W dniu 19.06.2018 o 11:34, Lars Ellenberg pisze:
And you cannot be bothered to report "such crashes"
in a way that makes it possible to understand and fix those?
"random system crash" is not good enough :-/
Yep, i know it is not enough to find a reason of this crashes, and that why
i don't re
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 09:19:04AM +0200, Artur Kaszuba wrote:
> Hi Lars, thx for answer
>
> W dniu 18.06.2018 o 17:10, Lars Ellenberg pisze:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:03:53PM +0200, Artur Kaszuba wrote:
> > > I know about 3 node solution and i have used it for some time (from
> > > ~9.0.8),
Hi Lars, thx for answer
W dniu 18.06.2018 o 17:10, Lars Ellenberg pisze:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:03:53PM +0200, Artur Kaszuba wrote:
I know about 3 node solution and i have used it for some time (from ~9.0.8),
but i had problems with stability and decided to change configuration to
stacked c
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:03:53PM +0200, Artur Kaszuba wrote:
> I know about 3 node solution and i have used it for some time (from ~9.0.8),
> but i had problems with stability and decided to change configuration to
> stacked configuration, with hope it will work more stable. As a last
> solution
W dniu 13.06.2018 o 11:58, Robert Altnoeder pisze:
On 06/12/2018 10:18 AM, Artur Kaszuba wrote:
Im trying to create stacked device with drbd9
The idea behind DRBD 9.x is that you don't need a stacked device,
instead you can just connect all 3 nodes directly:
resource system-test
{
}
Hi R
On 06/12/2018 10:18 AM, Artur Kaszuba wrote:
> Im trying to create stacked device with drbd9
The idea behind DRBD 9.x is that you don't need a stacked device,
instead you can just connect all 3 nodes directly:
resource system-test
{
net
{
cram-hmac-alg sha256;
shared-sec
Hi
Im trying to create stacked device with drbd9, but im afraid it could be
not possible with current drbd-utils or drbd module, IMO it not support
correctly stacked devices.
Its also possible that i dont understand how it should be configured or
how it work :)
Please take a look on my probl