it was before.
mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY
don't use this on IMAP boxes, but is safe to use on SMTP and POP3's
boxes though
eg:
mail_location =
maildir:/var/vmail/%Ld/%1Ln/%1.1Ln/%2.1Ln/%Ln/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
e RPMs, RH
v say for example Fresh, because package maintainers will package
differently.
Its like trying to stick a cisco 1800 image on an ASR9K and expecting it
to work perfectly.
Though we don't use deb or rpm based systems and haven't for about 15
years, if I was to, I think I'd
/plugins/managsieve/config.inc.php.dist to config.inc.php,
and enable the plugin in /config/config.inc.php in $config[plugins]
arrayjust like every other plugin.
done...
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privi
but it shows
it takes very little work to "document" it, your stressing for no
reason.
https://mail.ausics.net/help/add_filter0.gif
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains
use either and all your pain will go
away
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not disseminate, dis
outs set. Not waiting for infinity.
>
> This is on 2.3.3. 2.2 worked fine without needing time unit specified.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to
me that some people on mailing lists feel the
need to reply directly, rather than through mailing list.
(Yeah I know its also shortcomings of certain mailers and mailing
services (has gmail even fixed that yet) where hitting reply or reply
all should go to list. Its also dumb when list admins dont
On 02/12/2018 10:16, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On 12/01/2018 04:09 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> Which is why it annoys me that some people on mailing lists feel the need to
>> reply directly, rather than through mailing list.
>
> Sometimes it is the MUA that is poorly d
tting
1500 people ask the same damn question.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not disseminate, di
n username via dovecot.
I think Aki's playing with settings that are not quite right yet :)
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyr
one here has to do shit for you, the
fact it works for everyone else, indicates there is a problem with your
configuration and yours alone - somewhere, and because you're the only
one experiencing this, it may be harder to trace the origin of.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
On 07/12/2018 16:44, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 6.12.2018 6.54, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2018 07:29, Jakobus Schürz wrote:
>
> that all and every Flag is set, except \Seen... I tried to figure out, whats
> happening here...
>
> Paste what your sieve file contain
On 07/12/2018 17:55, Jakobus Schürz wrote:
> Am 07.12.18 um 08:10 schrieb Noel Butler:
>
> On 07/12/2018 16:44, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On 6.12.2018 6.54, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2018 07:29, Jakobus Schürz wrote:
>
> that all and every Flag is set, except
is is probably more a question for postfix users list, might explain
why noone here answered you, but no its not needed with lmtp, and 2 msgs
a second, you want see any benefit over lda unless your running on a 386
:)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain le
23:02, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-06-12 13:42, Noel Butler wrote:
off your drugs again benny?
WTF should she provide all the config outputs, when she asked a simple
question about one option, and WTF clamav came from is beyond me
this is very important AFTER i replayed to help, not BEFORE,
since logs indicate
this only occurred after updating to the point 1 release.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may
ing else at once in a
new major is perfectly acceptable, and, is the norm.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You
On 01/10/2016 08:27, Joseph Tam wrote:
we have a setup with (CentOS 6) Director+Dovecot, Maildir as storage
on
NetApp NFS v3. Every time I try to switch to NFS v4 I found issue with
lock (and others). So for me NFSv4 with Maildir is "unstable" or need
a
fine tuning that I don't know.
I foun
> [1]: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-8562
> [2]: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-856
> 2
Ups, sent wrong number, correct is CVE-2016-8652.
That is the same number, no?
No, read it again. the wrong and pasted copie are 8 5 62, his revise
s.
Just like passwd backends which we used to be able to select, now, sadly
dovecot is bloatware
I can compile an entire freaking kernel 35% faster than dovecot :)
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information
racle, MariaDB Corporation Ab and others.
Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input
statement.
MariaDB [(none)]>
If not, look into mysql db and verifiy vmail user and perms (especially
for localhost), ensure yo
hit enter too quickly (I've had one coffee all morning hehe)
On 15/08/2017 08:54, Noel Butler wrote:
> Copyright (c) 2000, 2017, Oracle, MariaDB Corporation Ab and others.
>
> Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input
&
he wrong
area, since the database stores passwords hashed, you enter it in, in
plain text, the database them does its magic to convert what you entered
in, into a hash and does the matching in its own backend, so to speak.
if you put in your dovecot sql file, the vmail password in plain text
and not
On 15/08/2017 22:23, Noel Butler wrote:
> On 15/08/2017 21:25, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
>
>> On Tue, August 15, 2017 8:03 pm, Sami Ketola wrote:
>> On 15 Aug 2017, at 2.50, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
>>
>> how do I generate hashed string from my password ?
>>
On 15/08/2017 22:58, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> On Tue, August 15, 2017 10:27 pm, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> HUH?
>> Are you trying to login to mysql using the hash itself?
>
> Noel, thanks!!
>
> oops, misunderstood instruction...
>
> this is better:
>
delete anything - til you get it sorted)
> mailbox Drafts {
> special_use = \Drafts
> }
> mailbox Junk {
> special_use = \Junk
> }
> mailbox Sent {
> special_use = \Sent
> }
> mailbox "Sent Messages" {
> special_use = \Sent
> }
> mailbox Trash {
> special
insurance level on even the
most basic of their offerings. Do your research, though if using a paid
service, since some others are soon to be un-trusted.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore
l/ closes the connection.
Thats not how maildir works you need to add the Maildir directory to it,
ie maildir:/var/spool/mail/%n/Maildir
but DO NOT USE THAT directory! And its more than dovecot you need to
change if you're going to use maildir, so just fix up your mbox
settings.
--
Kind Reg
Ahh thats it :)
He should be good now, no idea why a fedora install wouldn't have that
On 18/08/2017 19:43, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> mail_location=~/.mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%Ln
>
> Aki
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may c
replied, I dare say Aki's post helped him sort it out.
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not
stems crypt options including sha's -
providing your system is half modern, if its ten years old dont use
that, it'll be likely using the old 8 char limited crypt :) (and dont
laugh the number of antique debian and RH boxes I've come across is
scary)
anyway, so even as a fallback for t
eparate db for support teams
anyway, or I'd hope so/
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
thi
e actually smart and
exponentially more reliable and robust than server based :)
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may n
lue 0
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 7:34 AM Noel Butler
wrote:
NFSv4, a dozen front ends to an EMC backend, with v4 we added "noac
lookupcache=none" in very early days - not sure if they are still
needed.
otherwise just like when using NFSv3, no problems, and never used
director.
On 22/05/2023 22:33, Marc wrote:
used director. real (hardware) load balancers are actually smart and
exponentially more reliable and robust than server based :)
because there runs no software on it, right
this statement here, shows what a clueless newbie you are
--
Regards,
Noel
- not blogs
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express wr
On 09/01/2016 22:06, mj wrote:
Compiling our own dovecot for production use sounds less appealing,
What's so un-appealing about building from source? It's then perfectly
matched to your system.
Admittedly I can build kernels faster than latest dovecot's, but that's
just the "make time"
On 22/02/2016 17:14, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 21.02.2016 19:10, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:03:15 +0100
Thomas Leuxner wrote:
[snip]
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/53cc71cae88ee81fd7eae47aed743496f8c884a2
[snip]
The PID-File seems to be expected under yet another sub-dir
o
On 02/03/2016 05:11, J. Niklas wrote:
On 01.03.2016 18:21, Dolf Schimmel wrote:
Recently I played around a little with cgroups where you can limit the
max number of processes per cgroup.
Could it be that, perhaps, you've stumbled upon such a limit?
Systemd does contain all services by default
On 06/03/2016 04:18, Robert Schetterer wrote:
for paranoid people, create you own repo
and for info dovecot had nice compiled from scratch to me in the past
too
The only way to use dovecot IMHO is by source, you build in what you
want and omit the junk (that some repo packagers want to incl
On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
James wrote:
On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> zfs set sync=disabled ?
Only if you are happy to loose data on power failure.
I don't know the actual setup, but if you have no UPC you
On 14/03/2016 09:59, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +
> James wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>&g
On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
and you've never seen these cause problems with FS? then you must be
a
newbie, in over 25 years I've seen it happen several times - yes even
after an apparent controlled shutdown.
Maybe you're doing something wrong then. because in my la
It seems its troll time again on this list, ohh maybe its Harry in
disguise... So I will play along, for today anyway :)
On 19/03/2016 18:11, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:37:04 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 14/03/2016 18:49, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
>&g
On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote:
Hello,
Sorry if I am off topic a little.
I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve
and manage sieve. Ideally with the roundcube webmail and managesieve
plugin
Better if it is in Europe or switzerland. I don't mind paying a lit
On 26/03/2016 17:04, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:34:34 +1000
Noel Butler wrote:
On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry if I am off topic a little.
>
> I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve
>
On 28/03/2016 01:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
I love this on your about page:
On 27/03/2016 3:14 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
I don't need to understand German law, thats what my Frankfurt lawyers
do, I'd trust our data privacy far more in our Frankfurt site, then I
would ever trust US or
On 31/03/2016 02:06, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hi,
Op 3/30/2016 om 5:34 PM schreef Juan C. Blanco:
Hello, I supose that a new version of pigeonhole is on the way because
version 0.4.13 does not compile against dovecot 2.2.23
This is the error that I get
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I..
On 31/03/2016 11:09, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Pigeonhole needs to be recompiled.
Regards,
Stephan.
hrmm it was, but process was ampersands so maybe somthing prior failed
and it did not complete make install, its late so ill look at it again
tomorrow.
--
If you have the urge to reply to a
On 26/06/2016 02:39, Michael Fox wrote:
The most crucial difference is that LDA is intended for delivering
email
to a *real* user.
Aki
Thanks Aki.
Pardon my ignorance, but why does it matter? In other words, what is
it that makes LDA better for a *real* user and LMTP better for a
virtual u
On 02/07/2016 19:16, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a pigeon sive running which directs some of my received mail to
the Junk folder. That works just fine. However, a couple minutes
later, it is moved to Deleted mailbox and deleted from Junk. At first
I thought my client was doing that so I shut dow
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:12 +0100, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> 30 Degrees Centigrade whilst 22 outside? Where the heck are you
> living ?
>
Indeed, at 22c I'm still wearing a jumper :) ... 30c is just right.
<>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:55 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/28/2011 2:51 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
> > Now the problem concerns outgoing messages. If I try to send e-mail
> > through out command (local user) or through out authentication
> > provided by a virtual user I get a error like:
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 14:02 +0200, spamv...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi..
>
> are there any proofen Methods to backup all mail ?
>
> shutting down dovecot and tar the hole dir?
> using rsnapshot?
>
> any hints / thoughts
>
> im running dovecot2 on freebsd
>
I assume it's only a single stand
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 17:12 -0400, Postmaster wrote:
> I'm not able to access the mailing list archives following the
> instructions here...
>
>http://www.dovecot.org/mailinglists.html
>
> using either IMAP or by downloading the mbox file.
replace www.dovecot.org with dovecot.org
the mir
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 16:05 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> On 17/08/2011 16:00, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> > Is there any way to achieve this with dovecot? Does anybody have another
> > idea smoothly force used to switch to TLS?
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe by sending them an email with a deadline for the
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 09:10 +0300, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> On 08/06/2011 01:32 AM, Ian Evans wrote:
> > I run a Dovecot 1.2.16 pop3 server and have just started using the
> > Thunderbird 5 email client.
> >
> > Thunderbird is set to leave the messages on the server unless they are
> > over 91 d
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 19:33 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> default_pass_scheme = PLAIN
Uhg i'll pretend I didnt see that :)
>
> According to the sample SQL configuration file "HA / round-robin
> load-balancing is supported by giving multiple host settings, like:
> host=sql1.host.org host
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 20:16 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:02:57PM -0700, Noel Butler wrote:
> > suggest, having just one master server, after all, dovecot and postfix
> > just need to read, not alter/update/insert etc.
>
> True; but the pie
Hi,
I've been away for a while, and the previous threads I stopped reading
because it makes reading War and Peace look more enticing.
Have you run in debug mode?
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I continue to be plagued with this error:
>
> Oct 25 10:49:18
*sigh*
As usual Stanley, you do not contribute anything constructive, only
trollish jibberish
Charles' advice however would be my next step, but at this point I think
it's a bit drastic.
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 02:33 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 2:34 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > J
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:33 -0700, Jack Fredrikson wrote:
> mailbox_command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f "$SENDER" -a
> "$RECIPIENT"
>
get rid of this ^ in postifx main.cf
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=dovecot ar
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 21:35 +0100, Miguel Tormo wrote:
> El Jueves, 24 de Noviembre de 2011 20:25:47 Timo Sirainen escribió:
> > I'm not sure if changing /etc/security/limits.conf helps. It's probably
> > only used by PAM when user logs in, so if Dovecot is started in system
> > bootup it's unlike
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 13:49 +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > Then the 'S' flag is added to the current Maildir filename without
> > losing any other changes.
> And this is supposed to work even over NFS? Great.
Absolutely, always has worked over NFS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
Have you tried using a modern kernel? that one is about 2 years old.
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
> Hey all, I upgraded some servers today from Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze,
> and after the upgrade I started getting dovecot crashes. I was on 2.0.13 but
> got these th
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 02:32 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Noel Butler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
>
> >> # 2.0.16: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
> >> # OS: Linux 2.6.32.36-xsserver x86_64 Debian 6.0.3
>
> > Have yo
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 00:49 +0100, Christopher Stolzenberg wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
> > am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
> >
> > :
> >
> >
> >>> Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you install
> >>> that is 2.0.16-friendly, and was this from Debian
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 23:18 -0500, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> I'm with Jim. Debian has served me well for years. This is just
> distro-bias. Sure, you need modicum more sense and hands on experience,
distro holy ways will outlast the real world holy wars, we each have a
distro we all stand by
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
> > 2011/12/22 Jim Knuth :
> >> am 22.12.11 00:15 schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg
> >>
> >> :
> >>
> >>
> Indeed; very many of us use Debian stable. Which kernel did you instal
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:42 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 22.12.2011 08:27, schrieb Noel Butler:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:08 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> >
> >> Am 22.12.2011 00:49, schrieb Christopher Stolzenberg:
> >>> 2011/12/22 Jim Knut
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:22 +0100, Cor Bosman wrote:
> > This also is not the kernel list, since updating to a kernel released in
> > the 21st century Cor's issue has gone away, so this thread is now rather
> > entirely pointless on the Dovecot list. So I'll my participation in
>
> Actually, it
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 06:31 -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:13:36 -0500
> Charles Marcus articulated:
>
> > On 2011-12-21 11:18 PM, Simon Brereton
> > wrote:
> > > It would be interesting to chart the number of threads caused by
> > > each distro. I don't know who would have the le
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 14:11 +, Alan Brown wrote:
> DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
>
>
another goose who think he's god...
if you dont like a thread, dont read it, especially since its been
marked as OT for past 10 or posts, ya moron.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:58 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
> a little bit more difficult in plenty of ways, but salt is the /solution/.
Agreed...
We use Crypt::PasswdMD5 -
unix_md5_crypt() for all general password st
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 21:06 -0500, Patrick Domack wrote:
> Quoting Noel Butler :
>
> > On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 20:58 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >
> >
> >> To prevent rainbow table attacks, salt your passwords. You can make them
> >> a little bit mor
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 03:26 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 02:59 AM Noel Butler wrote:
> > We use Crypt::PasswdMD5 -
> > unix_md5_crypt() for all general password storage including mail/ftp
> > etc, except for web, where we need to use apache_md5_crypt().
>
&
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 04:05 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 03:36 AM Noel Butler wrote:
>
> >
> > Because with multiple servers, we store them all in (replicated)
> > mysql :) (the same with postfix/dovecot).
> > and as I'm sure you are aware,
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 22:16 -0500, David Ford wrote:
>
> with multiple servers, we use pam & nss, with a replicated ldap backed.
public accessible mode :P oh dont start me on that, but luckily I'm
not subjected to its dangers...and telling Pascal bout Bourbon made me
realise its time to hea
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 07:47 -0500, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> then as late as possible in the startup sequence, run:
>
> - ntp-wait -v -s 1 ; start dovecot and postfix (and database servers)
I'll +1 that advice, I introduced ntp-wait sometime ago when dovecot kept
bitching, not a single glitch
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 02:13 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> There are several huge Dovecot+NFS setups. They use director. It works well
> enough (and with the recent fixes, I'd hope perfectly).
Not to mention other huge NFS setups that don't use director, and also
have no problems.
signatur
The purpose of any build scripts --sysconfdir is to tell the
configuration to build in a path for its binaries configuration file(s).
Dovecot 2.1.3, seems to insist that that directory is now /etc/dovecot/
ignoring --sysconfdir=/etc as in 1.2.x and previous majors before that,
is this a bug? if n
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:46 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.3.2012, at 15.26, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> > The purpose of any build scripts --sysconfdir is to tell the
> > configuration to build in a path for its binaries configuration file(s).
> >
> > Dovecot 2.
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 07:28 +0100, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
> :2012-03-22T11:55:Noel Butler:
>
> > perhaps it should be renamed then, given it violates the known normal
> > for SYSCONF dir, you've just created another form of --datadir
>
> Not rea
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 12:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.3.2012, at 12.44, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
>
> > Timo wrote:
> >> So the only way I can think of how to change this is to add another
> >> option to optionally remove the dovecot/ suffix from the directory, but
> >> is this really wo
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 03:50 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 24.3.2012, at 3.19, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> >> Yes, I was also thinking about that, but it's about removing the dovecot/
> >> suffix from other directories as well. That might be something worth doing
>
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 03:50 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 24.3.2012, at 3.19, Noel Butler wrote:
>
> >> Yes, I was also thinking about that, but it's about removing the dovecot/
> >> suffix from other directories as well. That might be something worth doing
>
Older versions of dovecot (all of v1) can under some circumstances
screwup and leave hung login processes, this more often than not occurs
if you have network issues, requiring a restart of dovecot to clear
them. Timo has apparently, IIRC, worked around this for v2.x and it
should not happen.
On
It wasn't sent to the list, it was direct, therefore it IS spam
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 16:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> well, but what is exactly your problem with people offering professional
> support for dovecot which is ON-TOPIC if this are not 20 mails each day?
>
signature.asc
Des
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 11:42 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 17 May 2012, at 10:56, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> > On 2012-05-17 10:20 AM, dovecot-20120...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
> >> On 17 May 2012, at 9:46, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >>> Tim is working closely with Timo, and I'm sure got Timo's pe
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 20:32 -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> Jeff Kletsky wrote:
> > Even with "good intent" the message in question is clearly in
> > violation of CAN-SPAM and Cal. Bus. Prof. Code Sec. 17529, of which
> > the sender was informed of when my server was accessed.
> ---
> And you ha
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 11:35 +0700, Tamsy wrote:
> All that noise because of one mail offering some paid support is so
one mail multiplies by all the miscreants in the world adds up to a
bucket load of crap
> unnecessary!
Actually, it has merits, because it is spam, had it gone to users@ or
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 06:48 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> basically a non-event. It must have been a really slow news day.
>
non-event? You wouldnt be saying that if certain other operators with
their products did that. I've seen you bitch and whinge about far far
far less over the years Jerry.
sig
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 09:43 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Almost every commercial product I know off does send unsolicited email.
Indeed, its why DNSBL's were developed
> There's a delete or report spam button/shortcut key for that. If it helps
> some other users, and more importantly the dovecot
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 08:25 -0400, Jerry wrote:
>
> Hell I bitch about a lot of things; however, that does not change the
> facts of the case. Only a subset of this list received the message in
> question -
Likely to see how many people bitched before the rest
> - and I was not one of them.
Firstly, posting the same message with a slightly modified subject wont
get you any answers any sooner, please refrain from doing this, it only
gives you a bad name and may have the opposite affect to one you desire.
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:06, Rod Treweek wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are str
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 02:49, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 16:28 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I noticed a problem after upgrading to 1.1.8
> >>
> >> Users that access to their mailboxes using webmail squirrelmail and HTTPS
> >> using HTTP s
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 08:28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:18 +0100, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> > Timo Sirainen:
> > > What exactly are they? I guess a global file that is served as a message
> > > for all users?
> > Right. With POP3 it is served once - after first user login after t
You need to update your sieve plugin
This question is best asked on ubuntu list, since these versions are
VERY old.
you could of course dpkg and remove them, and use the current stable
sources for both.
It is hard to support users of distros that persist in having ancient
"current" versions.
O
one more thing.
On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 01:09, John Reese wrote:
>
> protocol lda {
> log_path = /srv/mail/dovecot-deliver.log
> auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
> postmaster_address = postmas...@leetcode.net
> mail_plugins = cmusieve
>
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 16:55, Ivars Strazdiņš wrote:
> r...@mail:/etc/dovecot# cat dovecot-mysql.conf | grep quer
> password_query = SELECT password FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u'
> user_query = SELECT maildir, 1000 AS uid, 1000 AS gid FROM mailbox WHERE
> username = '%u'
> r...@mail:/etc/dov
1 - 100 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
