Hello list,
I would like to configure POP3 email such that user "mark" (only) must be
able to retrieve email from my machine using POP3 from within mydomain.com
Any ideas?
By the way, my version is: 1.0.7
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I would like to configure POP3 email such that user "mark" (only) must be
> able to retrieve email from my machine using POP3 from within mydomain.com
>
> Any ideas?
>
natelly) I believe it´s not :(
[]s
Fernando
> Hi,
>
> I was following the earlier namespaces discussion and I would like to
> repost a doubt. I need to have some kind of archiving, it means, store old
> messages into a cheap storage. But I couldn´t think any other solution
> than s
Hi list,
Have you ever heard or tried mogilefs? (http://danga.com/mogilefs/)
Do you think suitable for dovecot/mail environments ?
Regards,
Fernando
option and discussed sometimes in the list. I think it´s an
unnecessary overhead and bottleneck.
As brainstorm. How about Cassandra, Tokyo-Tirant, Redis, and so on. Have you
ever worked or tested one of them at production or even testing environment ?
What do you think ?
Best Regards,
Fernando
message and creating dovecot indexes).
(version, 1.1.16)
Best Regards,
Fernando
Hi,
I´m planning to change our maildrop lda to deliver, but I need to devel a
plugin in order to have some custom filtering.
Are there any documentation regarding how to develop a dovecot plugin -
tips, tricks, etc ?
Thanks,
Fernando
nts.
Have you ever implemented any archive solution working with dovecot ?
Regards,
Fernando
I would like 'some process' to store old mails at a cheap storage.
I know how to do it with symlinks, but I don´t know if it is the best
option. So, I´m asking if dovecot improves it somehow.
Fernando
fernando at dfcom.com.br schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I´m using dovecot at our st
wer
(server1, server2, server3, ... , serverN).
3- Scalability - the more servers, the more i/o load you can share.
Well, sorry for the long post...but I hope to collaborate with some ideas
(even if they are stupid :( )
Regards,
Fernando Bertasso Figaro
will be stored where
the users want to.
I also like the idea to user some database to store message index.
Fernando
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:00 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
>> this is very weird and (at same time) very interesting approach. Instead
>> of put all messages in
ecot just access 'in parallel' a set of servers,
requesting their informations (really, with imap connection) and caches
them - the results (maybe in some database, as you suggested). It would be
an extension of the proxy feature that already exists at dovecot.
Fernando
> On Tue,
Hi Timo,
Do you have any experience using Dovecot and Glusterfs ? How about the
maturity of Glusterfs in a huge email environment ?
Fernando
> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 12:12 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
>> Hi Timo,
>>
>> Yes it´s related, but I don´t understand &#x
x27; setup would be to receive a message by lmtp
and delivers it to an external command (like maildrop). Would it be
possible. ?
Best Regards,
Fernando
dovecot indexes (which lib and/or function from dovecot I need to use ?)
Best Regards,
Fernando
liver' function and call the dovecot one.
Do you have any tip how to do that, I mean, witch function to use there ?
How about quota, can I let maildrop or dovecot (through the api) update it
(I believe that let maildrop do that makes more sense)?
Thanks,
Fernando
> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:23
?
Thanks,
Fernando
> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 19:12 -0300, ferna...@dfcom.com.br wrote:
>> But I like the idea maildrop calling the dovecot api to save the message
>> into the maildir.
>>
>> And yes, my patches don´t touch the maildir delivery. So, I can just
>> change t
;$basename" "$i" 2>/dev/null
exitStatus="$?"
done
chown "$uid"."$gid" "$i"
touch -m -d "$modify" "$i"
echo "OK"
done
This script reads the zip-list.txt and co
disk - ex. huge
sata one) storing files older than 30 days and through virtual folders
join these messages in a common virtual INBOX while acessing imap or pop3
?
What do you thing, would you have another better approach ?
Best Regards,
Fernando
Hi there, I am having some trouble implementing a quota proxy server for a
memcached based dict (I am using the version 2.2.15).
I created a multi-threaded daemon that is using non-blocking sockets to receive
the data and reply to dovecot. Right now everything but the atomic increase
message is
).
Best Regards,
Fernando
Dovecot version: 1.2.rc3
Dovecot Details:
# 1.2.rc3: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.18-128.el5 i686 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3
(Tikanga)
base_dir: /usr/local/dovecot/var/run/dovecot/
protocols: imap pop3
ssl: no
other clients insert an '\n' here, but squirrelmail.
2) When this king of message (above) is compressed (in order to use zlib
plugin), dovecot dies.
Best Regards,
Fernando
charset" "iso-8859-1") NIL NIL "8bit"
*1 0*NIL NIL NIL NIL) "alternative" ("boundary"
"=_20090512171902_78105") NIL
NIL NIL))
A004 OK Fetch completed.
>From RFC the red numbers mean: size body, number of line for the body. This
makes sense, because stripping the 'control' chars from first message, size
and number of lines match. But in the second message, the line number is 0 -
this does not make sense.
You need to test this using telnet, because outlook and thunderbird did not
follow this way, they use body.peek.
What do you think?
Fernando
o script, one written in bash and
another in perl.
Bash Script:
#!/bin/sh
exec "$@"
Perl Script
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
exec('"$@"');
The thing is, the Bash script works and the Perl
one doesn't, it comes the error stated above...
I think the problem could be from perl, for
forking the process, but still I can't figure
it out.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Fernando
ince 2.2.5. Had someone had this same problem?
Thanks,
Fernando
:48:07 imap(xxx@xxx): Info: expunge: box=INBOX, uid=3,
msgid=<5520ed0fedee4e3386d08c98d249a...@lab.imap>, size=1898
This is exactly the sizes I see in the maildirsize. But I think these values
should be equals.
1073741824S
2136 1
1048 1
-1898 -1
Att
Fernando
De: fernando.fig..
sed size)? Are you delivering
mails via Dovecot LDA/LMTP?
>
> 1073741824S
> 2136 1
> 1048 1
> -1898 -1
>
> Att
> Fernando
>
>
> De: fernando.fig...@uol.com.br
> Enviada: Quarta-feira, 15 de Janeiro de 2014 15:11
> Para: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Assunto: [Dov
Hello Ron,
On 14/11/2014 15:15, Ron Leach wrote:
Does this example mean that LMTP will only listen for input messages
from the interface with IP address 192.168.0.24 (plus localhost)? If
so, I probably haven't understood how LMTP is intended to work. Is
there a reason why we want to limit
capability.
Does anyone has other news regarding this issue ?
Thanks,
Fernando
at correct ? This is what I could understand from my tests.
Thanks,
Fernando
De: fernando.fig...@uol.com.br
Enviada: Quarta-feira, 4 de Fevereiro de 2015 23:15
Para: dovecot@dovecot.org
Assunto: lazy_expunge + mdbox
Hi,
I'm studying an issue related to mdbox and lazy_expunge. If it i
:89
Apr 18 14:25:16 mail dovecot[25013]: auth: Warning: Event 0x126eb420
leaked (parent=0x0): auth-client-connection.c:338
It's neccesary to restart dovecot, and once restarted the server start
to work fine again and deliver emails
What do you think i could do?
Thank you, best regards
Fernando
31 matches
Mail list logo
