https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #8 from revcompg...@gmail.com 2011-01-17 23:26:45 PST ---
So, I've been digging around with DDD in the crash, and I've found something
that looks pretty interesting to me. In _ae_ArrayElement(GLint) in
main/api_arrayelt.c the debugger
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #8 from revcompgeek at gmail.com 2011-01-17 23:26:45 PST ---
So, I've been digging around with DDD in the crash, and I've found something
that looks pretty interesting to me. In _ae_ArrayElement(GLint) in
main/api_arrayelt.c the debugg
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26982
Chris Kennedy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|All |i386
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26982
Summary: drm-next/linux-next glxgears CPU usage doubles for
32bit, doesn't on 64bit
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.37-rc7-next-20101228+
Platform: All
OS/
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
--- Comment #4 from Brett Witherspoon 2011-01-17
22:52:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=43922)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=43922)
vbios rom
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
--- Comment #3 from Brett Witherspoon 2011-01-17
22:51:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=43912)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=43912)
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
--- Comment #2 from Brett Witherspoon 2011-01-17
22:51:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=43902)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=43902)
Xorg.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15120
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #7 from revcompg...@gmail.com 2011-01-17 21:36:19 PST ---
Okay, I finally figured out how to attach gdb to java, and after installing the
debug version of glibc and the latest mesa from git, I got this backtrace from
Minecraft:
(gdb)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #7 from revcompgeek at gmail.com 2011-01-17 21:36:19 PST ---
Okay, I finally figured out how to attach gdb to java, and after installing the
debug version of glibc and the latest mesa from git, I got this backtrace from
Minecraft:
(gd
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeucher at gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26552
--- Comment #17 from Alex Deucher 2011-01-17
18:06:49 ---
@Andrea, can you try the mini-patches in comment 10 along with the patch in
comment 8 and report back which if there are any problems with any of them on
your system?
--
Configure b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26552
--- Comment #16 from Alex Deucher 2011-01-17
16:06:19 ---
@Daniel, does the patch from comment 8 also work? How about the patch in
comment 8 plus some one of the mini-patches in comment 10?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.or
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26982
Chris Kennedy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|All |i386
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26982
Summary: drm-next/linux-next glxgears CPU usage doubles for
32bit, doesn't on 64bit
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.37-rc7-next-20101228+
Platform: All
OS/
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
--- Comment #4 from Brett Witherspoon 2011-01-17 22:52:22
---
Created an attachment (id=43922)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=43922)
vbios rom
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
--- Comment #3 from Brett Witherspoon 2011-01-17 22:51:57
---
Created an attachment (id=43912)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=43912)
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
--- Comment #2 from Brett Witherspoon 2011-01-17 22:51:26
---
Created an attachment (id=43902)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=43902)
Xorg.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15120
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
--- Comment #9 from John Mesmon 2011-01-17 14:12:38 PST ---
additionally, note that the game was not run full-screen to generate the crash
in 7.10, meaning the bug's title is slightly inaccurate.
I never fully tested non-full screen in 7.9, but
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
--- Comment #9 from John Mesmon 2011-01-17 14:12:38 PST
---
additionally, note that the game was not run full-screen to generate the crash
in 7.10, meaning the bug's title is slightly inaccurate.
I never fully tested non-full screen in 7.9, but
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
--- Comment #12 from Tormod Volden 2011-01-17
13:57:23 PST ---
While debugging https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4607 I noticed the
back buffer was wrong after sleep/resume while the front buffer was fine (this
with my patch applied).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
--- Comment #12 from Tormod Volden 2011-01-17
13:57:23 PST ---
While debugging https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4607 I noticed the
back buffer was wrong after sleep/resume while the front buffer was fine (this
with my patch applied).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #6 from revcompg...@gmail.com 2011-01-17 13:44:04 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42136)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42136)
glxinfo &> glxinfo.txt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpref
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #6 from revcompgeek at gmail.com 2011-01-17 13:44:04 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=42136)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=42136)
glxinfo &> glxinfo.txt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #5 from revcompg...@gmail.com 2011-01-17 13:43:23 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Classic. What's the difference? And how would I figure out what version?
> >
> glxinfo, unless you're running 32-bit Jav
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #5 from revcompgeek at gmail.com 2011-01-17 13:43:23 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Classic. What's the difference? And how would I figure out what version?
> >
> glxinfo, unless you're running 32-bit
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
Summary: radeon: screen distortion on resume
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.37
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
index 46da514..5968dde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #4 from Henri Verbeet 2011-01-17 12:11:42 PST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Classic. What's the difference? And how would I figure out what version?
>
glxinfo, unless you're running 32-bit Java on 64-bit Linux. You'll probably
want
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #4 from Henri Verbeet 2011-01-17 12:11:42
PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Classic. What's the difference? And how would I figure out what version?
>
glxinfo, unless you're running 32-bit Java on 64-bit Linux. You'll probably
want
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #3 from revcompg...@gmail.com 2011-01-17 12:00:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm not sure if Java could cause it to look like that, but at first sight I'd
> say the driver is simply missing debug symbols. Also, is that classic
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #3 from revcompgeek at gmail.com 2011-01-17 12:00:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm not sure if Java could cause it to look like that, but at first sight I'd
> say the driver is simply missing debug symbols. Also, is that class
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
John Mesmon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41448|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
John Mesmon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41448|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
--- Comment #7 from John Mesmon 2011-01-17 11:39:17 PST ---
I recently updated to Mesa-7.10, and (very painfully) managed to obtain a
backtrace. The painful part was due to the jvm spuriously receiving segfaults
(which it ignores?) every 4 second
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
--- Comment #7 from John Mesmon 2011-01-17 11:39:17 PST
---
I recently updated to Mesa-7.10, and (very painfully) managed to obtain a
backtrace. The painful part was due to the jvm spuriously receiving segfaults
(which it ignores?) every 4 secon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
index 46da514..5968dde 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26552
--- Comment #17 from Alex Deucher 2011-01-17 18:06:49
---
@Andrea, can you try the mini-patches in comment 10 along with the patch in
comment 8 and report back which if there are any problems with any of them on
your system?
--
Configure b
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> >
> > I've tested a bit here, current git with the revert does appear to work
> > fine for me.
>
> So Anca has a 8800GT - is that what you're testing?
I don't have an 8800 in the office
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:10 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Anca Emanuel
> wrote:
> >
> > In 2.6.37-git5 with the revert, the boot screen is changing the resolution.
> > With this version, it don't.
>
> So, can you make a nice report of that - along with 'dmesg'
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33185
--- Comment #2 from Wojciech Ryrych 2011-01-17 09:08:32 PST
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Can you get another backtrace with /usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so having debugging
> symbols?
do you mean I have to install debugging symbols when kWin crashes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33185
--- Comment #2 from Wojciech Ryrych 2011-01-17 09:08:32
PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Can you get another backtrace with /usr/lib/dri/r300_dri.so having debugging
> symbols?
do you mean I have to install debugging symbols when kWin crashes
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15120
--- Comment #21 from Alex Zhavnerchik 2011-01-17
08:58:16 ---
Hi. Looks like it works with 2.6.37
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watchi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26552
--- Comment #16 from Alex Deucher 2011-01-17 16:06:19
---
@Daniel, does the patch from comment 8 also work? How about the patch in
comment 8 plus some one of the mini-patches in comment 10?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.or
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942
Summary: radeon: screen distortion on resume
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.37
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
A bunch of radeon and nouveau fixes. Ben says this should fix any
corruption people are seeing with plymouth splash screens, and the radeon
fixes are scattered around, the main one being not enabling PCIE GEN2 mode
by default, seems like AGP PCIE vendors make crappy chipsets.
Dave.
The follow
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #2 from Henri Verbeet 2011-01-17 03:58:57 PST
---
I'm not sure if Java could cause it to look like that, but at first sight I'd
say the driver is simply missing debug symbols. Also, is that classic r600 or
gallium, and which version?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
--- Comment #2 from Henri Verbeet 2011-01-17 03:58:57
PST ---
I'm not sure if Java could cause it to look like that, but at first sight I'd
say the driver is simply missing debug symbols. Also, is that classic r600 or
gallium, and which version?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
--- Comment #6 from Michel Dänzer 2011-01-17 03:24:33 PST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> $ addr2line -e /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/mesa/r300_dri.so.debug 0x36477
> /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/mesa-7.9-r1/work/Mesa-7.9/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/radeo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32654
--- Comment #6 from Michel D?nzer 2011-01-17 03:24:33
PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> $ addr2line -e /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/mesa/r300_dri.so.debug 0x36477
> /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/mesa-7.9-r1/work/Mesa-7.9/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/radeo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|xorg|Mesa
Component|Driver/Radeon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33175
Michel D?nzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|xorg|Mesa
Component|Driver/Radeon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33185
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|xorg|Mesa
Component|Driver/Radeon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33185
Michel D?nzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|xorg|Mesa
Component|Driver/Radeon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
--- Comment #10 from Richard Mittendorfer 2011-01-17
01:32:03 ---
On .37 now with PM_DEBUG and stuff there. Above method too hangs at quite the
same position (when coming out of suspend after few seconds). Nothing in
syslog, dmesg pm tracing
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15120
--- Comment #21 from Alex Zhavnerchik 2011-01-17
08:58:16 ---
Hi. Looks like it works with 2.6.37
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watchi
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:42:37PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I'll push the attached I think this time.
the point of headers_check is exactly to prevent indirect inclusion.
This is even 1st topic o SubmitChecklist:
" 1: If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
that
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:16:16PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> I truly have those types in use.
I meant you :-p
--
balbi
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:07:32AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:46:22 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Drop the following headers_check errors:
> > /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h:85: found
> > __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
> > /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/i915
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:46:22PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Drop the following headers_check errors:
> /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h:85: found
> __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
> /linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h:120: found
> __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
--- Comment #9 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-01-17 00:22:37 ---
Does the following:
# echo core > /sys/power/pm_test
# echo mem > /sys/power/state
return to the command prompt (after about 5-10 sec) or does it hang too?
--
Configure bugmail
Drop the following headers_check errors:
/linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h:85: found
__[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
/linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h:120: found
__[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
/linux-2.6/usr/include/drm/mga_drm.h:260: found
__[us]{8,16,32,64} type witho
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
--- Comment #8 from Richard Mittendorfer 2011-01-17
00:06:05 ---
Thanks for looking into this. It's the same behavior w/ and w/o Xorg. At the
STR
process the backlight goes off shortly but remains lit during suspend. The
screen
goes black an
65 matches
Mail list logo
