https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
--- Comment #3 from Chris 2010-12-17 23:24:29 PST ---
That patch makes yours go a bit further than my backtrace did, I had patched my
gentoo ebuild similar to what that patch does by skipping the NULL buffer at
the first point. It did the same t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
--- Comment #3 from Chris 2010-12-17 23:24:29 PST ---
That patch makes yours go a bit further than my backtrace did, I had patched my
gentoo ebuild similar to what that patch does by skipping the NULL buffer at
the first point. It did the same t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13170
--- Comment #58 from David 2010-12-17 18:03:45 ---
New comment downstream saying:
"I've got Ubuntu 10.10 (2.6.35-23-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP) booting using
my old grub 1.97 (that was booting Ubuntu 9.04) compiled as so:
./configure --with-pla
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32350
--- Comment #27 from Edgar Villanueva 2010-12-17
17:59:05 PST ---
Did the following test to see if it was a DRI or driver problem.
startup runlevel 1. No X.
pm-suspend
resume.
Screen goes crazy.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32350
--- Comment #27 from Edgar Villanueva 2010-12-17
17:59:05 PST ---
Did the following test to see if it was a DRI or driver problem.
startup runlevel 1. No X.
pm-suspend
resume.
Screen goes crazy.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.
2010/12/17 Alex Deucher :
> Users with TVs or monitors that don't overscan by default would prefer
> to not have underscan enabled, while users with overscanning TVs prefer
> underscan. ?This should hopefully make everyone happy as most monitors
> with audio tend to be TVs which overscan by default
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
--- Comment #2 from Øyvind Sæther 2010-12-17 17:28:35 PST
---
* Gentoo,
* kernel 2.6.37-rc5-git6,
* compiled using CFLAGS="-g3 -O0",
* FEATURES="nostrip",
* added --enable-debug to mesa-.ebuild,
* added https://bugs.freedesktop.org/atta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
--- Comment #2 from ?yvind S?ther 2010-12-17 17:28:35
PST ---
* Gentoo,
* kernel 2.6.37-rc5-git6,
* compiled using CFLAGS="-g3 -O0",
* FEATURES="nostrip",
* added --enable-debug to mesa-.ebuild,
* added https://bugs.freedesktop.org/atta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oyvi...@everdot.org
--- Comment #1 from A
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oyvinds at everdot.org
--- Comment #1 fro
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #4 from Chris 2010-12-17 14:56:15 PST ---
I have this same issue, my bug report for it is here...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
I have a full backtrace of the issue with a mesa debug compile
--
Configure bugma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #4 from Chris 2010-12-17 14:56:15 PST ---
I have this same issue, my bug report for it is here...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32455
I have a full backtrace of the issue with a mesa debug compile
--
Configure bugma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #3 from Jerome Glisse 2010-12-17 14:27:24
PST ---
please do the following :
make clean
CFLAGS="-g3 -O0" ./autogen.sh --enable-debug --enable-gallium-r600
make -j3
And recapture the backtrace with this debug version. Use btfull and a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #3 from Jerome Glisse 2010-12-17
14:27:24 PST ---
please do the following :
make clean
CFLAGS="-g3 -O0" ./autogen.sh --enable-debug --enable-gallium-r600
make -j3
And recapture the backtrace with this debug version. Use btfull and a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #11 from Álmos 2010-12-17 14:15:16 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > I wonder why the skybox renders correctly only on r5xx...
> >
> > Maybe you set world detail=low, whic
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #11 from ?lmos 2010-12-17 14:15:16 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > I wonder why the skybox renders correctly only on r5xx...
> >
> > Maybe you set world detail=low, whic
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #2 from Øyvind Sæther 2010-12-17 13:34:04 PST
---
I applied patch 41220 and got the same SIGSEGV and backtrace. It did not help,
but thank you for trying.
It's possible to run sdlmame games using r600g by turning vertex buffers off,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #2 from ?yvind S?ther 2010-12-17 13:34:04
PST ---
I applied patch 41220 and got the same SIGSEGV and backtrace. It did not help,
but thank you for trying.
It's possible to run sdlmame games using r600g by turning vertex buffers off,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #10 from Marek Olšák 2010-12-17 13:31:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I wonder why the skybox renders correctly only on r5xx...
>
> Maybe you set world detail=low, which removes the clouds (and the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #10 from Marek Ol??k 2010-12-17 13:31:22 PST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I wonder why the skybox renders correctly only on r5xx...
>
> Maybe you set world detail=low, which removes the clouds (and the
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:37:03PM +, ext Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:30:11 +0100, Domenico Andreoli
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:10:28PM -0800, ext Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > Go forth and test. And please do remember to ping bugzilla (or
> > >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #9 from Álmos 2010-12-17 13:21:36 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I wonder why the skybox renders correctly only on r5xx...
Maybe you set world detail=low, which removes the clouds (and the visible
skybox)...
>
> >
> > BTW I fo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #9 from ?lmos 2010-12-17 13:21:36 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I wonder why the skybox renders correctly only on r5xx...
Maybe you set world detail=low, which removes the clouds (and the visible
skybox)...
>
> >
> > BTW I fo
On 12/17/2010 12:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> * When I talk about a bus, I mean 'struct bus_type', which identifies
>>> all devices with a uniform bus interface to their parent device
>>> (think: PCI, USB, I2C). You seem to think of a bus as a specific
>>> instance of that bus type,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32449
--- Comment #1 from Jerome Glisse 2010-12-17 12:28:48
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=41221)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=41221
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=32449&attachment=41221
avoid segfault
D
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32449
--- Comment #1 from Jerome Glisse 2010-12-17
12:28:48 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=41221)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=41221
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=32449&attachment=41221
avoid segfault
D
On Thursday 16 December 2010 19:26:37 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 12:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > [note: please configure your email client properly so it keeps
> > proper attribution of text and and does not rewrap the citations
> > incorrectly. Wrap your own text after 70 character
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #1 from Jerome Glisse 2010-12-17 11:36:12
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=41220)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=41220
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=32456&attachment=41220
avoid segfault
C
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32456
--- Comment #1 from Jerome Glisse 2010-12-17
11:36:12 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=41220)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=41220
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=32456&attachment=41220
avoid segfault
C
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #8 from Marek Olšák 2010-12-17 11:32:44 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> You were a bit hasty (less than 4 hours between the question and the bug
> close?). Here it still looks exactly like on the attached screenshot. I also
> check
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #8 from Marek Ol??k 2010-12-17 11:32:44 PST
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> You were a bit hasty (less than 4 hours between the question and the bug
> close?). Here it still looks exactly like on the attached screenshot. I also
> chec
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
Álmos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
?lmos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
Users with TVs or monitors that don't overscan by default would prefer
to not have underscan enabled, while users with overscanning TVs prefer
underscan. This should hopefully make everyone happy as most monitors
with audio tend to be TVs which overscan by default and monitors without
audio don't
This avoids some issues in the current hdmi audio code for monitors
without audio.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/ra
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13170
--- Comment #58 from David 2010-12-17 18:03:45 ---
New comment downstream saying:
"I've got Ubuntu 10.10 (2.6.35-23-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP) booting using
my old grub 1.97 (that was booting Ubuntu 9.04) compiled as so:
./configure --with-pla
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:02 AM, David Sin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:43:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, both DMM and GEM at a high level manage objects
>> in video memory. The IOMMU that you have on the Omap hardware seems
>> to resemble the GART that sits betwe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27438
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2010-12-17 08:46:59 PST ---
this is possibly a duplicate of bug 32066.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27438
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2010-12-17 08:46:59 PST
---
this is possibly a duplicate of bug 32066.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27744
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
2010/12/17 Alex Deucher :
> Users with TVs or monitors that don't overscan by default would prefer
> to not have underscan enabled, while users with overscanning TVs prefer
> underscan. This should hopefully make everyone happy as most monitors
> with audio tend to be TVs which overscan by default
Users with TVs or monitors that don't overscan by default would prefer
to not have underscan enabled, while users with overscanning TVs prefer
underscan. This should hopefully make everyone happy as most monitors
with audio tend to be TVs which overscan by default and monitors without
audio don't
This avoids some issues in the current hdmi audio code for monitors
without audio.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_encoders.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/ra
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #5 from Marek Olšák 2010-12-17 05:50:14 PST ---
The skybox looks fine here, absolutely seamless.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28994
--- Comment #5 from Marek Ol??k 2010-12-17 05:50:14 PST
---
The skybox looks fine here, absolutely seamless.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30166
--- Comment #6 from Marek Olšák 2010-12-17 05:20:40 PST ---
It seems to work very well without the Glare effect here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30166
--- Comment #6 from Marek Ol??k 2010-12-17 05:20:40 PST
---
It seems to work very well without the Glare effect here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30131
--- Comment #5 from Marek Olšák 2010-12-17 04:56:40 PST ---
Martin, is this still an issue with current Mesa git and latest wine?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30167
--- Comment #18 from Pavel Ondračka 2010-12-17 04:56:31 PST
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Is this still an issue with current Mesa master?
Yes, this is still an issue with the latest Mesa master.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedeskt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30131
--- Comment #5 from Marek Ol??k 2010-12-17 04:56:40 PST
---
Martin, is this still an issue with current Mesa git and latest wine?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30167
--- Comment #18 from Pavel Ondra?ka 2010-12-17 04:56:31
PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Is this still an issue with current Mesa master?
Yes, this is still an issue with the latest Mesa master.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedeskt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28623
--- Comment #10 from Álmos 2010-12-17 04:42:43 PST ---
Yes, and it currently makes the game completely unplayable.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28623
--- Comment #10 from ?lmos 2010-12-17 04:42:43 PST ---
Yes, and it currently makes the game completely unplayable.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30167
--- Comment #17 from Marek Olšák 2010-12-17 04:35:51 PST ---
Is this still an issue with current Mesa master?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30167
--- Comment #17 from Marek Ol??k 2010-12-17 04:35:51 PST
---
Is this still an issue with current Mesa master?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28623
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[r300g] enemy territory:|[r300g] ETQW: Invalid index
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28623
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[r300g] enemy territory:|[r300g] ETQW: Invalid index
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30007
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxi...@free.fr
--- Comment #37 from Marek
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29400
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29400
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30007
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxijac at free.fr
--- Comment #37 from Ma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30152
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30152
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:37:03PM +, ext Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:30:11 +0100, Domenico Andreoli
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:10:28PM -0800, ext Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > Go forth and test. And please do remember to ping bugzilla (or
> > >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28800
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28800
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 12/17/2010 12:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
* When I talk about a bus, I mean 'struct bus_type', which identifies
all devices with a uniform bus interface to their parent device
(think: PCI, USB, I2C). You seem to think of a bus as a specific
instance of that bus type, i.e. the devic
On Thursday 16 December 2010 19:26:37 Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 12:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > [note: please configure your email client properly so it keeps
> > proper attribution of text and and does not rewrap the citations
> > incorrectly. Wrap your own text after 70 character
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28800
--- Comment #25 from Álmos 2010-12-17 03:07:50 PST ---
The 'possible fix' patch fixes everything, and is far superior to my attempts
(somehow I thought that if is important). Please commit it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28800
--- Comment #25 from ?lmos 2010-12-17 03:07:50 PST ---
The 'possible fix' patch fixes everything, and is far superior to my attempts
(somehow I thought that if is important). Please commit it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22472
--- Comment #13 from Florian Mickler 2010-12-17
01:17:14 ---
Did you find anything useful?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24382
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24382
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24462
Florian Mickler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28800
--- Comment #24 from Marek Olšák 2010-12-17 00:11:49 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=41199)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=41199
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28800&attachment=41199
possible fix
(In r
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28800
--- Comment #24 from Marek Ol??k 2010-12-17 00:11:49 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=41199)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=41199
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28800&attachment=41199
possible fix
(In
81 matches
Mail list logo
