Hello folks,
I have a problem with replication and mail_location with LAYOUT=fs set.
If I set "mail_location = maildir:~/mail" (leaving out the :LAYOUT=fs),
create and populate some mailboxes and subfolders, they all get
replicated. If I start with a clean mail spool and LAYOUT=fs, I can
create s
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 04:59 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 11:39 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I have a problem with replication and mail_location with LAYOUT=fs set.
> >
> > If I set "mail_location = maild
I am running dovecot 2.2.2 with tcp based replication, and experiencing
some duplicated emails. `doveconf -n` output is below.
I have narrowed it down to the following scenario:
An email arrives, and is successfully replicated to both nodes. It is in
INBOX/new/ at this point on both servers.
C
+0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> I am running dovecot 2.2.2 with tcp based replication, and experiencing
> some duplicated emails. `doveconf -n` output is below.
>
> I have narrowed it down to the following scenario:
>
> An email arrives, and is successfully replicated to both nodes. I
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 17:47 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.07.2013 17:41, schrieb Simon Fraser:
> > I've just converted the mailboxes to mdbox, so mail_location now looks
> > like this:
> >
> > mail_location = mdbox:~/mail
> >
> > The
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 20:26 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Version 2.2.2 is not current any more. I would try to update to the
> latest stable version 2.2.4 first, since some dsync bugs have been
> fixed between 2.2.2 and 2.2.4:
I've now upgraded to 2.2.4 (and pigeonhole 0.4.1 from
Hi, is there anything I can do to help debug this - any tools I should
run to discover where the cause might be?
Simon.
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:05 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 20:26 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Version 2.2.2 is
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 15:09 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:28 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
>
> > I am running dovecot 2.2.2 with tcp based replication, and experiencing
> > some duplicated emails. `doveconf -n` output is below.
>
> Are both of th
Hello,
For what it's worth, still experiencing these symptoms with 2.2.5.
Thanks,
Simon.
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 15:02 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 15:09 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:28 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> >
> &
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:30 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Here's another idea:
>
Thank you for still looking into this
> Try disabling replicator plugin from only one side, so there's not
> possibility of two dsyncs running at the same time. That should be prevented
> already by locking thoug
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 16:45 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > Weird, I was sure that would have worked. Well, maybe rawlogs would
> show something interesting. I should probably add a proper option for
> them, but attached a patch to enable for now. Be sure to
> mkdir /tmp/dsync-rawlogs with en
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:15 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Presumably it's thinking the "-r /tmp/dsync-rawlog" is a mail location?
> > I've tried changing its location in the appends, but it doesn't make a
> > difference.
>
> Oops, I messed up the parameter order. It was supposed to have -s sta
Are there any more tests I can run for this?
Thanks,
Simon.
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 09:21 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:15 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > > Presumably it's thinking the "-r /tmp/dsync-rawlog" is a mail location?
> >
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 12:08 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> Are there any more tests I can run for this?
I've tried an ssh-based replication configuration, and still experience
the same symptoms. Going through a director proxy also doesn't help (as
expected, that one, since I was
ure
Director is enabled. Are there any things to watch for surrounding
this?
Simon.
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 09:49 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 12:08 +0100, Simon Fraser wrote:
> > Are there any more tests I can run for this?
>
> I've tried an ssh-based r
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 00:13 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > One side has uidnext=23 and the other side has uidnext=24. You're
> deleting the last message with uid=22, so the uidnext=23 is correct.
> The other side however thinks that the same mail's uid is 23. There
> must be something wrong with
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 01:10:04AM -0700, Eric Broch wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 7:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >
> > (And as for the original question: I’ll make v2.2.9 this weekend. And as
> > for bugs, as I already once mentioned, I’m planning on implementing
> > significantly more comprehensive te
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:58 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Question 2a: What do options "-d -N -l 30 -U" signify in
> "replication_dsync_parameters = -d -N -l 30 -U"?
I'd also be interested to know the answer to this part. I found mention
of the '-f' option, and adding '-f' to that list appears
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 15:34 +0300, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> -d Use a default location for the replica. As far as I can tell this is
> obtained from userdb variable mail_replica.
> -N Sync all (visible?) namespaces (only makes sense when syncing with a
> remote host, with potentially different name
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 15:41 +0300, Teemu Huovila wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 04/04/2014 03:38 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> > It does help, thank you. Do you also know what the '-f' option does?
> According to the dsync-man page it:
>
> Makes dsync run in "full sync
On 16/12/14 16:30, Matthias Egger wrote:
What happened:
A few weeks ago one of the LDAPS Servers which is not maintained by us
has crashed. From that moment on, users could still login to check their
emails, but they were not able to send any email through postfix (which
uses smtpd_sasl_type =
21 matches
Mail list logo
