https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30351
--- Comment #6 from Tom Stellard 2010-11-06 22:14:57 PDT
---
I took a look at this game, and I can't tell what the problem is. Can you post
screenshots of the current behavior and the expected behavior?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.free
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30351
--- Comment #6 from Tom Stellard 2010-11-06 22:14:57
PDT ---
I took a look at this game, and I can't tell what the problem is. Can you post
screenshots of the current behavior and the expected behavior?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.free
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30007
--- Comment #34 from davide 2010-11-06 19:29:24 PDT ---
Just to keep the bug up to date..
I got a new laptop with an integrated intel graphics card (core i5, using i965
classic driver) and the blur effect is broken exactly as it was with r300g
(b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30007
--- Comment #34 from davide 2010-11-06 19:29:24 PDT
---
Just to keep the bug up to date..
I got a new laptop with an integrated intel graphics card (core i5, using i965
classic driver) and the blur effect is broken exactly as it was with r300g
(
Structure drm_vmw_fence_rep is copied to userland with field "pad64"
uninitialized. It leads to leaking of contents of kernel stack memory.
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov
---
Compile tested.
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
di
On 2010-11-02 08:20, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 16:09 +0100, Prof. Dr. Klaus Kusche wrote:
>> On my Dell Precision M6500, backlight power switching does not work,
>> neither by using bl_power in /sys/backlight/...
>
> Please provide the full path of the file you're using.
>
>> nor
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31246
--- Comment #2 from Kjell Rune Skaaraas
2010-11-06 12:44:17 PDT ---
To put it this way, I found the patches you referred to but they don't tell me
much. I did dig through the piglet code and found the definition of the test
though, it's in a bit
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31246
--- Comment #2 from Kjell Rune Skaaraas
2010-11-06 12:44:17 PDT ---
To put it this way, I found the patches you referred to but they don't tell me
much. I did dig through the piglet code and found the definition of the test
though, it's in a bit
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Richard G. 2010-11-06 11:17:39
PDT ---
> I think either this should be commited or instead it should be handled
> by the driver and the DD_POINT_SIZE flag completely removed as it's
> currently just broken. Since the pl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Richard G. 2010-11-06
11:17:39 PDT ---
> I think either this should be commited or instead it should be handled
> by the driver and the DD_POINT_SIZE flag completely removed as it's
> currently just broken. Since the pl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702
Roland Scheidegger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bri...@vmware.com
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702
Roland Scheidegger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brianp at vmware.com
--- Comment #11
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Richard G. 2010-11-06 00:01:19
PDT ---
Hi Roland, I see you've been here before!
I no longer have the Ubuntu Maverick install I was testing with earlier (I
don't have the disk it was on anymore), but I do have here an
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Richard G. 2010-11-06
00:01:19 PDT ---
Hi Roland, I see you've been here before!
I no longer have the Ubuntu Maverick install I was testing with earlier (I
don't have the disk it was on anymore), but I do have here an
14 matches
Mail list logo
