https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36318
--- Comment #1 from Marek Olšák 2011-04-16 23:37:38 PDT ---
Try 'make clean'.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36318
--- Comment #1 from Marek Ol??k 2011-04-16 23:37:38 PDT
---
Try 'make clean'.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36318
Summary: r600g segfaults
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: medium
Component
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36318
Summary: r600g segfaults
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: medium
Component
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
--- Comment #12 from Mike Mestnik 2011-04-16 21:28:03
---
On 04/16/11 16:08, bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #11 from Adriano 2011-04-16
> 21:08:04
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
--- Comment #11 from Adriano 2011-04-16 21:08:04
---
An update: at least in my case, the problem seems to be related to page
flipping in the radeon driver. I have disabled page flipping in my xorg.conf
file and haven't seen the problem since
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:12:35AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> On 15/04/11 16:11, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 07:05:59PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> >>> Thought about CCing Linus to show him tha
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:11:28PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Do you also got the write if you load radeon with radeon.no_wb=1 ?
> I think at this address it's the wb page, or maybe the cp as wb likely
> take only one page
radeon.no_wb=1 makes no difference. The box still reboots.
Joer
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:11:28PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> Do you also got the write if you load radeon with radeon.no_wb=1 ?
>> I think at this address it's the wb page, or maybe the cp as wb likely
>> take only one page
>
> radeon.no
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
--- Comment #12 from Mike Mestnik 2011-04-16 21:28:03 ---
On 04/16/11 16:08, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #11 from Adriano 2011-04-16 21:08:04
> ---
* Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:06:41PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Alexandre Demers wrote:
> >
> > > On 11-04-15 10:27 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:16:59AM -0400, Alexandre Demers wrote:
> > > >> Ok, I'll test it today. Should I apply
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32402
--- Comment #11 from Adriano 2011-04-16 21:08:04 ---
An update: at least in my case, the problem seems to be related to page
flipping in the radeon driver. I have disabled page flipping in my xorg.conf
file and haven't seen the problem since.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:18:02PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 12:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > Joerg, mind submitting it with a changelog that includes everything we
> > learned
> > about this bug and all the Tested-by's in place?
> >
> > Is anyone of the opinion that we sh
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:06:41PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Alexandre Demers wrote:
>
> > On 11-04-15 10:27 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:16:59AM -0400, Alexandre Demers wrote:
> > >> Ok, I'll test it today. Should I apply it on a clean rc3 without any of
> > >>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:11:28PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> Do you also got the write if you load radeon with radeon.no_wb=1 ?
>> I think at this address it's the wb page, or maybe the cp as wb likely
>> take only one page
>
> radeon.no
Hi
The following patch fixes mesa tarball creation again
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fix-tarball-creation.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 446 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20110
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:11:28PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Do you also got the write if you load radeon with radeon.no_wb=1 ?
> I think at this address it's the wb page, or maybe the cp as wb likely
> take only one page
radeon.no_wb=1 makes no difference. The box still reboots.
Joer
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36236
--- Comment #15 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-04-16 07:02:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Interesting, I have this with llvmpipe too, but it looks correct with nvc0, so
> I'd look for a driver specific issue.
This is interesting, would it be p
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36236
--- Comment #15 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-04-16 07:02:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Interesting, I have this with llvmpipe too, but it looks correct with nvc0, so
> I'd look for a driver specific issue.
This is interesting, would it be p
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28847
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[r300c, r300g] Regnum |Regnum Online: shader
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28847
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[r300c, r300g] Regnum |Regnum Online: shader
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Jesse Barnes
wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:10:07 +1000
> Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> > -
>> > +#define DRM_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB444 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1<<0)
>> > +#define DRM_COLOR_FORMAT_YCRCB444 ? ? ?(1<<1)
>> > +#define DRM_COLOR_FORMAT_YCRCB422 ? ? ?(1<<2)
>> > ?/*
>>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36256
--- Comment #1 from Connor Behan 2011-04-16 06:42:01
PDT ---
I can make the consoles work if I delete /dev/vga_arbiter before starting X.
This explains why 2.6.32 was the first kernel where I had this problem. Can you
go back to making vga_arb a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36256
--- Comment #1 from Connor Behan 2011-04-16
06:42:01 PDT ---
I can make the consoles work if I delete /dev/vga_arbiter before starting X.
This explains why 2.6.32 was the first kernel where I had this problem. Can you
go back to making vga_arb a
> -
> +#define DRM_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB444 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(1<<0)
> +#define DRM_COLOR_FORMAT_YCRCB444 ? ? ?(1<<1)
> +#define DRM_COLOR_FORMAT_YCRCB422 ? ? ?(1<<2)
> ?/*
> ?* Describes a given display (e.g. CRT or flat panel) and its limitations.
> ?*/
> @@ -201,6 +203,7 @@ struct drm_display_info {
> ?
* Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:06:41PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Alexandre Demers wrote:
> >
> > > On 11-04-15 10:27 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:16:59AM -0400, Alexandre Demers wrote:
> > > >> Ok, I'll test it today. Should I apply
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:18:02PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 12:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > Joerg, mind submitting it with a changelog that includes everything we
> > learned
> > about this bug and all the Tested-by's in place?
> >
> > Is anyone of the opinion that we sh
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:06:41PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Alexandre Demers wrote:
>
> > On 11-04-15 10:27 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:16:59AM -0400, Alexandre Demers wrote:
> > >> Ok, I'll test it today. Should I apply it on a clean rc3 without any of
> > >>
On 04/14/2011 12:42 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> We've already seen that apps want to monitor the display config, and
> some (like upowerd) poll for changes since we don't provide a
> notification for general mode config changes, just hotplug events. So
> add a new drm event, with CHANGE=1 set in the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
José Fonseca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|DRI |Mesa
Version|unspecified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
Jos? Fonseca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|DRI |Mesa
Version|unspecified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #1 from pell...@gmail.com 2011-04-16 02:35:29 PDT ---
Forgot to mention that tests 3/7 and 4/7 print some Mesa errors when running
with ST_DEUG=fallback,mesa :
test3 :
Mesa: User error: GL_INVALID_OPERATION in glBegin(fragment pro
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #1 from pelloux at gmail.com 2011-04-16 02:35:29 PDT ---
Forgot to mention that tests 3/7 and 4/7 print some Mesa errors when running
with ST_DEUG=fallback,mesa :
test3 :
Mesa: User error: GL_INVALID_OPERATION in glBegin(fragment
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
Summary: Incorrect rendering in SPECviewperf benchmark
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
Summary: Incorrect rendering in SPECviewperf benchmark
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35998
--- Comment #5 from rob...@gmail.com 2011-04-16 01:53:47 PDT ---
Same artifacts here. x1250 (Gallium-Driver) on Samsung R60
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35998
--- Comment #5 from robhae at gmail.com 2011-04-16 01:53:47 PDT ---
Same artifacts here. x1250 (Gallium-Driver) on Samsung R60
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36289
dnm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36289
dnm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36289
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Kaiser 2011-04-16 01:38:50 PDT ---
Looks like bug 34280, which was recently fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36289
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Kaiser 2011-04-16 01:38:50 PDT
---
Looks like bug 34280, which was recently fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
Hi
The following patch fixes mesa tarball creation again
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index be95679..646e152 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ MAIN_FILES = \
$(DIRECTORY)/src/mesa/math/descrip.mms\
$(DIRECTORY)/src/mesa/program/*.[chly]\
$(DIRECTORY)/src/me
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36289
Summary: Text is unreadable/completely mangled.
Product: Mesa
Version: 7.10
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36289
Summary: Text is unreadable/completely mangled.
Product: Mesa
Version: 7.10
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35312
--- Comment #4 from Francis Whittle 2011-04-16 00:08:05
PDT ---
Patch is strictly a work-around and a bloody hack (dripping even). Indicates
there's something should be happening in the driver code that isn't. "Fixes"
was a bad word choice.
A
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35312
--- Comment #4 from Francis Whittle 2011-04-16
00:08:05 PDT ---
Patch is strictly a work-around and a bloody hack (dripping even). Indicates
there's something should be happening in the driver code that isn't. "Fixes"
was a bad word choice.
A
46 matches
Mail list logo
