On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:10:53AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> >
> >> > You're right, of course -- UMS i
Hi Keith,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Keith Packard wrote:
>> Sorry, to me it all looked like "UMS is being ignored forever".
>
> You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
> this point, keeping it working while also adding new functionality
> continues to cause challenges. We
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39672
Vlado Plaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
From: Alex Deucher
Those chips have crt2_ddc bus.
Fixes:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39672
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/dr
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:41:17PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> This is the one use of an ida that doesn't retry on receiving -EAGAIN.
> I'm assuming do so will cause no harm and may help on a rare occasion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron
And all conversions seem correct to me. Please
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:41:19PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell
>
> The current hyper-optimized functions are overkill if you simply want
> to allocate an id for a device. Create versions which use an internal
> lock.
>
> Thanks to Tejun for feedback.
>
> Signed-off-by:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33371
--- Comment #8 from Lars Wendler 2011-07-23 11:43:41
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Are you by any chance using a 32 bit version of zsnes on a 64 bit distro?
> >
> > Yes I am. AFAI
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33371
--- Comment #8 from Lars Wendler 2011-07-23
11:43:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Are you by any chance using a 32 bit version of zsnes on a 64 bit distro?
> >
> > Yes I am. AFAI
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>
>> > You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
>> > this point, keeping it workin
From: Alex Deucher
Those chips have crt2_ddc bus.
Fixes:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39672
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/r
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39672
Vlado Plaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33371
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@whiz.se
--- Comment #7 from Sven A
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33371
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sa at whiz.se
--- Comment #7 from Sven
Hi Keith,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Keith Packard wrote:
Sorry, to me it all looked like "UMS is being ignored forever".
You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
this point, keeping it working while also adding new functionality
continues to cause challenges. We tend to
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>
>> > You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
>> > this point, keeping it workin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33371
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher 2011-07-23 08:06:23 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Are you by any chance using a 32 bit version of zsnes on a 64 bit distro?
>
> Yes I am. AFAIK there's no 64bit version of zsnes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33371
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher 2011-07-23 08:06:23 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Are you by any chance using a 32 bit version of zsnes on a 64 bit distro?
>
> Yes I am. AFAIK there's no 64bit version of zsnes
On 07/22/2011 09:41 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> This does involve additional use of the spin lock in idr.c.
> Is this an issue?
>
Actually it looks like a bug fix. I had a TODO: to add one.
> Also, some error mangling was needed to keep the interface
> the same. Does this matter or can we ret
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
> > this point, keeping it working while also adding new functionality
> > continues to cause c
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:23:36 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > What kind of a workaround are you talking about?
>
> Just reverting the commit -- that makes your machine work, even if it's
> wrong for other machines.
Yes, I could
Keith,
first of all thanks for your prompt reply. Then...
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:00:41AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:08:06 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > And now after v3.0 is out, I've tested it again, and yes, like it was
> > broken on v3.0-rc5, it is (now eve
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:41:17PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> This is the one use of an ida that doesn't retry on receiving -EAGAIN.
> I'm assuming do so will cause no harm and may help on a rare occasion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron
And all conversions seem correct to me. Please
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:41:19PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> From: Rusty Russell
>
> The current hyper-optimized functions are overkill if you simply want
> to allocate an id for a device. Create versions which use an internal
> lock.
>
> Thanks to Tejun for feedback.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
> > this point, keeping it working while also adding new functionality
> > continues to cause c
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:23:36 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > What kind of a workaround are you talking about?
>
> Just reverting the commit -- that makes your machine work, even if it's
> wrong for other machines.
Yes, I could
Keith,
first of all thanks for your prompt reply. Then...
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:00:41AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:08:06 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > And now after v3.0 is out, I've tested it again, and yes, like it was
> > broken on v3.0-rc5, it is (now eve
26 matches
Mail list logo
