Hi,
ldap_bind: Strong(er) authentication required (8)
additional info: BindSimple: Transport encryption required.
If you are using recent (4.7) samba, your problem could be that it
requires ssl ldap by default, unless you configure
ldap server require strong auth = no
in smb.con
Hi,
The question can perhaps be made more generic like this:
Can dovecot generate a *specific* NDR (or an autoreply) for accounts
that meet a specific criterium, such as:
- user account was found under OU=to-delete,CN=company...
contrary to the regular location CN=Users,CN=company...
We would
asily customize your ldap search base for accounts-to-be-deleted OU...
T.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 06:53:20PM +0100, lists wrote:
Hi,
The question can perhaps be made more generic like this:
Can dovecot generate a *specific* NDR (or an autoreply) for accounts
that meet a specific criterium, su
https://blog.andreev.it/?p=1975I have set up postfix and dovecot on both centos and freebsd using this person's blog. While you are using Debian, you might find the test procedures in this blog useful. You can test the set up without using an email client. That is the testing gets around client c
I have to say I'm totally baffled since I do nothing when LetsEncrypt renews
the certificate.
I know the cert has been updated because the mail clients asks me if I trust
the certificate.
If it makes a difference I use the bash LetsEncrypt not the Python code.
Original Message
As it turns out my cert was renewed Oct 3. I usually don't reply to these "lists" from my phone since I risk the wrath of people who hate top posting. I usually reply from a Linux desktop, not the phone, where I can bottom post. All that said, my phone mail client asked me if I t
You need SPF and DKIM for your outgoing email to be accepted.
My idea of a secure email server is to use submission port 587. Expose port 25
to the world and aggressively filter all remaining email ports with a firewall.
And I mean aggressive. Geographically filter so only countries where youe
You look spammy if you don't have SPF or DKIM, and hopefully both. Your email
will either be bounced or sent to a spam folder. You need a reverse pointer as
well, but that shouldn't be an issue. The situation is actually worse than it
sounds. ATT/SBC needs to whitelist you by IP if you are using
Good luck with all that coding. I have four years now of running my own email
server. Zero hacks. I keep the attack surface to a minimum. Less is more.
One thing you don't want to do is write your own code. This stuff is always way
harder than you think. Worse yet you run alpha generation code
I have no problems with Gmail from Digital Ocean. But I have both spf, DKIM,
DMARC and a reverse pointer. You need to not look spammy.
One advantage to using a VPS is your IP is unique. That is you don't share it
with a spammer. Not so with hosted services.
Original Message
I have used this person's blog for a few operating systems.
https://blog.andreev.it/?p=1975
Poke around for the correct OS. I only set up dovecot and postfix. Keep it
simple. You then need opendkim. I think opendkim checks the incoming mail.
There is another procedure to sign your mail.
When y
Actually the reverse pointer doesn't have to match. In fact this is impossible
if you are setting up virtual accounts on one server for different domains. You
just need to have a reverse pointer.
Most email servers look to seen if the reverse pointer has a "dyn" in it and
blocks those.
t: October 26, 2020 3:22 AMTo: li...@lazygranch.comCc: build+dove...@de-korte.org; dovecot@dovecot.orgSubject: Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server On 26. Oct 2020, at 11.36, lists <li...@lazygranch.com> wrote:Actually the reverse pointer doesn't have to m
As I previously stated the reverse pointer does not have to match your domain.
Suppose you ran a hosting company called host.com. Suppose you had clients
client1.com and client2.com. This requires virtual mailboxes. That is one
domain, host.com provides email services for client1.com and client
lookups. If it is your ip, it
is an easy request to have it changed.
-Original Message-
From: Sami Ketola [mailto:s...@ketola.io]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 11:22 AM
To: lists
Cc: Arjen de Korte; Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail
Ditto this. I pay for a VPS because I don't want my home facing the internet. If the VPS gets hacked, that is as far as they get. You could do a mail server on a $5 Digital Ocean or Linode VPS if you don't run SpamAssassin. Rather than have your email server on a 10 year old laptop, you let someo
I would have to also hack the email client since I don't enter my 20 character
high entropy password when I send or retrieve email.
You really need an email standard to integrate TOTP. To be realistic, you need
Gmail to use it. Whatever Gmail wants is essentially a defacto standard. I live
in t
And which email clients can do this?
A defacto standard needs to be adopted. If I don't provide SPF or DKIM, I am
likely to be deemed spammy, hence a defacto standard has been established. I
don't see this with TOTP.
I'm all for TOTP, but I'm not going to code my own.
Original
It would be worth a $5 VPS investment to set up a proper email server with
dovecot and postfix. Observe how they work together. Use maximum verbosity and
read the logs. You can use one of those cheap TLDs nobody but the spammers use.
They cost a dollar or so. Namecheap is peddling cyou.
O
https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh
I used the Neilpang bash script on Centos 7.
No drama. It just works. The only thing is because it works so well I am pretty
much useless to provide help with it because it has been so flawless. The only
way I know it is running is I have to accept new
I get about four of those a day. I was advised to learn how to use sieve. It is
on my list.
My goal is simply to dump any message with a Google form.
Original Message
From: jtam.h...@gmail.com
Sent: December 11, 2020 2:35 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: important
I have found opensuse to be very stable and the upgrades to be drama free IF
(big if) you stick to the distribution repositories. For a server, sticking to
the disty repos is very likely. It is desktop users (me) that load a lot of
software from other repos that occasionally muck things up.
I r
Hello,I found this link in the documentation:https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/dovemon/But where can I find the program "dovemon"? I searched all over whithout luck. In the source code, Google, nothing. It seems as only the web site would exist.Can somebody help me pleaseChristian Rößner
Don't enable the port in the firewall. Actually two ports (encrypted and not).
110 and 995.
Original Message
From: d...@newideatest.site
Sent: May 4, 2021 1:20 AM
To: m...@f1-outsourcing.eu; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: disable pop3 ports?
Already did all of that. like I said, EVERY
I meant in the firewall itself.
Usually when you set up a server none of thr ports are open in the firewall. At
some point you opened 110 and 995.
Original Message
From: d...@newideatest.site
Sent: May 4, 2021 2:41 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org; ml+dove...@valo.at
Subject: Re
This has been a long thread. In summary, do this:
From 10-master.conf (when using split config files)
service pop3-login {
net_listener pop3 {
port = 0
}
inet_listener pop3s {
port = 0
ssl = yes
}
This disables pop3 listeners even when the pop3 protocol is enabled.
-
R
I run a personal email server. I can't emphasize enough how geofencing has
reduced the useless hacking on my email server. I only leave port 25 open to
the world. I use port 587.
I maintain a list of hosting companies that I block from using my web server
since they are just going to scrape any
ort 25 for authorized IPs (auth_advertise_hosts in exim), thus the server will
refuse to allow outsiders to authenticate.
In combination with some other policies, my server is practically rock solid.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För lists
Skickat: den 15 juli
The unicode hack is in the comments. Google "Trojan Source". Having never dealt
with Hebrew and Arabic, it was news to me there is a right to left feature in
Unicode.
TWIT Security Now (MP3): SN 843: Trojan Source - Chrome 0-days, Windows 11
confusion, VoIP DDos attacks, Dune
https://pdst.fm/e
It seems to me that Oauth weakens security. You allow some other system into your system. Are you running your own email server? I see you are using Gmail for the listserv.If you run your own server there are other steps I would take first other than MFA, though MFA would be the best. Geofencing a
The thing I don't like is most 2FA token generators. Ultimately you need to transfer the polynomial that generates the code. Most do that with a QR image. Well so much for security! Others have a one time emergency code. Of course we are talking evil maid attacks, which granted is an unacceptable
If this isn't too far off topic, is it useful to register with https://www.dnswl.org/?p=209The only servers that reject my email do so because I use DigitalOcean. Spectrum for example. Oddly enough Linode which has a fair number of hackers doesn't get the same treatment. The only odd TLDs that ha
I block all my email ports except 25 from countries where I am not going to be
sending or receiving email. I also block many datacenters, but blocking Digital
Ocean, Vultur and AWS will get you 90%of the way there. You will need to use
587, that is no auth on 25. Again no blocking on 25, just bl
My email server is set up for port 587. I block all email ports other than port
25 from countries that I will not be sending or receiving email. This is really
only practical on a personal server. I also have a blocking file of data center
IPs. Port 25 is still open to the world but that has to
Hi,
I have tried to implement last_login with PostgreSQL and I found an old thread
from June 2019. I have found a simple solution that I want to share with you:
I followed the instructions on how to set up a last_login on the official
documentation. Therefor I creates a very simple table having
Hi,
I am playing around with the COI plugin and try to get things working.
I followed the Dovecot docs and also got the source from Github (dovecot/coi).
I have compiled and installed coi successfully.
IMAP seems to be fine, but LMTP has some errors in the logs, so I removed
imap_coi for the m
Am 23.04.2020 um 17:15 schrieb Aki Tuomi :
>
>
>> On 23/04/2020 18:12 li...@mlserv.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am playing around with the COI plugin and try to get things working.
>>
>> I followed the Dovecot docs and also got the source from Github
>> (dovecot/coi).
>>
>> I have compil
Hi,
I struggle with directory hashing. I want something like this:
/srv/mail/c/cf37a8dff5e360927ba10ab2
The final folder is simpel, as it is:
%{sha256;truncate=96:user}
But how do I get a first level from sha256? Unfortunately, the truncate option
aligns only full 8bit and does not divide int
> Am 11.05.2020 um 10:16 schrieb Aki Tuomi :
>
>
>> On 11/05/2020 11:10 Simone Lazzaris wrote:
>>
>>
>> In data lunedì 11 maggio 2020 10:00:38 CEST, li...@mlserv.org ha scritto:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I struggle with directory hashing. I want something like this:
>>>
>>> /srv/mail/c/cf37a8dff5e3
I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it for postfix
and dovecot also. I can tell you it is well supported. I am on Centos 7 using
firewalld.
Original Message
From: a...@ddns.com.au
Sent: May 21, 2020 11:01 PM
To: voy...@sbt.net.au
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subjec
m: je...@seibercom.net
Sent: May 22, 2020 3:38 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Reply-to: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: fail2ban setup centos 7 not picking auth fail?
On Thu, 21 May 2020 23:22:04 -0700, lists stated:
>I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it for
>postfix and dove
I get two or three of these a day. They are not from Gmail but have a "reply
to" address that is a Gmail account. The messages cone from an email account
that passes SPF and DKIM. So the sender and reply domains differ, but that
isn't unique. I have email that I need that arrives like that.
I a
FWIW, I use claws, which is about the only one not mentioned.
I don't like Thunderbird. For one thing, it is in caretaker status. Mozilla
believes Web based mail is the "future." I rather not run roundcube, given I
got hacked via an unpatched roundcube back when I was using a hosting company.
Claws is an active project.
I became roundcube free when I set up my own mail server.
I simply use an email client rather than a browser. Browsers can leak.
Comments about the retired TB:
https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/
Practically what this means is that in 2016,
So does mutt suck or not?
Original Message
From: Andreas Kalex
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:06 PM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?
since years mutt, 'cause it really sucks.
I tried TB or claws, evolution, opera but always returned to mutt.
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-8905/Roundcube.html
Original Message
From: robert k Wild
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:22 PM
To: li...@lazygranch.com
Reply To: Dovecot Mailing List
Cc: Andreas Kalex; dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Good email client to use with
I like vi (really vim), but I'm OK with Claws. I do most of my email on a
BlackBerry. (No, really.)
Original Message
From: Patrick Ben Koetter
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:15 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Good email client to use with Dovecot?
* li...@lazygranch.com :
> So do
Hi,
We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an
olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into
*@newdomain, I have configured:
cat /etc/postfix/canonical
@olddomain.com @newdomain.com
While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot
Hi,
Not sure what the lack of replies means... As postfix is also involved,
should I better ask there?
It seems a little bit in between postfix and dovecot...
Just to clearify one thing I wrote:
On 22-8-2017 16:23, lists wrote:
We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfi
For the archives:
On 23-8-2017 21:56, Noel wrote:
Perhaps you can adjust your query or your database to return the
desired result. Otherwise, use your scripting skills to generate a
file, then automate the procedure.
I ended up creating a file /etc/postfix/olddomain with this contents:
/^([
No problem sending email, but I can't receive email. Diagnostics follow:
a login u...@domain.com password
a OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT
SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND
URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHI
It now works. I have no idea why now and not yesterday. I had booted the
server yesterday and that didn't fix it.
Thank for your help.
On 15-3-2016 14:05, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi,
Just want to know if this is a problem at my end (in my browser), or if
it is something else.
When I copy text from the wiki, the page changes to an edit one; that is
very, very annoying. How can I stop this if it is normal dovecot wiki
behavio
I'm not getting a hit on "Dovecot pwck". Can you elaborate.
Original Message
From: Mobile Phone
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 3:20 AM
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Reply To: supp...@eceb.co.uk
Subject: Re: Intermittent IMAP Login failures - about 25% fail
SOLVED: Should anyone else run into this and
Are you 100% sure your interpretation of the FCC rules is correct? Do you
really want passwords going out over RF unencrypted?
As far as I know, only ham bands are not allowed to use encryption. Even baby
monitors these days are DECT. (Mind you, not good encryption.)
Original Message
Fro
I'm not a FCC lawyer, just a ham. Seems to me all you could do is "sign"
messages and not send them if the sign isn't correct. The package itself is in
plain text.
Anyway, I'll leave the thread but would like to hear about the final solution.
Original Message
From: Michael Fox
Sent: Thu
I have just switched my mail server. I have copied (I think) the config files
from the old to new. Exim is work fine on the new machine as I can see email
file showing up in /var/mail/lists/new . However, dovecot reports nothing when
I check mail . I am have turn on logging on both machines
o new. Exim is work fine on the new machine as I can see email
> file showing up in /var/mail/lists/new . However, dovecot reports nothing
> when I check mail . I am have turn on logging on both machines and I do not
> see anything that looks like an error. I have also looked to see if t
Hi all,
We're looking at upgrading our current mail platform from 1.0.15 to
2.x to take advantage of the new director functionality.
Our main concern is the number of mailboxes involved (circa. 300K) and
the rebuilding of the index files, especially as it seems that once
you've upgraded,
Quoting Ed W :
Hi, don't have an installation of anything approaching your size.
However, I do regularly see folks missing out on the idea that its
reasonably straightforward to have both Dovecot (old) and Dovecot (new)
versions running at the same time and migrate users over slowly rather
than i
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 1.3.2011, at 18.57, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
Yeah, we're actually now thinking that we should create a new
cluster running dovecot 2.0, mount the existing control/maildir
files from the current shared storage and then regenerate the
indices before go
Hi all,
We've just provisioned a new cluster of dovecot nodes running Centos
and Dovecot 1.0.15 (we needed to match the original configuration,
we're upgrading to 1.2 next week!).
The nodes are currently equally allocated (50/50 split) to IMAP and
POP3, with the intention to move them int
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
On 7/11/2011 1:24 AM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:48 +0100, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
We have noticed that the IMAP servers appear to be under much less
load and utilising drastically less RAM than the POP3 servers and I'm
wonderin
Hi Stan,
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
On 7/11/2011 4:28 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
This still doesn't provide us with the necessary information to give you
an intelligent answer to your question.
Sorry, I thought I'd given quite a large amount of detail so far
* All the servers are made by the same manufacturer (Dell)
* They are all the same model (R410)
* The have the same engine (24 cores, 24G RAM, SAS Drives)
The R410 is a two socket Xeon box with max 2 x 6 core CPUs. The 24 CPUs
you see is the result of HyperThreading being enabled. I'd disable
Is there a more appropriate list on which to ask for assistance in
coding Sieve rules, or may I ask here?
Bump? Nobody using mail-crypt right now (with user keys encrypted by
user's password to work transparently from, say, Thunderbird) who could
share their config?
On 12/02/2020 11:54 pm, Alex Knowles wrote:
Hi all,
I just joined the list. I've read through the mail-crypt plugin docs
here https
Bumping one last time in hope for assistance.
On 18-02-20 6:44pm, dovecot.li...@graphyc.io wrote:
Bump? Nobody using mail-crypt right now (with user keys encrypted by
user's password to work transparently from, say, Thunderbird) who could
share their config?
On 12/02/2020 11:54 pm, Alex Knowl
Keywords: dovecot, dict, quota, postgre sql, broken pipe, remote
disconnected
Having Dovecot 2.2.22 (fe789d2) with Postgre SQL 9.5
(9.5.5-0ubuntu0.16.04) as the backend. I do not understand why quota
service is not working, not seeing it as a configuration error at least.
My quotas are DICT/S
On 2017-02-08 00:10, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017, ygrishin-li...@mail2.ca wrote:
service dict {
unix_listener dict {
mode = 0660
user = Debian-exim
group = Debian-exim
}
}
dovecot-lda-erros.log:
**
Feb 04 14:2
Solved the problem, reporting back to the community.
/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql-user.conf had been lacking dovecot group
permissions. It was 700/root:root.
However why it wasn't reported by Dovecot explicitly in the log -- the
greatest mystery to me. Now, after deleting dovecot and all its
Hello everyone,
For this installation I am using passdb against AD, userdb with MySQL and nfs
storage but using simultaneously the vfile acl backend and the shared mailbox
dictionary I get the following panic:
Oct 19 12:34:51 server dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
rip=10.112.99.
Hello everyone,
For this installation I am using passdb against AD, userdb with MySQL and nfs
storage but using simultaneously the vfile acl backend and the shared mailbox
dictionary I get the following panic:
Oct 19 12:34:51 server dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN,
rip=10.112.99.
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 12:26, mailing lists wrote:
>
>> Oct 19 12:34:51 server dovecot: dict(7540): Panic: file dict-sql.c: line 670
>> (sql_dict_iterate): assertion failed: ((ctx->flags &
>> DICT_ITERATE_FLAG_ASYNC) != 0)>
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dov
Hi all,
is there any way of exclude messages storaged in alternate storage (*dbox
mailbox format) from being included in the quota usage?
I think this is not possible but let me ask.
Hi all,
is there any way of exclude messages storaged in alternate storage (*dbox
mailbox format) from being included in the quota usage?
I think this is not possible but let me ask.
Morning all, I've managed to work my self into a corner and hoping someone
can help me out
I have OpenLDAP and Dovecot installed based on the following documents:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DovecotLDAP
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OpenLDAPServer
When Dovecot is set up to log in
Hello,
I spend a couple of days configurating a new installation of dovecot 2.0.14
with virtual accounts and NFS storage for maildir home/mail directories.
At this point I need shared mailboxes but since user mail/home locations are
ldap attributes, how is it supposed I must configure this for
Hello all,
If I have several postfix/dovecot-lda boxes with shared nfs storage, how
director helps in this scenario? is it necesary to use lmtp instead of
dovecot-lda?
With postfix/dovecot-lda boxes incoming mail happens at the smtp layer but
director redirects are working in the lmtp/imap/pop
Hello,
On 09/07/2011 07:22 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 6.9.2011, at 14.27, mailing lists wrote:
>> At this point I need shared mailboxes but since user mail/home locations are
>> ldap attributes, how is it supposed I must configure this for shared
>> mailboxes?
>>
JF, thank you for the reply.
I'm just curious how to big players fix this problem, which seems impact
systems with shared storage.
Have a nice day.
On 09/07/2011 12:59 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:26:28AM +0100, mailing lists wrote:
>> Hello all
On 09/08/2011 03:07 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 12:14 +0100, mailing lists wrote:
>
>> yes, my virtual users have separate directories for home and mail.
>> Their locations are stored in ldap attributes (with random generated
>> paths), so a flat sch
(I'm sorry for breaking the thread with each mail)
On 09/09/2011 10:04 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:18:40AM +0100, mailing lists wrote:
>>
>> and how to I might configure dovecot to use the mail directory as a
>> subdirectory of the home
and for the time that user001 execute the imap 'list' command, this is the log
trace in dovecot:
Sep 9 13:09:12 imap1 dovecot: imap(user001): Debug: Namespace : type=shared,
prefix=shared.%u., sep=., inbox=no, hidden=no, list=children, subscriptions=no
location=maildir:%h/mailSubDir:INDEX=~/
Hello,
what this message means?
"NO Unknown subscription namespace."
the shared namespace is visible and I can fetch messages from it, but
subscription fails with the above message.
(user002 is sharing the folder named docs-users002 with user user001)
# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Con
Hello,
Following Jan-Frode's advise I am trying this configuration:
{postfix} ---lmtp---> {director} ---lmtp---> {dovecot}
so I have two dovecot instances for director/proxy and lmtp delivery on ports
1024 and 24 respectively.
whilst for imap connections I can specify a pool of imap backend s
On 09/13/2011 08:34 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 04:55:51PM +0100, mailing lists wrote:
>>
>> director_mail_servers = 101.180.245.101
>> director_servers = 101.180.245.101
it works with imap connections, so I assumed it also would do it for lm
Hello,
it works!!
I was missing this line
"auth_socket_path = director-userdb"
Sep 13 10:26:12 imap1 dovecot: auth: Debug: master in: PASS 1
user...@example.com service=lmtp lip=100.180.245.101 lport=1024 8
Sep 13 10:26:12 imap1 dovecot: auth: Debug:
static(user...@examp
Hello all,
today I got this crash from dovecot (2.0.14)
Sep 29 14:09:32 imap1 dovecot: lmtp(17693): Panic: file lmtp-proxy.c: line 370
(lmtp_proxy_output_timeout): assertion failed: (proxy->data_input->eof)
Sep 29 14:09:32 imap1 dovecot: lmtp(17693): Error: Raw backtrace:
/usr/lib64/dovecot/li
Hello all,
why I can run whis command:
imap1:~ # doveadm user user001
userdb: user001
mail : maildir:/var/maildir/vol04/4/46/user001
home : /var/mailfilter/vol04/4/46/user001
quota_rule: *:bytes=1
but not this one:
imap1:~ # doveadm quota get -u user001
doveadm(user001
Hello,
How I can share a folder with dots when the listescape plugin is enabled?
In this example user001 is sharing two foders named "docs-abc" and "docs-a.b.c"
to user002.
The first folder (without dots) is seen by user002 but the second is not found
by dovecot because it search a system fo
On 10/06/2012 12:02 PM, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Hi Luigi,
with regard to SSL my configuration is much more simple and it works
fine with IPv4 and IPv6. But you have of course to use a hostname
matching the certificates common name.
You could add additional hostnames in the certificate by spe
Hello,
I'm testing passdb auth binds with dovecot 2.0.16, but for some reason dovedm
fails to work with the configuration showed below. The network trace shows the
successful bind for the administrative user (uid=mailapp), but nothing for the
mail user (uid=user001).
what am i missing here?
Hello,
>> # doveadm mailbox list -u user001
>> doveadm(user001): Error: user user001: Auth PASS lookup failed
>> doveadm(user001): Fatal: passdb lookup failed
> Are you running this on a Dovecot proxy? It looks like doveadm wants to do a
> passdb lookup to find out which server should handle t
On 12/22/2012 09:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
because they are too lazy to lern how tu buld
packages for their distribution which is at
least for redhat-based distribution trivial
Calling people lazy is a bit over the top now isn't it? The reason that
organizations use Red Hat RHEL is, among ot
Andre Rodier wrote:
>* If the sieve vacation script had to use a counter for limits per
> day, where this counter is supposed to be stored ? I cant see any
> dovecot file. I have temporary try to use 0777 for
> home/sieve/maildir folders, but no file is created at all.
You don'
Richard Hobbs wrote:
> I'm running Debian Lenny 5.0 btw - does anyone know if these keys were
> simply part of the dovecot package, or whether they have been generated
> during the installation process and are therefore unique?
In Debian Lenny (and Etch) those keys are generated during the
instal
LuKreme wrote:
> 1) what do I need to do to convert or prepare the courier maildirs for
> dovecot?
See here : http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration
> 2) is the current setup of virtual users reasonable for dovecot?
> 2.1) Is there a better option than postfixadmin?
I'm happily using Dovecot + Po
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:15:45 -0600 (CST) da...@davidwbrown.name wrote:
Hi,
>> Hello, Dovecot bunch and Timo. I am using Sylpheed as my
>> Dovecot/IMAP client. At home behind my LAN Sylpheed can send email
>> because the Postfix SMTPd views my LAN as a trusted network. No
>> such luck when I'm awa
Patrick Nagel wrote:
> You could go for bogofilter (purely Bayesian).
-- cut --
> The solution was inspired by a Gentoo Wiki article
> (http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/Bogofilter).
If it's not just for personal use, but on a mailserver with quite some
users I'd like to happily recommend ASSP. http://
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
