Re: [Dovecot] deliver vs lda

2009-04-07 Thread Tom Metro
Timo Sirainen wrote: deliver is the binary name. a) deliver binary, protocol deliver {} The problem I have with the deliver name in general is that there is a pre-existing LDA project[1] with the same name, and even within the scope of the Dovecot mailing list, it isn't a unique term, so it

Re: [Dovecot] deliver vs lda

2009-04-08 Thread Tom Metro
Daniel L. Miller wrote: "deliver" has nothing to do with the listening daemons. So having the "lda" configuration in the dovecot.conf file might be inappropriate - I would suggest splitting that off to a "dovecot-lda.conf" file (or whatever you change the delivery agent name to). I found the

Re: [Dovecot] different auth config for LDA

2009-04-08 Thread Tom Metro
Timo Sirainen wrote: deliver doesn't use base_dir at all. Hmmm...looks like it came about due to needing a different authentication configuration between IMAP and deliver, which led to a different auth process and necessitated a separate base_dir. The two run directories are clearly differen

[Dovecot] Dovecot LDA and address extensions

2007-05-23 Thread Tom Metro
I'm converting over a virtual user installation that used Postfix and maildrop with a MySQL back-end for mailbox lookups to use Dovecot LDA. The maildrop setup used a database table like: +-++-++ | address | owner