On Thursday 23 December 2010 22:18:32 Tim Mauerbach wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 09:51 PM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> >>> I'd definitely go with 1, and it has nothing to do with performance.
> >>> If
> >>>
> >>> > > you put the whole VM on top of DRBD, and then make that a
> >>> > > primary/primary (ak
On 12/23/2010 09:51 PM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'd definitely go with 1, and it has nothing to do with performance. If
> > you put the whole VM on top of DRBD, and then make that a primary/primary
> > (aka active/active) DRBD then you can live-migrate the VM between host
> > and/or use Remus
On Thursday 23 December 2010 21:24:07 Tim Mauerbach wrote:
> 2010/12/23 J. Ryan Earl
>
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Tim Mauerbach <
> >
> > tim.mauerb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> I am thinking about the structure of a new mailserver on top of
> >> raid1/lvm/xen.
> >>
> >> Two differ
2010/12/23 J. Ryan Earl
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Tim Mauerbach <
> tim.mauerb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am thinking about the structure of a new mailserver on top of
>> raid1/lvm/xen.
>>
>> Two different approaches come to my mind:
>>
>> 1. One big LV as DRBD backing device for
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Tim Mauerbach <
tim.mauerb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I am thinking about the structure of a new mailserver on top of
> raid1/lvm/xen.
>
> Two different approaches come to my mind:
>
> 1. One big LV as DRBD backing device for the whole guest (os + data).
> 2. One
Hi all,
I am thinking about the structure of a new mailserver on top of
raid1/lvm/xen.
Two different approaches come to my mind:
1. One big LV as DRBD backing device for the whole guest (os + data).
2. One small LV without drbd for the base system + one big LV as DRBD
backing device only for dat
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Chris Worley wrote:
> I'm using RHEL5.5/2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 and IB/SDP.
>
What version of DRBD are you using and what versions have you tried?
-JR
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbi
