Re: [DRBD-user] Linstor: confining failure domains to a single back-end device

2022-08-23 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Roland Kammerer writes: >> > Do I understand correctly that it means, on each server: >> > >> > 1 disk == 1 PV == 1 VG == 1 ThinPool == 1 storage-pool >> > >> > ? >> >> Ok, so I don't understand how to create and use this setup. Does someone >> have any hints? > > I'd say your assumption is

Re: [DRBD-user] Linstor: confining failure domains to a single back-end device

2022-07-06 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 02:18:17PM +0200, Daniel Dehennin wrote: > Daniel Dehennin > writes: > > Hello > > > In the documentation, there is a mention on “confining failure domains > > to a single back-end device”[1] but I didn't found example of how to do > > so. > > > > Do I understand correctl

Re: [DRBD-user] Linstor: confining failure domains to a single back-end device

2022-07-06 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Daniel Dehennin writes: Hello > In the documentation, there is a mention on “confining failure domains > to a single back-end device”[1] but I didn't found example of how to do > so. > > Do I understand correctly that it means, on each server: > > 1 disk == 1 PV == 1 VG == 1 ThinPool == 1 s