https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31499
--- Comment #2 from Tom Stellard 2010-11-18 23:45:16 PST
---
It looks like some of the KDE devs have identified the failing shader as the
Lanczos filter. It would be helpful if you could attach the Lanczos filter
GLSL code along with the stderr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31499
--- Comment #2 from Tom Stellard 2010-11-18 23:45:16
PST ---
It looks like some of the KDE devs have identified the failing shader as the
Lanczos filter. It would be helpful if you could attach the Lanczos filter
GLSL code along with the stderr
On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
> 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking
> team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36,
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any other unresolved
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:37:18 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> As per advice from Jean Delvare.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
> Cc: Jean Delvare
Thanks Alex.
Acked-by: Jean Delvare
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |9 ++---
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hi Linus,
Just a fixes tree for -rc3 if possible, it did get rebased recently as I
had to get the nouveau pull cleaned, but I'd been running the non-nouveau
bits for a few days, there is also one late regression fix from Alex and
some fixups after Jean pushed an i2c change that broke the kms d
From: Alex Deucher
These got lost in the last i2c cleanup. Fixes:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23222
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
--- Comment #5 from Alex Schuster 2010-11-18 16:42:16 PST
---
Okay, so it is not active:"OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RS780 9610)
20090101 TCL". No gallium in there.
Do I have to activate it? Or is it a matter of compile options? I h
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
--- Comment #5 from Alex Schuster 2010-11-18 16:42:16
PST ---
Okay, so it is not active:"OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RS780 9610)
20090101 TCL". No gallium in there.
Do I have to activate it? Or is it a matter of compile options? I h
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> Subject : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> Submitter : Nikola Ciprich
> Date : 2010-10-15 7:10 (35 days old)
> Message-ID : <2
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
> Subject ? ? ? ? : 2.6.36-rc7-git2 - panic/GPF: e1000e/vlans?
> Submitter ? ? ? : Nikola Ciprich
> Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-10-15 7:10 (35 days old)
> Message-ID ? ? ?: <2
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us kno
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36,
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
>
> If you know of any other unresolved
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> Just for info, UDF BKL removal patches seem to work fine but I want to
> give them some final SMP testing on Monday before pushing them to -next.
> I'm not sure how much people hurry with disabling the lock so if I should
> push them ASAP or wh
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.36,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.36, please let us
know either and we'll add th
Hi,
On Wed 17-11-10 16:26:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It seems the v4l and udf code has been worked out now and patches
> to kill the BKL there are finally making it upstream.
>
> As promised, here are the patches I did since the kernel summit
> to turn off the BKL by default. Given that -rc2 is
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> ?Just for info, UDF BKL removal patches seem to work fine but I want to
> give them some final SMP testing on Monday before pushing them to -next.
> I'm not sure how much people hurry with disabling the lock so if I should
> push them ASAP or wh
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
--- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-18 15:37:08 PST ---
check the renderer string in glxinfo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assign
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
--- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-18 15:37:08 PST
---
check the renderer string in glxinfo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assig
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
--- Comment #3 from Alex Schuster 2010-11-18 15:11:25 PST
---
Okay. I did not ever hera about this gallium stuff, but I see Gentoo has
support for it, when I upgrade to mesa-8.9. So I did. Um, how can I see that
gallium is really active? I do no
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
--- Comment #3 from Alex Schuster 2010-11-18 15:11:25
PST ---
Okay. I did not ever hera about this gallium stuff, but I see Gentoo has
support for it, when I upgrade to mesa-8.9. So I did. Um, how can I see that
gallium is really active? I do no
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29867
Michal Suchanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29867
Michal Suchanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hi,
I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little
confusing. For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n?
Maybe it would be a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for
each each repository. Currently they all report "Unnamed repository;
edit this file to n
From: Alex Deucher
These got lost in the last i2c cleanup. Fixes:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23222
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_combios.c | 13 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi Alex,
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:56:49 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> This causes the connector to not be added since i2c init fails
> for the adapter. Fixes:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31688
Good catch. It may seem to be a little harsh but I'm glad I added the
check to i2c-core
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31482
Maximiliano Castañón changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31482
Maximiliano Casta??n changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
From: Jerome Glisse
Forbid allocating buffer bigger than VRAM or GTT, also properly set
lpfn field of placement if VRAM is too small.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h|2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 19 ++-
drivers/gp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18 11:42:10
PST ---
Thank you, the patch fixes the issue for me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18
11:42:10 PST ---
Thank you, the patch fixes the issue for me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
As per advice from Jean Delvare.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: Jean Delvare
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c
index d263bd1..ded2a4
From: Jerome Glisse
Forbid allocating buffer bigger than VRAM or GTT, also properly set
lpfn field of placement if VRAM is too small.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h|2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 19 ++-
drivers/gp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #4 from Jerome Glisse 2010-11-18 10:51:59
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=40397)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=40397
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=31708&attachment=40397
Forbid big bo all
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #4 from Jerome Glisse 2010-11-18
10:51:59 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=40397)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=40397
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=31708&attachment=40397
Forbid big bo all
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Hellström 2010-11-18
10:38:04 PST ---
This looks like a radeon driver bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Hellstr?m 2010-11-18
10:38:04 PST ---
This looks like a radeon driver bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31667
--- Comment #7 from Török Edwin 2010-11-18 10:28:10 PST
---
The missing character is a similar symptom to that of this bug for r300g which
got fixed:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
Do you need the RADEON_DEBUG=vp logs (or som
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31667
--- Comment #7 from T?r?k Edwin 2010-11-18 10:28:10
PST ---
The missing character is a similar symptom to that of this bug for r300g which
got fixed:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28517
Do you need the RADEON_DEBUG=vp logs (or som
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|xorg|Mesa
Component|Driver/Radeon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31732
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|xorg|Mesa
Component|Driver/Radeon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29340
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29340
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738
--- Comment #24 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-18 10:13:34 PST ---
This should be fixed in 2.6.36.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee f
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29738
--- Comment #24 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-18 10:13:34 PST
---
This should be fixed in 2.6.36.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30049
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30049
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31400
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31400
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
2010/11/18 Marius Gr?ger :
> Hi,
>
> I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little confusing.
> For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n? Maybe it would be
> a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for each each repository.
> Currently they all report "Unnam
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:37:18 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> As per advice from Jean Delvare.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
> Cc: Jean Delvare
Thanks Alex.
Acked-by: Jean Delvare
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |9 ++---
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
As per advice from Jean Delvare.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: Jean Delvare
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c
index d263bd1..ded2a4
2010/11/18 Marius Gröger :
> Hi,
>
> I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little confusing.
> For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n? Maybe it would be
> a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for each each repository.
> Currently they all report "Unnam
Hi,
I find the various git repositories for drm sometimes a little
confusing. For example, what is the difference between d-n and d-c-n?
Maybe it would be a good idea to fill out the gitweb information for
each each repository. Currently they all report "Unnamed repository;
edit this file to
Hi Alex,
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:56:49 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> This causes the connector to not be added since i2c init fails
> for the adapter. Fixes:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31688
Good catch. It may seem to be a little harsh but I'm glad I added the
check to i2c-core
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18 05:07:36
PST ---
I applied the following patch to the kernel; with it firefox loads and displays
the image.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 3ca77dc..e678
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18
05:07:36 PST ---
I applied the following patch to the kernel; with it firefox loads and displays
the image.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 3ca77dc..e678
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18 04:47:29
PST ---
When the BUG() in ttm_bo.c:1123 triggers, the values are as follows:
bo->mem.num_pages = 16984, placement->lpfn =16384, placement->fpfn = 0
Hope that helps a bit.
--
Configure bugm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss 2010-11-18
04:47:29 PST ---
When the BUG() in ttm_bo.c:1123 triggers, the values are as follows:
bo->mem.num_pages = 16984, placement->lpfn =16384, placement->fpfn = 0
Hope that helps a bit.
--
Configure bugm
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
--- Comment #11 from Andy Furniss 2010-11-18
04:43:04 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Good news, r600g doesn't have this bug!
> Just tested mesa git c48ae0b6eddc71831ea0ea480a0177523ae6ee76, and shadowtex
> looked fine.
This has regressed wi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
--- Comment #11 from Andy Furniss 2010-11-18
04:43:04 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Good news, r600g doesn't have this bug!
> Just tested mesa git c48ae0b6eddc71831ea0ea480a0177523ae6ee76, and shadowtex
> looked fine.
This has regressed wi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31578
Andy Furniss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31578
Andy Furniss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
Summary: kernel oops when loading large images with firefox
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31708
Summary: kernel oops when loading large images with firefox
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31667
--- Comment #6 from Török Edwin 2010-11-18 03:04:04 PST
---
On mesa commit 185d862cd8cd0a56dd86daa01d9c692ff4abfb54 right now, and the
horizontal black lines problem is fixed on r600g, the transparent character
problem stays though.
--
Configu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31667
--- Comment #6 from T?r?k Edwin 2010-11-18 03:04:04
PST ---
On mesa commit 185d862cd8cd0a56dd86daa01d9c692ff4abfb54 right now, and the
horizontal black lines problem is fixed on r600g, the transparent character
problem stays though.
--
Configu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31578
--- Comment #3 from Tilman Sauerbeck 2010-11-18
00:06:55 PST ---
Retry with the tip of the master branch (and throw away the patch I posted).
Commit a23f25eba1fb8919a29efb88ef9e351abcc65b2e should fix this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31578
--- Comment #3 from Tilman Sauerbeck 2010-11-18
00:06:55 PST ---
Retry with the tip of the master branch (and throw away the patch I posted).
Commit a23f25eba1fb8919a29efb88ef9e351abcc65b2e should fix this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.
71 matches
Mail list logo