Hi,
This is my first time using this group and I have the same question as
the subject. I can't seem to get dovecot to read a mbox inbox that is
in /var/mail/%u with /home/%u/Maildir as maildir. This just worked on
my old server that I am now upgrading to AlmaLinux release 9.3 with
dovecot
leted=0 expunged=0
trashed=0 hdr_count=0 hdr_bytes=0 body_count=0 body_bytes=0
On 3/26/2024 2:37 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 26/03/2024 00:02 EET Will wrote:
Hi,
This is my first time using this group and I have the same question as
the subject. I can't seem to get dovecot to rea
Hi Folks,
I am having a problem configuring imapsieve via dovecot-pidgeonhole on CentOS7.
After following the docs here:
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/IMAPSieve
I get:
dovecot[22026]: managesieve: Fatal: Plugin 'sieve_imapsieve' not found from
directory /usr/lib64/dovecot
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Christian Kivalo wrote:
>
>
> On June 7, 2018 6:47:54 PM GMT+02:00, Will Foster wrote:
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >I am having a problem configuring imapsieve via dovecot-pidgeonhole on
> >CentOS7.
> >
> >After
I thought I had sieve working I could create the rules in TB and it says it's communicating properly and saves the file but the sieve rules do not seem to be
working.
when I look at /var/spool/maildir/domain/user
I see
Maildir
Maildir =uid=1000
inside Maildir =uid=1000/sieve
I see my sieve s
System basics
Centos 7.3
Dovecot 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4)
I am working on a replacement mail server for work and one of the features I
wanted was ldap authentication
After much fiddling I got it to work.
But I encountered a issue where two different methods of testing a mail account
resulte
I have pretty much everything working fine.
I have run into one issue with the filters that I am unsure where this a filter
is being set.
Dovecot 2.2.32 (dfbe293d4)
I have setup dovecot-ldap.conf.ext to control my LDAP query's
My current layout used filters based on looking at the posixAccount
lude auth-sql.conf.ext
!include auth-ldap.conf.ext
#!include auth-passwdfile.conf.ext
#!include auth-checkpassword.conf.ext
#!include auth-vpopmail.conf.ext
#!include auth-static.conf.ext
ldap is the only auth system I am using.
>
> > On 02.11.2017 23:59, Will Merkens wrote:
> &
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 02:42:00PM +0100, A. Schulze wrote:
> Thomas Preissler:
> The logging is right, but SSLv3 isn't used.
> Today it's not uncommon that application /log/ SSLv3, where they /mean/ TLS1.x
>
> Some days ago where TLSv1 became available there wasn't a great
> difference between
Is Dovecot Director compatible across Dovecot versions? i.e. 2.0.x to
2.1.x or 2.2.x? I have a 6 host cluster in a director configuration
which is getting somewhat aged, but it would be very beneficial if the
director hosts could be upgraded seamlessly.
Is such a thing possible, or will their
I've been trying to upgrade Dovecot-ee package (on EL6/x86_64) from
2.2.15.8-1 to 2.2.16.2-1. It's complaining on these two dependencies:
liblz4.so.1
libtextcat.so.0
These would both seem to be related to plugins, and don't seem to be
required as package dependencies by the RPM fr
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:53:26PM -0600, Eric Broch wrote:
> On 4/2/2015 1:22 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
> > I've been trying to upgrade Dovecot-ee package (on EL6/x86_64) from
> > 2.2.15.8-1 to 2.2.16.2-1. It's complaining on these two dependencies:
> >
> >
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:28:32AM +0900, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 03 Apr 2015, at 04:22, Will Yardley wrote:
> > I've been trying to upgrade Dovecot-ee package (on EL6/x86_64) from
> > 2.2.15.8-1 to 2.2.16.2-1. It's complaining on these two dependencies:
This is with dovecot-ee 2.2.18.2 on RHEL6
To handle backend and frontend on same machine, I'm using the following
hack, as previously outlined here:
[in director instance config]
passdb {
# See thread ending in:
# http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2012-June/083817.html
# for why this
g for
is a solution which will allow multiple messages to be compressed into a
single compressed file, while still allowing those messages to be
accessed via IMAP. The reasoning behind this is that most of my incoming
mail consists of many very-similar messages (for example, it is not
unheard of
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 17:05 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-05-12 4:56 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 2010-05-12 8:44 AM, Will Palmer wrote:
> >> Googling around, I've seen a lot of messages related to compressing
> >> individual messages in a maildir. Howe
can get it to do. But to hand-wave with "text compresses well" seems
mathematically absurd. 5X > X.
Feel free to ignore this message, as I've passed the point of practical
necessity long ago.
--
-- Will
Hi Edward Carraro,
I see you got your goal.
So I have same trouble and don´t solved.
I used the three scenarios you used.
based in http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/%VirtualUsers
And tried using the lmtp, but too don´t worked to delivery mail, I use
dovecot-lda to sieve plugin work.
Please help me.
Hi,
Can you help me?
Because my config in master.cf is:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -f ${sender} -d
${user}@${nexthop}
But now I have this problem in my postfix, logs:
"fatal destination user parameter (-d user) not given"
It´s funny
an dovecot-uidlist, at least) to
something that Dovecot will read, or to configure Dovecot's pop3 to use
a UIDL format that will work, as mentioned in the migration wiki. We
have some "squeaky wheel" users who don't have their POP clients set to
delete messages, and are likely to
Sorry for the self-followup...
Looks like I just needed to look at the Courier v0 instructions and set
pop3_uidl_format = %f
That seems to work as expected, and the bonus is, I'll have the UIDLs
the clients expect without any conversion.
/wby
l
However, these two posts (from 2013) seem to say that it will not:
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2013-November/093776.html
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2013-November/093809.html
When I try to just set =proxy_maybe=y in my LDAP config's pass_attrs,
and not have an explicit
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:26:37PM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>
> > And how can you do it for the entire server?
>
> Well, as I said, "in postfix". It's your MTA all your users are going
> through. How to do it with postfix, I don't know, because I do not run
> no postfix.
OT for this list, bu
you
a starting point. Lots of examples online.
I haven't played with it much, but I think there are some things that
will let you do some extended logging of IMAP commands from within
Dovecot - that might be a better way to figure out why the user's client
doesn't seem to be noticing the
I'm experiencing some problems similar to those described in
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-July/137250.html
except with 2.0.9.
Adding http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-July/084906.html
to the main config didn't seem to help, nor did setting the list of
director and backend servers to ju
And I realize that doveadm isn't setup properly yet, and that
director_doveadm_port needs to be doveadm's inet_listener, not
director's as it is now. Presumably this should just affect being able
to run doveadm, though, and not cause the problems I mentioned?
It would be really convenient if runni
I'm guessing this is the most significant issue:
Jun 3 16:22:33 retr01 dovecot: director: Fatal: No inet_listeners defined for
director service (for standalone keep director_servers empty)
What confuses me, is that not only do I have this in my config:
service director {
fifo_listener login/
So, going to latest 2.2 RPM from ATRPMs does seem to fix the problem
(that is, the same config works as expected).
So, my question then is, in terms of indices, dovecot-uidlist, etc., is
it safe to move from Dovecot 1.0.7 directly to 2.2.10?
Also, even if I put:
doveadm_socket_path = localhost:88
Tried mailing the maintainer, but didn't get a response -- anyone know
what's happened to the ATrpms repo?
Not only is
http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/
empty, but:
http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/
seems to return a 404. Some of the mirrors still have the packages, but
does anyone know if the
I have directors and backend servers running on the same systems (x3).
To be able to run doveadm foo with a minimum of fuss (without having to
list socket paths explicitly), should it be the director that's the
"default"? If so, is it safe to symlink '/var/run/dovecot' to
'/var/run/dovecot-director
> does anyone know if they're going to continue to build 2.2.x packages?
>
> avoid ATrpms
>
> enable this repo unconditionally sooner or later will *** your
> OS installation because he overrides base packages often in
> incompatible ways and mixed with sane rep
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:04:22PM +, Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 03:42 AM Will Yardley wrote:
> > Not only is
> > http://atrpms.net/name/dovecot/
> > empty, but:
> > http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el6/
> > seems to return a 404. Some of the mir
When restarting Dovecot 2.2.10 (via atrpms) on RHEL 6, I get the error:
Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (1024 <
4096), because of default_client_limit
# doveconf default_internal_user
default_internal_user = dovecot
Should dovecot print this warning based on
t linking to
Mail.{Trash,Sent,Drafts} (the indented ones), don't work.
What's the easiest way to get the new setup working in a way that will
cause the least change (preferably no change) to end-users.
TIA
w
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:31:42PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> namespace private {
> separator = .
> prefix = Mail.
> inbox = yes
> }
ps - Will simply making the Mail. namespace "hidden" fix the problem,
while keeping things backwards compatible for clients who ha
ldn't have errors logged (since admin can't usually do anything
> about them anyway).
Depends on the environment; in many cases, the admin could, or may even
be expected to, raise the quota.
Also, you're assuming that users will be able to interpret an error
message, even a clear on
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 06:24:47PM +0200, Luuk wrote:
> On 10-8-2014 06:18, Will Yardley wrote:
> > Depends on the environment; in many cases, the admin could, or may even
> > be expected to, raise the quota.
>
> !but should not!
>
> Quota should be set according
I'm seeing some similar problems, sometimes, but not always, resulting
in a backtrace -- recently migrated (where we had POP3 access via an old
version of Courier, and IMAP via an older version of Dovecot; rebuilt
the indices for POP3 users using the script). A few cases, where it
looks like Doveco
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:33:52AM +0200, Patrick De Zordo wrote:
> To backup all mail (incoming and outgoing), BCC all mails, you could
> do the following..
> Add to your "/etc/postfix/main.cf" the following:
> ---8<
Couple questions about running doveadm with multiple instances... I have
Dovecot 2.2.13 on RHEL6 running across 3 boxes, each with a director and
main instance running. When I try to lookup something on the main
instance (which is handling user auth) via its auth-userdb socket
directly, I get an er
I am using Dovecot 2.2.13, which doesn't yet seem to have the
$auth_cache_negative parameter. Should the negative cache value honor
$auth_cache_ttl then?
I had a problem where some of our ldap systems were reinitialized. Some
users, presumably those who tried to login while their records were
retu
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 02:34:34AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 19.09.2014 um 02:09 schrieb Will Yardley:
> >
> > Also, how can I flush the cache for a non-default instance's cache using
> > doveadm -- "doveadm auth cache flush" doesn'
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 08:21:51AM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, Will Yardley wrote:
>
> > Also, how can I flush the cache for a non-default instance's cache using
> > doveadm -- "doveadm auth cache flush" doesn't seem to have an '-
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:41:14PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> (is it connecting to the wrong instance's auth socket? the path to the
> 'main' instance's auth socket is /var/run/dovecot-main/auth-master)
>
> and then I see
> # doveadm -i main auth cache flu
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:55:51AM +0300, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> On 09/19/2014 03:04 AM, Will Yardley wrote:
> > director_doveadm_port = 8889
[]
> > doveadm_proxy_port =
> In the 2.2 series you can write this as "doveadm_port", I think.
Thanks for the heads
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:01:01PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I run dovecot on FreeBSD and its in ports.. no issues at all and the
> maintainer keeps it current.
I don't use it very much (mostly read mail locally, and it's a
single-user system), but I have no problems with Dovecot (2.2.x, bui
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:03:57PM +0200, Philon wrote:
>
> I’m really curious as to if I really understand you correctly. Neither Exim
> nor Postfix do need to support any mailbox format. They both should hand
> incoming mail to either LDA or LMTP.
Postfix has an LDA (local(8)). I believe Exim a
Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config
(in a way that's sane)?
ssl_protocols (>= 2.1)
and
ssl_cipher_list
co-exist, or are they mutually exclusive?
I have a Dovecot 2.2.13 system, and I tried setting:
I also tried things like
ssl_cipher_list = HIGH
or
ssl_ciphe
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
> > Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config
> > (in a way that's sane)?
>
> > Is there a way to exclude these ciphers, while sti
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:34:50AM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 12/1/2014 9:44 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> >> On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
> >>> Can you use both ssl_protocols *an
I had some problems the first few times I restarted with ssl-params
seeming to hang, but it finally works.
I am able to get it to work with just:
ssl = required
ssl_dh_parameters_length = 4096
ssl_parameters_regenerate = 0
ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = yes
ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3
ssl_cipher_li
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:12:22AM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 12/2/2014 10:05 AM, Will Yardley wrote:
> > I had some problems the first few times I restarted with ssl-params
> > seeming to hang, but it finally works.
>
> That would have been dovecot generating the 4
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:08:38PM -0700, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2014, at 07:24, Davide wrote:
> > Hi to all, i found that dovecot-ee repository access is free 0,00 $
> > cost; i'm running dovecot community 2.2.13 can i migrate my system
> > to dovecot-ee? What are difference between D
53 matches
Mail list logo
