Hi,
On 06/29/2012 05:34 AM, Lyre wrote:
> build DRBDs (protocol A)
why is that? :-) Have you tried C?
The fact that your secondary has inconsistent data after you kill the
primary while it's writing is less than surprising considering that
you're using the most loss-prone replication link that D
So I was not able to solve the problem in our current mixed setup with
8.3.11 and 8.4.1. Thus I reverted back to 8.3.11 and will wait for 8.4.2
to come out :-)
On 06/25/2012 12:12 PM, Joschi Brauchle wrote:
I did some more tests and ran all commands manually, that are normally
done by the init
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:52:16AM +0200, Felix Frank wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/29/2012 05:34 AM, Lyre wrote:
> > build DRBDs (protocol A)
>
> why is that? :-) Have you tried C?
>
> The fact that your secondary has inconsistent data after you kill the
That is incorrect.
Just because you do "async
Hi Folks,
I am builing KVM with DRBD storage based on Linbit's documentation. I
created DRBD and it seems works well.
However I added all to a cluster (Pacemaker/Corosync), and I got error
during start:
crm_mon:
Online: [ ss1 ss2 ]
Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd_iscsivg01 [res_drbd_iscsivg01]
On 06/29/2012 11:09 AM, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote:
Jun 29 12:34:53 ss2 LVM[2386]: INFO: 0 logical volume(s) in volume
group "storage" now active
Looks like your problem is right there. The LVM RA considers starting
the VG as failed if the VG doesn't contain any LVs.
