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:01:37AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
no_wb=1 should work.
Yeah, maybe all those radeon and other GPU module parameters' syntax
should be documented somewhere - Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt for
example, or a GPU-specific file, whatever - so
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:01:37AM +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> no_wb=1 should work.
Yeah, maybe all those radeon and other GPU module parameters' syntax
should be documented somewhere - Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt for
example, or a GPU-specific file, whatever - so that we can save us all
Borislav Petkov wrote:
[ 28.191072] radeon: `0' invalid for parameter `wb'
although the whole driver blubber didn't appear on the console fterwards
aso something got turned off allright.
Then, I went and tried "radeon.no_wb" where the driver blubber appeared
but AGP writeback was still enabl
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 07:42:16PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> Does booting with radeon.wb=0 help?
Right, this param specification somehow didn't work here:
[0.00] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-rc1 root=/dev/sda1
ro vga=0 log_bug_len=10M resume=/dev/sda2 no_console_suspen
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58666
Andreas Boll changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Drivers/DRI/R600|Drivers/Gallium/r600
--
You are receivin
Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
Does booting with radeon.wb=0 fix the issue? Please make sure your
kernel has this patch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=86a1881d08f65a42c17071a59c0088dbe2870246
My kernel has this patch and radeon.wb=0 doesn't help.
I
nee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/86e5d09e/attachment-0001.html>
On 2012.12.23 at 10:09 +, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> >> Does booting with radeon.wb=0 fix the issue? Please make sure your
> >> kernel has this patch:
> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=86a1881d08f65a42c17071a59c0088dbe28
r the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/6602d141/attachment.html>
s scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/b9977a91/attachment.html>
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 07:01:31PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> What chip is this?
I think it is RV635. Here's the whole 3.8-rc1 dmesg.
[0.00] Linux version 3.8.0-rc1 (boris at liondog) (gcc version 4.7.2
(Debian 4.7.2-4) ) #13 SMP PREEMPT Sat Dec 22 11:48:54 CET 2012
[0.00] Comm
or the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/912869c2/attachment.html>
On 2012.12.22 at 20:46 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
> > On 2012.12.17 at 17:00 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 2012.12.17 at 16:32 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
e bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/956588cc/attachment.html>
what to bisect (kernel or mesa) it may take some time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/fba28376/attachment.html>
what to bisect (kernel or mesa) it may take some time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/1893b740/attachment.html>
the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/a1e9b960/attachment.html>
the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/8e7cd8ab/attachment.html>
lying around somewhere. Let me search real quick.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/13ad34c4/attachment.html>
ttp://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/deeb9a25/attachment.html>
:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/d89a8e40/attachment-0001.html>
:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/efd9b9a0/attachment.html>
the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/df6fac42/attachment.html>
ving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121223/54b46f87/attachment.html>
90 matches
Mail list logo
