ditional weight for spam scoring.
Some time ago there was a similar discussion on the postfix ML and I had
pretty much the same arguments that you had.
But as a matter of fact, I got corrected. The major problem with even
scoring is that the only things spammers have to do (and they really do
it!)
vent spamming but is quite useful
when it comes to prevent phishing.
That's why we don't use it even for spam scoring anymore. It is not
worth the resources, IMHO again at least :-)
- --
Udo Rader
http://www.bestsolution.at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux
creases the
burden on MySQL ...
We are also testing the webinterface that eGroupWare [1] provides and
are very impressed by its completeness (sieve integration, message
filters and much more).
[1] http://www.egroupware.org
--
Udo Rader
bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
http://www.bestsolutio
ocket:
type: listen
client:
path: /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
mode: 432
user: postfix
group: postfix
---CUT---
--
Udo Rader, CTO
http://www.bestsolution.at
Udo Rader schrieb:
Hi,
we have recently been hit by a couple of brute force password attacks
against dovecot. So what I want to do now is to add dovecot to fail2ban
in order to block further attacks.
However, I don't seem to be able to find out password verifification
failures for our
Udo Rader schrieb:
Udo Rader schrieb:
Hi,
we have recently been hit by a couple of brute force password attacks
against dovecot. So what I want to do now is to add dovecot to
fail2ban in order to block further attacks.
However, I don't seem to be able to find out password verifific
Seth Mattinen schrieb:
Udo Rader wrote:
Udo Rader schrieb:
Hi,
we have recently been hit by a couple of brute force password attacks
against dovecot. So what I want to do now is to add dovecot to
fail2ban in order to block further attacks.
However, I don't seem to be able to fin
want lots of details, turn on debugging.
Yes, that is certainly the case. It is 1.0.15 from debian unstable.
--
Udo Rader, CTO
http://www.bestsolution.at
Stewart Dean schrieb:
This weekend we had a runaway email endless loop. When it was killed
after 18 hours, my inbox had 135,000 messages in it...there were two
messages that were being endlessly sent and bounced and I'm on the
postmaster alias. Thunderbird was able to do a mass select of one
->eof)
Jan 10 17:16:17 Carolyn dovecot: [ID 398108 mail.error] Raw backtrace:
what does
ldd /opt/Dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login give?
--
Udo Rader
http://www.bestsolution.at
o.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
libdoor.so.1 => /lib/libdoor.so.1
libuutil.so.1 => /lib/libuutil.so.1
libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1
libssl_extra.so.0.9.7 => /usr/sfw/lib/libssl_extra.so.0.9.7
libcrypto_extra.so.0.9.7 =>
/usr/sf
Filip Francis wrote:
Udo Rader wrote:
Filip Francis wrote:
r...@carolyn /opt/Dovecot/etc # ldd
/opt/Dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
libssl.so.0.9.7 => /opt/coolstack/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7
libcrypto.so.0.9.7 =>/opt/coolstack/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7
libr
tually been paying for Dovecot features for about 3
years now.
Wow, congrats!
Looks like a typical 'working is s much more fun than studying'
thing :-)
--
Udo Rader, CTO
http://www.bestsolution.at
il_chroot=/home
but the entire point of chrooting is _changing_ the root directory.
So it seems quite obvious that you need to strip your homedirs yourself.
How else could you otherwise define /home/home/test if you really wanted
to do?
--
Udo Rader, CTO
http://www.bestsolution.at
st kill
myself now. http://wiki.dovecot.org/TimeMovedBackwards
--CUT---
So as you see, dovecot successfully logged a message on 14:02 and then
complained about the time having shifted 4397 seconds on 14:04 ...
Thanks in advance
--
Udo Rader, CTO
http://www.bestsolution.at
http://riaschissl.blogspot.com
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/30/2009, Udo Rader (list...@bestsolution.at) wrote:
The virtual guest is Centos 5.4 based with dovecot 1.2.8 (at first we
also tried with the original 1.0.7 (?) dovecot shipped with Centos).
I wrote "alleged time shift" because there is no timeshift
what
Udo Rader wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/30/2009, Udo Rader (list...@bestsolution.at) wrote:
The virtual guest is Centos 5.4 based with dovecot 1.2.8 (at first we
also tried with the original 1.0.7 (?) dovecot shipped with Centos).
I wrote "alleged time shift" because t
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 11/30/2009 4:36 PM, Udo Rader wrote:
Recent kernels should be able to keep the VM time synced using
kvmclock clocksource...
So I'll give clocksource=acpi_pm a chance and see how it turns out ...
So for the sake of other peoples' nerves also facing th
s, inetd may be
right for you, but as soon as you have to deal with more clients, inetd
is simply bad.
and about starting ... dovecot like almost any other service can of
course also be started automatically without using inetd using the usual
init scripts (depending on the unix flavour you are
ns as possible (eg. in the wiki),
maybe organized
as some kind of recipes.
In the end most setups boil down to say 4 or 5 basic types, probably differing
mostly between authentication settings.
I've upgraded our and come clients' dovecot installations multiple times, and
to be honest I did not like the extensive documentation provided in the default
configuration files. Saying 'I did not like it' does not mean that the
information
was useless, on the contrary, the amount was just overwhelming ...
Sometimes too much information is ... too much :-)
Major drawback for sample configurations is that they need to be
maintained in order to keep up with the latest and greatest settings.
But talking about documentation, what I really miss are manual or info
pages for dovecot/dovecot.conf but of course, somebody has to write
them ...
--
Udo Rader
bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
http://www.bestsolution.at
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
unning might cause some mails getting in before your user has
been correctly "initialized".
--
Udo Rader
bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
http://www.bestsolution.at
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
: 432
user: postfix
group: postfix
Any ideas welcome :-)
--
Udo Rader
bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
http://www.bestsolution.at
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
.
> >
>
>
> Duplex mismatch on the network card?
grr, yes!!! Checking the link status of the NIC it showed
that indeed duplexing was giving wrong results. Forcing it into the
correct mode did not change anything, but finally replacing the card
with a new one solved t
23 matches
Mail list logo
