.
Regards,
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
those files to
the sql subdir and apply the part of my patch that loads the modules. There's
simply no code in dovecot-auth that would load the modules.
Regards,
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
Hi,
a new version of the sql split patch attached, should be smaller, cleaner,
better.
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
--- dovecot-1.0.rc32/src/dict/main.c.split 2007-02-22 15:32:11.0
+0100
+++ dovecot-1.0.rc32/src/dict/main.c2007-04-13 13:56:55.0 +0200
put it into FC6 within a
few days. ;)
Regards,
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:02:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I committed a modified version of this to v1.1 tree. It's now enabled
> with --with-sql=plugin.
>
> I also added --with-ldap=plugin and --with-gssapi=plugin.
Great, thanks!
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
yrus-bugs is (or at least seems to be) a black hole.
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Ken Murchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> directly.
Regards,
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221572
[154314] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=154314
> passdb:
> driver: pam
> userdb:
> driver: passwd
Please, try to use userdb ldap in dovecot.conf. That way you don't use
nss_ldap, which is buggy.
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
dovecot: imap-login: imap-login: error while loading
> shared libraries: libsepol.so.1: failed to map segment from shared object:
> Cannot allocate memory
I think this is it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253363#c2
Regards,
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
scriptors, I'm still not sure what the true root
> [...]
>
> Auth config:
> auth_userdb = passwd
> auth_passdb = pam
> [...]
Do you use LDAP or just local passwd?
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
ke it arch-dependent or
something?
Regards,
--
Tomas Janousek, SW Engineer, Red Hat, Inc.
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 08:12:43PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 17:56 +0100, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> > Shall we just increase login_process_size or make it arch-dependent or
> > something?
>
> Let's just increase the default to 64MB.
Ok
11 matches
Mail list logo