[Dovecot] 1.2.11 logging with TLS

thing that appears is Aborted login (no auth attempts): rip=192.168.1.21, lip=192.168.1.20 when activating tls in thunderbird everything works fine. is there a way getting more verbose failures on this? do i miss something? Thanks in advance Sven

Re: [Dovecot] Virusscanning

this point. Greets, Sven

Re: [Dovecot] Virusscanning

ekly scans of the whole filesystem are usefull anyway. Or some dovecot filter plugin. Sven

[Dovecot] manipulating mails

s/ports. Last question: Is it possible to add some received-tag to a mail-header when appending mails via imap to the mailbox? Can anyone turn my head in the desired direction? Thanks in advance Sven

Re: [Dovecot] manipulating mails

to know what kind of modifications you want to do. for the moment i want to delete mails from dovecots maildir. but i am looking for a general way for automate mail processing with perl. not shure yet to what this will lead sven

Re: [Dovecot] manipulating mails

Marcus Rueckert schrieb: On 2010-04-15 19:01:39 +0200, Sven wrote: Marcus Rueckert schrieb: my thought would be: make it like amavis ... 1. your mta forwards you the mail via smtp. 2. you munch the email (although i seriously wonder why) 3. you send it back to your mta via smtp 4. mta

Re: [Dovecot] manipulating mails

Thanks a lot, Steffen. Sounds like some work. Catch your free beer(s) if you touch Frankfurt. Sven Steffen Kaiser schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Sven wrote: i want to move mails from some specific imap folder to some other folder on the

[Dovecot] user lookups not working when using dovecot as lda

n/dovecot/auth-client mode = 0660 } } } plugin { } Any help is appreciated as I dont know where to look for my mistake. regards, Sven

Re: 52.184.164.73 in my logs

daniel_1...@protonmail.com wrote: > Could it be that the outlook app uses microsoft's servers to fetch the > mail before handing them to the user ? Yes, this is the case. Have a little web search for "microsoft outlook app security risk" to see the implications. Grüße, Sve

Re: History mails are stored in the tmp/ directory

. You may want to check if the contents of the file are equivalent to any other mail in the Maildir in question or manually move the file to cur/ on your own, to make the mail visible to the user. If you have many files in tmp/ then something is wrong with you system or storage and you need to investigate this, since this is absolutely not normal. Grüße, Sven.

Re: Submission proxy warning connecting to Exim

This was added to the default feature set of Exim with 4.93 as implementation of https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-harris-early-pipe-01.txt Grüße, Sven. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Shared folders using mbox format

if you need to be compatible with anything accessing the mail other than Dovecot or better yet, use Dovecots own sdbox format. Grüße, Sven. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Shared folders using mbox format

;re still using mbox is for historical reasons - > these mailboxes are decades old. > > Should I investigate an mbox2maildir conversion? Can I be sure it will > do it properly? Dovecot can do the conversion itself, there is documentation in the Wiki about this, for example https://w

Re: Procmail with Dovecot

cmail) to work and a user can easily create loops or break their mail reception completely. Sieve at least makes sure the syntax is correct before installing a ruleset. Grüße, Sven. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Using NFS to extend local email storage

But jerry-rigging an NFS share on a flaky box over a WAN link is such a bad idea. Please, reconsider. Grüße, Sven.

Re: disable pop3 ports?

] #dovecot expects separate IPv4 and IPv6 sockets BindIPv6Only=ipv6-only ListenStream=0.0.0.0:993 ListenStream=[::]:993 KeepAlive=true [Install] WantedBy=sockets.target --- snip --- best, Sven Am 04.05.2021 um 12:14 schrieb Aki Tuomi: On 04/05/2021 12:40 Dan Egli wrote: On 5/4/2021 3:18 AM

Re: Logging to remote server

send the logs to the remote server. Dovecot itself has no facility to do this on its own. Grüße, Sven.

Re: tls_early_post_process_client_hello:unsupported protocol

internettl.org which has the following blurp on its website: "The InterneTTL is a research project that identifies servers on the Internet. InterneTTL continuously scans every host on the Internet providing IT and security teams with realtime visibility into active servers.&qu

Re: a question about certificates from letsencrypt

h-browsers-and-operating-systems-support-lets-encrypt/4394?u=mrtux for a fuller list and feel free to report more working or not working clients, I'll add them there. MTAs usually don't validate the certificates, so there should be no problem. -- Best regards, Sven Strickroth PGP key id F5A9D4C4 @ any key-server

Re: Dovecot + SAN with dedup+compression

s. (I suspect this is because of the layout of the mails inside mdbox on disk.) If you really need to deduplicate, then use the builtin SIS from Dovecot. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Lmtp Fatal Error

lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f547f286b45] -> dovecot/lmtp(+0x53ae) [0x7f548009f3ae] Normal Mails are not deliverd but filterd mails are deliverd. System is Debian 8.6 Dovecot Core is 2%3a2.3.0-alpha0-1-auto+385 AMD64 can anyone help. Sven

Re: Lmtp Fatal Error

Hi,installed 30 minutes ago and it runs again. Thank you for the great work  Sven  Von: Stephan Bosch An: dovecot@dovecot.org Gesendet: 19:04 Mittwoch, 19.Oktober 2016 Betreff: Re: Lmtp Fatal Error Op 19-10-2016 om 13:34 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Stephan Bosch : >>

doveadm stats top crash

e0e6ad0657] -> doveadm(main+0x1e4) [0x7fe0e6ab07c4] -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7fe0e5a3db45] -> doveadm(+0x1aba8) [0x7fe0e6ab0ba8] Aborted Sven

Re: mail-trends+Dovecot

]" from the list of mailboxes to avoid duplicate messages. The error happens because you don't have such a folder in your account. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Crash in 2.2.27 while moving a mail

Hi, I just noticed a crash in Dovecot (2.2.27) on Debian with the Debian version 1:2.2.27-2~bpo8+1: Jan 28 07:50:42 srv1 dovecot: imap(y...@xxx.de): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line 2170 (mailbox_save_context_reset): assertion failed: (ctx->copying_via_save) Jan 28 07:50:42 srv1 dovecot: imap(y

Mailbox suddenly inaccessible

; mailbox messages vsize INBOX/Erledigt2 15 25868676 INBOX/Erledigt/Erledigt 4344 6107238270 INBOX 24 36081472 I'm using mdbox and see no errors in syslog from dovecot. Any ideas on what's going on and how I can recover the

Re: Mailbox suddenly inaccessible

igt/Erledigt and all other mailboxes have a subfolder named "dbox-Mails", Erledigt does not have this subfolder. How can this happen? Btw. It seems as if the INBOX/Erledigt/Erledigt folder contains all the mails from the now inaccessible INBOX/Erledigt folder. -- Best regards, Sven St

Re: dovecot 2.2.28 password auth with openldap

don't need to care if the LDAP server can understand the format. But by doing so the LDAP server can no longer authenticate the user itself. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: socketpair failed: Too many open files on Debian 9

lem. Attention: Do *NOT* follow anyone advising you to copy the whole systemd.unit from /lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service to /etc/systemd/system, as this will/may break your system after an update to a new Debian version in the future. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

mdbox: purge only if it's worthwhile

s a feature request. Best, Sven PS: From the docs it's unclear to me how the mdbox rotating algorithm works. Is only to the latest mdbox file appended or it is possible that a small mail might be appended to an older mdbox file?

Systemd and listen restriction to localhost not enforced

52:14 srv1 dovecot: master: Error: systemd listens on port 143, but it's not configured in Dovecot. Closing. -- Best regards, Sven Strickroth PGP key id F5A9D4C4 @ any key-server

Re: Ubuntu packages

script will break the packages for everybody not using systemd. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Ubuntu packages

roblems, mainly because it seems to interfere with systemctl enable > command which gets confused. It does? How? If your unit and the init-script are named the same, everything should work as expected. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

n provide some numbers. I did a test with a server for about 10.000 users and 2TB worth of mail, converting from Maildir++ to mdbox with zlib (level = 6) and had a final size of 1TB, so 2:1 reduction. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

g: cost more to scale) than CPU power. And gzip (or lz4 of implemented someday) (or even blosc: http://www.blosc.org/. They claim "Designed to transmit data to the processor cache faster than a memcpy() OS call.") is effectively free with todays CPUs. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: overview zlib efficiency?

Teemu Huovila wrote: > On 15.03.2016 21:45, Sven Hartge wrote: >> And gzip (or lz4 of implemented someday) (or even blosc: > liblz4 has been supported since 2.2.11+ http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib Hmm, yes. I don't know how I missed this when I looked at that page last

Re: Migrating to dovecot from gmail apps

mick.crane wrote: > On Mon, March 28, 2016 4:13 pm, mj wrote: *Is there currently a good webmail interface to dovecot, > squirrelmail Squirrelmail is dead. S! -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: Dovecot-LMTP and LDAP: passdb doesn't support credential lookups

Class=gifb-role))) pass_attrs = uid=user,userPassword=password pass_filter = (&(objectClass=gifb-mailperson)(ou=SomeLocation)(gifb-status=1)(uid=%n)(!(objectClass=gifb-role))) iterate_attrs = uid=user iterate_filter = (&(objectClass=gifb-mailperson)(ou=SomeLocation)) Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Update Kills Dovecot

the errors is from update to dovecot-lmtpd_2%3a2.3.0~alpha0-1~auto+67_amd64.deb on debian 8.3on the morning it came an update to debian 8.4 an dovecot dovecot-lmtpd_2%3a2.3.0~alpha0-1~auto+78_amd64.deb can anyone help Sorry for my english. Sven  

Unknow Imap Fatal Panic

Hello, when i sync an Mailbox from old Dovecot to the new Dovecot System the new dovecot Imap create an Fatal/Panic log. Error Log <5Je8ahM17oSwCVUI>: Fatal: master: service(imap): child 4670 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled) : Panic: file mail-index-transaction-update.c: line 803 (ma

Re: [Dovecot] mail spool filesystem

ver ext3 (with dir_index of course). Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas with Maildir and mdbox

the runtime information about the message count and the current size is a very very bad idea. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] LDAP expired password

rpalmarin wrote: > Sven Hartge svenhartge.de> writes: >> Nikolaos Milas noa.gr> wrote: >>> On 1/4/2011 11:09 πμ, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>> Have a look at the ppolicy slapd.overlay. This will solve your >>>> problem. > Sorry for the dela

Re: [Dovecot] LDAP Authentication - Home Directory Creation

erver) and every mail is owned by your virtual mail user. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] LDAP Authentication - Home Directory Creation

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 2.12.2011, at 0.41, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Or switch to a virtual setup, where the users don't get real users on >> the imap server (they can't log in, so they don't need any real user >> on that server) and every mail is owned by yo

Re: [Dovecot] LDAP Authentication - Home Directory Creation

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 2.12.2011, at 1.03, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> I hope some day there won't be any problems with Dovecot using >>> multiple UIDs. >> >> Meaning? > There are different problems with multiple UIDs that a

Re: [Dovecot] crashes on 2.0.16

from Debian Stable and based on the Long-Term-Release from the kernel maintainers. Besides, from the suffix i assume this may be a virtual server, so it may be not possible for Cor to even change the kernel himself. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

[Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

backend storage server, so each user has potential access to a shared folders data. Ideas? Suggestions? Nudges in the right direction? Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Stan Hoeppner wrote: > It's highly likely your problems can be solved without the drastic > architecture change, and new problems it will introduce, that you > describe below. The main reason is I need to replace the hardware as its service contract ends this year and I am not able to extend it

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 1/7/2012 7:55 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> >>> It's highly likely your problems can be solved without the drastic >>> architecture change, and new problems it will introduce, that you >>> describe bel

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Sven Hartge wrote: > Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> If an individual VMware node don't have sufficient RAM you could build a >> VM based Dovecot cluster, run these two VMs on separate nodes, and thin >> out the other VMs allowed to run on these nodes. Since you can't

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Sven Hartge wrote: > Sven Hartge wrote: >> Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> If an individual VMware node don't have sufficient RAM you could build a >>> VM based Dovecot cluster, run these two VMs on separate nodes, and thin >>> out the other VMs allowe

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 1/8/2012 9:39 AM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Memory size. I am a bit hesistant to deploy a VM with 16GB of RAM. My >> cluster nodes each have 48GB, so no problem on this side though. > Shouldn't be a problem if you're going to spread the load

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 1/8/2012 3:07 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Ah, I forgot: I _already_ have the mechanisms in place to statically >> redirect/route accesses for users to different backends, since some >> of the users are already redirected to a different mailsystem at &

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 1/8/2012 2:15 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Wouldn't such a setup be the "Best of Both Worlds"? Having the main >> traffic going to local disks (being RDMs) and also being able to provide >> shared folders to every user who needs them wit

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just >> the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the >> shared folder filesystem to each backend storage server

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

hoping the impact will be minimal. Only testing will tell. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just >> the shared folders on it and using NFS (or a cluster FS) to mount the >> shared folder filesystem to each backend storage server

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 9.1.2012, at 20.25, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 8.1.2012, at 0.20, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>> Right now, I am pondering with using an additional server with just >>>> the shared folders on it and using NFS

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 9.1.2012, at 20.47, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>> Can "mmap_disable = yes" and the other NFS options be set per >>>> namespace or only globally? >> >>> Currently only globally. >> >> Ah, too bad. >> &g

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 9.1.2012, at 21.31, Sven Hartge wrote: >> , >> | # User's private mail location >> | mail_location = mdbox:~/mdbox >> | >> | # When creating any namespaces, you must also have a private namespace: >> | namesp

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>> | location = imapc:~/imapc-shared >> >> What is the syntax of this location? What does "imapc-shared" do in this >> case? > It's the directory for index files. The back

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 9.1.2012, at 22.13, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Timo Sirainen wrote: >>> On 9.1.2012, at 21.45, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>>>> | location = imapc:~/imapc-shared >>>> >>>> What is the syntax of this location? Wha

Re: [Dovecot] Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers

Sven Hartge wrote: > I am currently in the planning stage for a "new and improved" mail > system at my university. OK, executive summary of the design ideas so far: - deployment of X (starting with 4, but easily scalable) virtual servers on VMware ESX - storage will be ba

Re: [Dovecot] user login on behalf of another user

rog7...@web.de wrote: > User "user1" and "user2" shall get access to the mailbox "info". We > define the accounts "info~user1" and "info~user2" with the same home > directory like "info". Isn't this the kind of scenario

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot altmove questions

the load on your mail systems and speed up the backup operation at the same time. But you have to use "accurate" type backups, or your virtual full backup will grow and grow and grow, since Bacula without "accurate" is unable to know about deleted files and will include them in ev

Re: [Dovecot] Multiple locations, 2 servers - planning questions...

tive during the daytime) shows a steady amount of roughly 5MBit/s with peaks to 10MBit/s in and out. Remember: your outgoing bandwidth will be roughly the bandwidth of mail going into the server. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Creating an IMAP repo for ~100 users need some advice

directory. Some, like mbox or mdbox are a little bit more complex, but with the correct doveadm command you are nevertheless able to restore single mails. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Creating an IMAP repo for ~100 users need some advice

Kaya Saman wrote: > On 03/17/2012 07:36 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Kaya Saman wrote: >>> I am currently in the process of setting up an IMAP repository for >>> round 100 users Currently the user authentication method is >>> being handled via a Windows

Re: [Dovecot] Creating an IMAP repo for ~100 users need some advice

evil or bad or slow per se, but you have to use them the right way. > However, if like you say mdbox is the way to go then I will put a > strong case together! You may want to start with something familiar and convert later, which is no problem with dovecot. Grüße, Sven -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Creating an IMAP repo for ~100 users need some advice

ion/MailFormat Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Creating an IMAP repo for ~100 users need some advice

rding addresses, address book data, bookmarks, etc. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Creating an IMAP repo for ~100 users need some advice

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 18.3.2012, at 0.28, Sven Hartge wrote: >> mbox has big problems with concurrent writes, the bigger the mbox is, >> the more problems you get. This is mainly caused by the meta-data of >> a message (meaning flags, status, etc.) which is stored in

Re: [Dovecot] Berkeley DB with Dovecot

discussed here, where the database is used as a data storage for the configuration which is mostly read. So the question, how fast SQLite is during read operations compared to BDB is still unanswered. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

[Dovecot] How to copy Spammail for learning out of Postfix and Dovecot (vmail)

Hi! I am using Postfix 2.3.8 and Dovecot 1.0.rc15. Virtual Domains and Mailboxes are configured. I tried to copy spammy Mail with Procmail, but Procmail only sees local mails. How to configure it to get a copy of spammy mails in a mbox or mail-dir?

Re: [Dovecot] How to copy Spammail for learning out of Postfix and Dovecot (vmail)

Wolfram Schlich schrieb: Put them in a dedicated mail folder (mbox or maildir doesn't matter) and process them either periodically via a cron job or on-demand via inotify-enabled software. All mails are revieved by POP. No user can sort mails by Spam

Re: [Dovecot] How to copy Spammail for learning out of Postfix and Dovecot (vmail)

Nikolay Shopik schrieb: You may even do this without procmail I'm using postfix only for such job. But in my case I'm using spamtrap addresses and alias it to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] where mx1 is postfix server itself and its responsible for delivering to maildir but not to @example.co

[Dovecot] PATCH: compile dovecot-1.1.beta14 with gcc 2.95

evant. Cheers, Sven -- http://sven.anderson.de"Believe those who are seeking the truth. tel:+49-551-9969285 Doubt those who find it." mobile: +49-179-4939223 (André Gide) diff -ru dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/macros.h dovecot-1.1.beta13.patched/s

Re: [Dovecot] Follow-up re: gcc 2.96 - Re: PATCH: compile dovecot-1.1.beta14 with gcc 2.95

This is included in my patch already, but Timo didn't want to commit it, since [0] is gcc specific, and [] is C99 standard. Kevin A. McGrail schrieb: > As a follow-up on this, these two lines also helped me to compile the > 1.1rc1 on gcc 2.96: > > diff -ru dovecot-1.1.beta13/src/lib/str-find.c >

Re: [Dovecot] Follow-up re: gcc 2.96 - Re: PATCH: compile dovecot-1.1.beta14 with gcc 2.95

Am 27.02.2008 um 15:31 schrieb Timo Sirainen: Why are you people still using so old gcc versions? I guess I could accept a patch something like: I'm using an old custom-made vserver system, and it's running fine, so why spend a lot of time to migrate to a newer distributi

[Dovecot] Sieve doesnt filter

Hi! I have a config like this (globalsieverc): require "fileinto"; if address :domain :is "to" "domain.de" { if header :matches "X-Spam-Level" "\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*\\*" { #discard; fileinto "spamdir"; } } else { # The rest goes into INBOX # default i

Re: [Dovecot] Sieve doesnt filter

Steffen Kaiser schrieb: I guess, this is just a simplification of you real filter, therefore one remard: keep is not reached, if address matches, but header not. The regex does not look correct, use just one backslash per asterisk. BTW: I would use header :contains "X-Spam-Level" "

[Dovecot] How to log login errors?

Hi! I used "auth_debug=yes" and "auth_debug_passwords=yes". But I only see connects and disconnects: Apr 11 09:17:43 dovecot: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Disconnected: Logged out top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/0, size=0 Apr 11 09:17:43 dovecot: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Disconnected: Logged out top=0/0,

[Dovecot] Case sensitve problem

Hi! I am using Postfix, Mysql and Dovecot 1.0.rc15. It seems that Dovecot creates new mailboxes for eg. [EMAIL PROTECTED] althoug in the name in databse is [EMAIL PROTECTED] ny logging in pop3. How to solve this problem?

Re: [Dovecot] Case sensitve problem

Charles Marcus schrieb: On 7/24/2008, Sven Schmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Dovecot 1.0.rc15. I see your specific issue was answered, but it is also highly recommended that you upgrade... this is a VERY old, RC version (in a release that had over 30 (thirty) release candidates)... In

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot load balancing

:0 w | $DELIVER Works like a charm. Kind regards Sven

[Dovecot] Connection queue full on dovecot 1.1.14 and 1.1.15

ersion 1.1.14 and 1.1.15 and I guess also in earlier versions. Thanks in advance! Best regards, Sven

Re: [Dovecot] Connection queue full on dovecot 1.1.14 and 1.1.15

Am 28.05.2009 um 09:36 schrieb Sven Eulberg: Hello, sometimes we get the following errors on out dovecot proxies: dovecot: May 27 20:06:10 Info: imap-login: Disconnected: Connection queue full (no auth attempts): REMOTE= LOCAL= TLS handshaking dovecot: May 27 20:06:10 Info: imap-login

[Dovecot] Log filenames of saved files to inbox by dovecot-deliver

Hello, Is it possible to log the filenames into deliver.log where dovecot- deliver saved incoming emails? If not so, please add this as a feature request. Thanks in advance! Regards, Sven

Re: [Dovecot] SSD drives are really fast running Dovecot

96KiB. Last year, this average was at 77KiB and in 2009 we were at 62KiB. Mails the average size of 4KiB would then have been at a time when MIME was not yet invented, I believe. Somewhere in 1994. Grüße, Sven. -- Sig lost. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] SSD drives are really fast running Dovecot

Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > Sven Hartge wrote: >> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: >>> Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>>> [...] The average size of an email worldwide today is less than >>>> 4KB, less than one typical filesystem block. [...] >> >>>

Re: [Dovecot] Questiosn about dbox

ng any sense here? Problem: I my end up with hundred thousands of m.* files inside a users storage area (Don't ask, we really have this kind of user. And no, there are uneducable about this.), even if the user neatly sorted them into different IMAP folders. So, right now I have got the feeling, I am missing something important here. Comments? Grüße, Sven. -- Sig lost. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Questiosn about dbox

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 24.1.2011, at 23.17, Sven Hartge wrote: >> I take this thread and jump in, since we (TH Mittelhessen, Germany) are >> also investigating the move to Dovecot and we also have the same >> situation as Javier: Courier with Maildir and Bacula as backup

Re: [Dovecot] Questiosn about dbox

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 25.1.2011, at 0.11, Sven Hartge wrote: >>> Yes, but if you use mdbox_rotate_interval=1d and run the purging >>> before backups, I think there's a good chance that most of the >>> backed up mails will be new files that bacula hasn

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2010 IMAP disconnected

Luigi Rosa wrote: > Disconnected for inactivity. >Protocollo: IMAP >Server: mail.xxx >Porta: 143 >Codice errore: 0x800CCCDD Have a look at . Grüße, S° -- Si

[Dovecot] Quotas from LDAP

attributes used and what does %$ mean? It is not in the variable list at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Variables I am feeling very stupid and dense right now, as I am absolutely sure I am missing something very obvious and totally simple. Grüße, Sven. -- Sig lost. Core dumped.

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas from LDAP

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.2.2011, at 0.17, Sven Hartge wrote: >> user_attrs = homeDirectory=home,quotaBytes=quota_rule=*:bytes=%$ >> >> get the quota from LDAP into dovecot? What are the LDAP attributes used > quotaBytes is the LDAP attribute name which contains

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas from LDAP

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.2.2011, at 0.38, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>> and what does %$ mean? >> >>> It's the value of quotaBytes LDAP attribute. So the idea is that you >>> have: >> >>> ldap-attribute-name=dovecot-setting-name=dove

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas from LDAP

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 23.2.2011, at 1.27, Sven Hartge wrote: >>>> So, %$ ist always the value of the referenced attribute? What if >>>> there are multiple values, by accident or by design? >> >>> Won't work right now. >> >> Wil

Re: [Dovecot] Quotas from LDAP

Joseba Torre wrote: > On Wednesday 23 February 2011 00:55:05 Sven Hartge wrote: >> Given the following object: >> >> dn: uid=foo,ou=bar >> quotaBytes: 1 >> quotaBytes: 1000 > As I see it, this is a desigh error; quotaBytes should be a single

  1   2   3   >