Any Idea on this one?
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> 100% reproducible. User is using alpine to write an email.
>
> Continue postponed composition (answering "No" won't erase it)?
> y -> [>Empty folder! No messages really postponed!<]
> Can't delete
&
We're proxying IMAP to an Exchange server. One of my colleagues is
getting this when trying to save a message as "Draft" OR as "Sent
items":
Aug 25 13:45:41 mproxy dovecot: imap(froemmel): Error:
imapc(exchange-imap.charite.de:993): Command '7 APPEND "Entw&APw-rfe" (\Draft)
{232572}' timed out,
We're using dovecot as a proxy between the user and an exchange
server. All over a sudden we're getting:
Aug 27 13:16:07 mproxy dovecot: imap(username): Fatal: master: service(imap):
child 18376 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled)
Aug 27 13:16:09 mproxy dovecot: imap(username): Error:
ima
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox#Alternate_storage
lists
mail_location = mdbox:/var/vmail/%d/%n:ALT=/altstorage/vmail/%d/%n
But can I have multiple ALT= locations? Background: I want to migrate
to a hashing-scheme!
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstra
Currently, I'm using
mail_location = mdbox:/var/spool/mail/%Ld/%Ln/mdbox
Now I want to add a partitioning (so I don'T have all directories in
one single directory), but can't find the right syntax:
mail_location = mdbox:/var/spool/mail/%Ld//%Ln/mdbox
It seems like I'd need to use
%N (new hash)
* Sven Hartge :
> I have home=/srv/mail/%2NLn/%2.16NLn/%Ln/ in my auth-ldap.conf.ext and
> this gives me a path like this: /srv/mail/0/08/myusername
>
> I use version 2.2.13 of dovecot.
I'm on 2.1.17 :(
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
How exactly is LMTP proxying supposed to work?
According to the example on
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy
I'm only seeing "proxy" in the password_query statements.
But LMTP never sends a password.
IMAP Proxying is working OK:
Sep 24 12:51:09 imap-login: Info: prox
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> How exactly is LMTP proxying supposed to work?
>
> According to the example on
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy
>
> I'm only seeing "proxy" in the password_query statements.
Found that one, LMTP needs to u
* Peer Heinlein :
>
> Using doveadm penalty I just noticed a penalty for 0.0.0.0.
>
> Is this Postfix querying the auth-socket for his SASL-requests?
Maybe a portscan? Sometimes they turn up as 0.0.0.0
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
S
I'm getting this in the log when proxying IMAP (three "valid
certificate" messages, two "Invalid certificate" messages)
Why is dovecot (acting as a proxy to another dovecot instance here) not
recognizing the StartCom Extended Validation Server CA?
. LOGIN ralf.hildebra...@charite.de mypassword
Se
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de :
>
> Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
>
> >I'm getting this in the log when proxying IMAP (three "valid
> >certificate" messages, two "Invalid certificate" messages)
> >
> >Why is dovecot (acting as a proxy to anot
I want to migrate from a non-hashed storage to a hashed storage.
So I set this up:
mail_location = mdbox:/srv/vmail/%2.256Hu/%Lu/mdbox:ALT=/srv/vmail/%Ld/%Ln/mdbox
I rsynced the "old" mdbox-style mailbox from another machine to to
/srv/vmail/%Ld/%Ln/mdbox
(/srv/vmail/charite.de/ralf.hildebrandt/
Currently I'm using
user_query = SELECT 1000 AS uid, 1000 AS gid, '/srv/vmail/%2.256Hu/%Lu' AS
home, ...
so I'm hashing based on %u (basically). But in my SQL db I have a
"unique_identifier" field, which never changes, even when the user is
changing his/her email address (due to marriage or the l
We're using keywords within Thunderbird, and we're syncing those using
IMAP. When using more than 5 keywords, we're envcountering problems -
they're only partially being synced (between two clients, but not all
clients).
Any idea why this could be happening?
The introduction of tagging in Thunde
We're proxying using 2.2.14~rc1 (on our IMAP Proxy) to two dovecot
backend servers running dovecot-2.2.13-r1
When we're using Thundebird to connect to the dovecot proxy, we're
getting the message "The mail server for account ACCOUNTNAME
responded: [COMPRESSIONACTIVE] TLS compression already enable
After fixing the "duplicate compression" problem, we're now
encountering
"imap-login: Error: proxy(USERNAME): connect(10.x.x.178, 993) failed: Cannot
assign requested address (after 0 secs, local=10.x.x.100)"
in the logs. We already tried raising the ulimit, the max number of
open files. Once w
> > in the logs. We already tried raising the ulimit, the max number of
> > open files. Once we reach about 25k connections, we're getting the
> > error above... for all local addresses. It seems as if the system
> > cannot create any more outgoing connections.
>
> I'd guess you're running out of
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > I'd guess you're running out of TCP ports.
>
> I think so too, but it's somewhat unlikely! We're using 10 outbound IP
> adresses! In a random fashion (and I'm seeing this on the backend
> server!)
FYI: It was a kernel bug.
-
> >FYI: It was a kernel bug.
>
> Do you mind sharing the actual technical background. Which kernel
> was affected and how?
We didn't track it down to a specific bug, but we finally decided that
our setup using multiple IPs for source and destination was OK and
should work as intended - but it did
* brd :
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> [...]
> > We already optimized:
> > snip
> > net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout=5
> > # down from 30s
> > net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1
> > net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle=1
> > #
> > http://redis4you.com/articles.php?id=
I'm preparing a migration of several mailboxes to another machine.
The different useraccounts are distributed to different backend
machines by means of a dovecot LMTP/IMAP/POP proxy.
Proxying is working really well (now that the kernel does as it should).
But how can I "lock" a user during migrat
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> 2) defer LMTP delivery somehow (Postfix is talking to dovecot's LMTP server)
I could of course put a mysql: query into postfix which would return
user@domain retry:
for the "locked" user. But I'm lazy and would prefer a single place /
a single qu
* Benny Pedersen :
>
> >for the "locked" user. But I'm lazy and would prefer a single place /
> >a single query to lock the account
>
> Setup postfix to check the recipient account is active, then set a
> temp new password while move mail to the new server, when its done
> change password back to
Is there an easy way of "fixing" these?
Oct 26 13:24:52 imap(account@domain): Error: mdbox map
/var/mail/domain/account/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index corrupted:
map_uid=2700 refcount too low
(dovecot 2.1.17)
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 Mü
# doveadm force-resync -u username inbox
doveadm(username): Warning: fscking index file
/srv/vmail/04/05/14331/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index
doveadm(username): Warning: mdbox /srv/vmail/04/05/14331/mdbox/storage:
rebuilding indexes
doveadm(username): Error: Corrupted dbox file
/srv/vmail/04/0
I'm using "/usr/bin/doveadm purge -A" to purge the mdboxes of my users.
Unfortunately this command terminates prematurely once it reaches a
defective mdbox!
Is there a workaround for this?
Like using doveadm to get a list of valid users and then run "doveadm
purge -u" on each of those?
--
[*]
* Pascal Volk :
> Are you looking for a workaround like this?
>
> for user in `doveadm user \*`; do doveadm purge -u $user; done
Yeah!
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263
Vorst
We're seeing this:
% doveadm force-resync -u USERNAME INBOX
doveadm(USERNAME): Panic: file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 250
(sync_expunge_range): assertion failed: (count > 0)
doveadm(USERNAME): Error: Raw backtrace:
/usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x817ad) [0x33ab08317ad] ->
/usr/lib64/
arite.de 2.6.21.1 #1 SMP Tue May 1 15:50:11 CEST 2007 i686
GNU/Linux
OS: Debian testing
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-BerlinFax. +49 (0)30-45
removed the bogus symlink and all is well now.
> It means that Dovecot tried to some operation to a maildir
> file.
Yep.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtun
vecot for imap, imaps and
pop3s. The load dropped from 50-60 to 2 (!) during noon.
Excellent!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-BerlinFax. +49 (0
(for historical reasons (don't ask))
Dual Xeon 2.8GHz with 3GB RAM
1,8TB mailstore (ext3, external SCSI RAID)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berli
this behaviour with dovecot?
Basically, all I need is a usernamen mapping ala:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]rhilde
Ralf.Hildebrandt rhilde
for all my users -- I can generate this programatically using awk, but
how can I make dovecot use that?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zent
es
auth default:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
plugin:
quota: maildir
quota: maildir:ignore=Trash
snip ---
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame E
TECTED]:user=rhilde
for all users? How?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-BerlinFax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962
IT-Zentrum Standort CBF
14 imap-login processes.
Each of the 14 handles up to 32 auth requests.
And if I get this right, NEW imap-login processes are spawned
automatically when the need arises. Correct?
So I'm well below my limit of 128 imap-login processes.
Or do I have to count other *-login processes as well?
--
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > What passdb are you using?
>
> auth default:
> master_user_separator: *
> verbose: yes
> passdb:
> driver: passwd-file
> args: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.maste
ovecot doesn't support these kind of "pass through passdbs".
argh!
> PAM however does support internally changing the username, so it would
> be possible for you to create such a PAM module. But I can't help with
> that.
Double-argh.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL P
"Connection queue full" /var/log/pop3d-imapd.log |wc -l
104
So, 31 of 104 are TLS.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
To rephrase, spam is not
ib10_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
__stack_chk_fail_local
Error: imap dump-capability process returned 89
and the like. So: Is it possible at all?
And sorry for the blasphemy of daring to ask this in the first place :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
-protector, but I think that symbol should exist in the libssl
> > library.
>
> Uh, libssp. Why did it type it wrong two times..
So, have you tried that?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
PFAIL, which I can pass through
maildrop back to postfix, which will then log a temporary error and
will bounce the mail all by itself after 5 days time.
But how?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-
map/lib10_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
__stack_chk_fail_local
May 20 14:30:32 postamt dovecot: child 21292 (imap) returned error 89
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.a
e a recent version of GCC and *binutils*. It seems
> linker is broken.
That's not the case. It's all from debian testing and Postfix builds
perfectly with -fstack-protector.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betri
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That's not the case. It's all from debian testing and Postfix builds
> perfectly with -fstack-protector.
And it runs, too...
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But do you use any dynamically loadable modules with Postfix?
EXCELLENT point there. No :)
> You said that Dovecot works too as long as you're not using plugins..
Yes.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL P
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 18:55 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > That's not the case. It's all from debian testing and Postfix builds
> > perfectly with -fstack-protector.
>
> Just tried myself with Debian unstable and i
bc6 2.3.6.ds1-13), so it would be nice to have a
> configure test to work around an affected libc."
Argh. It works now.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
ls will bounce -- they'll
never notice that, though.
Thus I need a feature in dovecot that will tell them via email:
Level1: "You ALMOST exceeded your quota, you're at 90% now"
Level2: "You're very close to exceededin your quota, you're at 95% now"
Lev
d value for time_t,
> we returned BAD error for APPEND and SEARCH never matched. With 64bit
> systems this shouldn't have happened. With 32bit systems the valid
> range is usually for years 1902..2037.
>
> See ChangeLog for more.
When starting, dovecot rep
t; mail consume all cpu and memory. How can we avoid this kinds of things?
Use dovecot's deliver program when delivering to that mailbox. This will keep
the index up-to-date.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
sgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: save
failed to INBOX: Unknown error
Jun 18 15:37:22 postamt deliver(roxxxmy): msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Rejected:
Unknown error
This is deliver from dovecot-1.0.1
What exactly IS "Unknown error"?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Erland Nylend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Take a look at the thread "save failed to INBOX". Maybe you could
> try the same debug patches, to see whether its the same problem I'm
> having.
Will do.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Take a look at the thread "save failed to INBOX". Maybe you could
> > try the same debug patches, to see whether its the same problem I'm
> > having.
>
> Will do.
I performed a hg pull, so all these patc
/raw) and tried to apply them.
In EVERY case patch -p1 reported "previosly applied patch detected, revert?".
So WTF?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs
ourself too. Did patching remove
> i_error() lines or did it add them?
I guess you must have. I looked at
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/raw-rev/abc4be10176e
this one for exampel is in 1.0.1 already!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Bet
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ah, but there's a difference between debug patches and error logging
> improvement patches. :) By debug patches I meant those "diff"
> attachments in my mails.
ARGHGHGHGHGH.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Ah, but there's a difference between debug patches and error logging
> > improvement patches. :) By debug patches I meant those "diff"
> > attachments in my mails.
* Erland Nylend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It seems that you are using the maildir-quota also? If you are, then
> this might be the same problem I'm having.
Yes, probably.
> Timo just sent a patch:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/b919a32cd077
Yes, we both
* Erland Nylend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Also I think this should fix the problem:
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/b919a32cd077
>
> The errors are gone .. thank you :)
I don't see any more errors either.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ndles the filesystem.. Anyways, in addition to journaling,
> you get deleted file salvage, open file backup/snapshot, and easily
> expandable volumes...
Sounds like a job for ZFS :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartu
es. We tried XFS for our 9000 Users
(Maildir) and swithced back to ext3.
> All data I have right now tells me to stay ReiserFS though. Even
> Dovecot's own page says XFS may not be a wise choice.
My experience tells me to stay away from ReiserFS as well.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL
switch)...
I did the ext3 -> ext4 switch on two of our proxyservers a few months
ago. Then we forgot (!) about that test and the boxes just kept
running and running and running ...
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung
ences in performance?
No. But at least it didn't explode in my face :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
Am I advocating HTML email? No. I think it su
imply call dovecot deliver from within procmail
Problems solved.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
In the rather clear UNIX language: the TCPA cartel will be
a
11:07:06 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(vnedwed,77.128.63.72):
invalid password field
Jul 6 14:12:40 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(jechafch,141.42.4.251):
invalid password field
This is dovecot-1.0.1
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postf
aded 1.0.1 from the webpage, rebuilt and the problems
are gone.
Now I'm getting those:
Jul 12 10:33:10 postamt dovecot: IMAP(blxxe): Corrupted index cache file
/home/b/l/blxxe/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache: indexid changed
Somethin amiss with the index code?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTEC
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 11:58 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > auth-request.c:874: error: ‘const union ’ has no member
> > named ‘ip6’
>
> How did you manage to compile without IPv6? :)
Hey, I just did :)
> But thanks, fixed
[1]: Leaving directory /usr/src/dovecot'
make: *** [all] Error 2
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic.
proxy-openssl.c: line 460
(ssl_proxy_new): assertion failed: (fd != -1)
Jul 17 11:51:12 postamt dovecot: child 24406 (login) killed with signal 6
This is dovecot-1.0.2 -- is this something to worry about?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrie
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:06 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > I'm getting these in my log:
> >
> > Jul 17 11:40:42 postamt dovecot: imap-login: file ssl-proxy-openssl.c: line
> > 460 (ssl_proxy_new): assertion failed:
_max_connections: 128
Should I go higher? I have approximately 70 IMAP logins/minute on
average, but peaks of up to 140 logins/minute.
> Of course it shouldn't crash either, I'll see if I can get that fixed.
:)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any tuning I can do to improve this?
Use deliver to rebuild the index wehenever a mail is delivered.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
"The percentage of u
e that:
quota_warning = storage=10%% /usr/local/scripts/quota-warning 90
But my question is: Are multiple quota_warnings possible? How?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkr
he patch if your quota jumps between multiple warnings it'll execute
> each of the commands. With my v1.1 implementation it executes only the first
> one.
I can live with that.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb un
stamt dovecot: IMAP(hdaebrit): inotify_rm_watch() failed:
Invalid argument
should I worry? Kernel 2.6.22.1 and dovecot 1.0.x hg checkout.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> And another question: Are there ways to find out how efficient the
>> cache is?
>
> Send SIGUSR1 (or was it SIGUSR2?) to dovecot-auth and look at the logs.
SIGUSR2 -- because SIGUSR1 kills it. Aiie!
--
Ralf Hilde
no cache at all" ?
And another question: Are there ways to find out how efficient the
cache is?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
"Acting is all about honesty. If you can fake that, you've got it made."
-- George Burns
would deliver the mail on the
next queue run) -- but why is that?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
ecot-uidlist then caused the UIDVALIDITY to change, which
> causes IMAP clients to redownload all messages, and as you can see
> Dovecot doesn't handle UIDVALIDITY changes all that nicely. v1.1 does a
> better job with it though.
So, is there a way to migrate WITHOUT all my pop3
y of storing POP3 UIDLs to a
> separate field in dovecot-uidlist for v1.1, but I haven't managed to
> write that code yet.
:)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkreb
x80cde56] -> imap(main+0xb8) [0x8069cbf] ->
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0xb7dc8030] -> imap
[0x8058361]
Aug 16 16:59:38 postamt dovecot: child 11760 (imap) killed with signal 6
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, B
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 17:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Found this today multiple times for the same user:
> >
> > Aug 16 16:59:38 postamt dovecot: IMAP(username): file strfuncs.c: line 165
> > (p_strndup): assertion
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/33690bb286af probably fixes it
>
> Nope, I did a hg pull yesterday and restarted dovecot.
Maybe it worked, since I see that particular User NOT getting the
errors anymore.
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe it worked, since I see that particular User NOT getting the
> errors anymore.
Seems to be a particular folder he's accessing:
Aug 18 09:57:57 postamt dovecot: IMAP(myuser): file strfuncs.c: line 165
(p_strndup): assertion f
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 10:31 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Maybe it worked, since I see that particular User NOT getting the
> > > errors anymore.
> >
] ->
imap(io_loop_handler_run+0x191) [0x80cec60] -> imap(io_loop_run+0x20)
[0x80cdebe] -> imap(main+0xb8) [0x8069d27] ->
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0) [0xb7da9050] -> imap
[0x8058371]
Sep 9 19:50:47 postamt dovecot: child 15875 (imap) killed with signal
;ve
> attached a complete list of all dovecot log entries in maillog in the hope
> that it will help you identify the issue.
I'm under the impression that it does no harm, but I'd like to know
the reason as well.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PRO
x dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> method=PLAIN, rip=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, lip=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> Sep 21 10:53:37 cnetmbox dovecot: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Disconnected: Logged out top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/1, size=2595
Maybe the users uses "leave m
Raw backtrace: imap
> > [0x80c6dbb] -> imap(i_fatal+0) [0x80c67fd] -> imap(p_strndup+0x38)
> > [0x80d837e] -> imap(t_strndup+0x22) [0x80d873f] -> imap(cmd_create+0xb5)
> > [0x8059a29] -> imap [0x805eb65] -> imap
>
> Well, this then: http://hg.dovecot.org
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > I still get that:
> > >
> > > Sep 9 19:50:47 postamt dovecot: IMAP(lengelha): file strfuncs.c: line
> > > 165 (p_strndup): assertion failed: (max_char
2:2,a
Oct 2 13:46:12 postamt dovecot: IMAP(rb): Maildir
/home/r/b/rb/Maildir/.listen.jmol sync: UID inserted in the middle of
mailbox (571 > 570, file =
1191325571.P17909Q0M852537.postamt.charite.de,S=5674:2,)
This is dovecot 1.0.5.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PRO
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 15:38 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > One of our users seems to have strange problems with his mailbox:
> >
> > Oct 2 00:36:42 postamt dovecot: IMAP(rb): Corrupted transaction log
> > file /ho
signature to outgoing email
> (also listed in order of importance to me)
Postfix/amavisd-new
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
"I think there is a world ma
liver which in turn
invokes /usr/bin/vacation
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
Liebe ist auch nach einem Bluescreen zu behaupten es g�be keine
Alternative.
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - mbox: Fixed "file size unexpectedly shrinked" error in some
> conditions.
Shrink, shrunk, shrunk
:)
Thanks for the new version.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Ei
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 12:14 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > - mbox: Fixed "file size unexpectedly shrinked" error in some
> > > conditions.
>
* Patrick Ben Koetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ARHHGHGHGH. I suck.
>
> Go, see a shrunk. ;)
A shrunk shrink? Right now, we have to sell our Schrank (cupboard).
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wart
vecot: imap-login: Internal login failure:
user=, method=PLAIN, rip=193.175.174.239, lip=141.42.4.250, TLS
What gives?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
We
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm encountering lots of
> Oct 31 11:14:25 postamt dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files
> errors around midday ever since the latest upgrade to 1.0.7.
>
> The errors appear in pairs like this one:
> Oct 31 11:20:01 p
601 - 700 of 723 matches
Mail list logo
