Hi chaps,
On 9 August 2010 14:41, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On 8 August 2010 17:36, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> On 5 August 2010 16:23, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jerome Glisse
>>> wrote:
On 08/05/2010 06:52 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>
> After around
From: Ben Skeggs
Nouveau will need this on GeForce 8 and up to account for the GPU
reordering physical VRAM for some memory types.
v2: rebase to include nvc0_instmem.c changes
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 12 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28966
--- Comment #1 from Marek Olšák 2010-08-17 19:34:13 PDT ---
Could you test the demo with current mesa git?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28966
--- Comment #1 from Marek Ol??k 2010-08-17 19:34:13 PDT
---
Could you test the demo with current mesa git?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29013
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29013
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29437
Marek Olšák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29437
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Daniel J Blueman
wrote:
> Hi chaps,
>
> On 9 August 2010 14:41, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> On 8 August 2010 17:36, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>>> On 5 August 2010 16:23, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jerome Glisse
wrote:
> On 0
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Jon Sturm wrote:
>
>> ut2004 has been having issues for a while so I wouldn't blame this
>> patch 100%, Then again my issues seem to be similar to
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27443 which may or may
>> not be related.
>
> On
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Daniel J Blueman
wrote:
> Hi chaps,
>
> On 9 August 2010 14:41, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> On 8 August 2010 17:36, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>>> On 5 August 2010 16:23, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jerome Glisse
wrote:
> On 0
Hi chaps,
On 9 August 2010 14:41, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On 8 August 2010 17:36, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> On 5 August 2010 16:23, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jerome Glisse
>>> wrote:
On 08/05/2010 06:52 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>
> After around
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Jon Sturm wrote:
>
>> ut2004 has been having issues for a while so I wouldn't blame this
>> patch 100%, Then again my issues seem to be similar to
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27443 which may or may
>> not be related.
>
> On
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #16 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 14:09:48 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> the bug is hard to trigger (10 min scrolling with firefox), so bisecting will
> take a lot of time. I booted with no_wb=1 just for testing and now it seems
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #16 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 14:09:48 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> the bug is hard to trigger (10 min scrolling with firefox), so bisecting will
> take a lot of time. I booted with no_wb=1 just for testing and now it seems
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #15 from Marc 2010-08-17 14:05:34 PDT ---
the bug is hard to trigger (10 min scrolling with firefox), so bisecting will
take a lot of time. I booted with no_wb=1 just for testing and now it seems to
work fine. So maybe the blit and th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #15 from Marc 2010-08-17 14:05:34 PDT ---
the bug is hard to trigger (10 min scrolling with firefox), so bisecting will
take a lot of time. I booted with no_wb=1 just for testing and now it seems to
work fine. So maybe the blit and th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #6 from Frederic Crozat 2010-08-17 12:51:52 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=37925)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37925)
kernel message log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?ta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #6 from Frederic Crozat 2010-08-17 12:51:52
PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=37925)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=37925)
kernel message log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?ta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #14 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 12:38:46 PDT ---
Can you bisect to see what commit is causing the problem?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #14 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 12:38:46 PDT
---
Can you bisect to see what commit is causing the problem?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 12:36:50 PDT ---
Can you attach your dmesg when that happens?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #5 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 12:36:50 PDT
---
Can you attach your dmesg when that happens?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #4 from Frederic Crozat 2010-08-17 12:18:00 PDT
---
hmm, trying mesa git with kms is even worse ATM : gnome-shell (2.29.1) doesn't
respond to anything and does refresh correctly ; kernel states :
drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -12. Kernel faile
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #4 from Frederic Crozat 2010-08-17 12:18:00
PDT ---
hmm, trying mesa git with kms is even worse ATM : gnome-shell (2.29.1) doesn't
respond to anything and does refresh correctly ; kernel states :
drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -12. Kernel faile
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #13 from Marc 2010-08-17 12:14:24 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> yes it does
eh - is!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #13 from Marc 2010-08-17 12:14:24 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> yes it does
eh - is!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
Marc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marvi...@gmx.de
--- Comment #12 from Marc 2010-0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
Marc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marvin24 at gmx.de
--- Comment #12 from Marc 201
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:15:18PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:22:35 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Do we currently have a method of profiling DRI/DRM drivers?
> >
> > I was thinking that it would be interesting to:
> >
> > 1) Execute a benchmark, or som
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26999
prl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prl-bugs.freedesktop@qu
|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26999
prl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prl-bugs.freedesktop.org at qu
|
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 21:23 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> When I ran "make headers_check" on upstream I got following
> set of warnings for the drm headers:
>
> usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h:85: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
>
> usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h:120: found __[us]{8,16,32,6
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 07:53:51 PDT ---
Ideally you'd use mesa git and kms as that enables additional hw-accelerated GL
functionality (readpixels, etc.) that should improve gnome-shell performance.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 07:53:51 PDT
---
Ideally you'd use mesa git and kms as that enables additional hw-accelerated GL
functionality (readpixels, etc.) that should improve gnome-shell performance.
--
Configure bugmail: ht
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 07:44:50 PDT ---
is this still a problem with the current d-r-t?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher 2010-08-17 07:44:50 PDT
---
is this still a problem with the current d-r-t?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:54 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On 08/16/2010 09:22 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Jerome Glisse
> > wrote:
> >> On 08/13/2010 12:48 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >>> Initialize nsamples to 1 in case userspace does not emit
> >>> PA_SC_AA_CONFIG
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26999
--- Comment #6 from Julien Viard de Galbert
2010-08-17 04:13:57 PDT ---
Well I don't think 'make clean' will rewrite the code, also I did build it by
rebuilding the debian package, and generally this starts by a 'make clean'.
Note that I did re
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26999
--- Comment #6 from Julien Viard de Galbert
2010-08-17 04:13:57 PDT ---
Well I don't think 'make clean' will rewrite the code, also I did build it by
rebuilding the debian package, and generally this starts by a 'make clean'.
Note that I did re
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #10 from Marc 2010-08-17 01:39:36 PDT ---
well that's what I did. basicly, the patch in comment #2 is an interdiff of
blit_V1 and blit_V2, so I should produce the same result as unapplying V1 and
applying V2 - correct?
output of inte
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29556
--- Comment #10 from Marc 2010-08-17 01:39:36 PDT ---
well that's what I did. basicly, the patch in comment #2 is an interdiff of
blit_V1 and blit_V2, so I should produce the same result as unapplying V1 and
applying V2 - correct?
output of inte
Looks like this got copied from the ddx wrong.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_legacy_crtc.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_legacy_crtc.c
b
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:15:18PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:22:35 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Do we currently have a method of profiling DRI/DRM drivers?
> >
> > I was thinking that it would be interesting to:
> >
> > 1) Execute a benchmark, or som
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #2 from Frederic Crozat 2010-08-17 00:09:00 PDT
---
I've done more tests (with gnome-shell 2.29.1 + clutter 1.2.8):
-with Mesa 7.8.2 and KMS disabled, I don't see any pixmap corruption (but
gnome-shell become very slow)
-with Mesa gi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29580
--- Comment #2 from Frederic Crozat 2010-08-17 00:09:00
PDT ---
I've done more tests (with gnome-shell 2.29.1 + clutter 1.2.8):
-with Mesa 7.8.2 and KMS disabled, I don't see any pixmap corruption (but
gnome-shell become very slow)
-with Mesa gi
46 matches
Mail list logo