On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 16:04 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> > The gotcha is that you have two completely independent quotas with
>> > independent usage/limits for the INBOX and Archive namespaces. If that
>> > i
Sorry about the HTML.
I removed the string "-O2" from the /auth Makefile and, for good
measure, did make clean, make and make install for all of Dovecot.
Still, it crashed when trying to log in via IMAP (webmail). Core
dumped, here's the backtrace.
[snip]
Core was generated by `dovecot/auth
Thanks so much for that have tested in 2.0.16 release now and is working fine.
Mark
From: Timo Sirainen [t...@iki.fi]
Sent: 16 November 2011 18:25
To: Mark Zealey
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Port variable in LMTP userdb lookups?
On Mon
x09 (Seen Answered)
- ext 1 modseq: 1 (0100)
- ext 3 cache : 5516 (8c15)
- cache offset=5516 size=92, prev_offset = 0
- guid: 1321895282.XXXt,S=7399760,W=7496225
- date.save: 1322324286 (3e11d14e)
src idx record for this message contains pretty much all fields.
Thanks,
Mark
I'm not sure how I could tell.
We are also seeing this "MySQL server has gone away" issue in login
processes but it isn't causing an issue there as presumably dovecot
transparently retries rather than just giving up as it seems to in the
quota updates. Any thoughts or advice would be appreciated.
Mark
gets cached. I'm not seeing a compression at the
end as the tmp etc fields are still there (mostly don't have any yes fields in
our source caches) but as I say, because they don't have a last used date then
the none of them are ever actually used until the client
Correct we're not enforcing the quotas at present just want an easy way to
monitor everyone's mailbox usage.
Thanks for the patch; will it work ok against 2.0.16? if so I'll recompile and
give it a test today.
Mark
From: Timo Sirainen [t.
ather than conversion) caches could get relatively large?
Mark
From: Timo Sirainen [t...@iki.fi]
Sent: 08 December 2011 07:33
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Cc: Mark Zealey
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] using dsync to convert mailboxes looses caching options
On Thu, 2011-1
OK I'll test the header copying more fully. The reason we want to preserve
caching decisions is to avoid an IO storm when users log in to their mailboxes
after an sdbox upgrade so it would be great to be able to have some way to warm
caches.
Mark
With 2.0.16 hdr.xxx fields get copied fine (but of course without timestamp).
With the patch you provided they don't get copied whether using mirror or
backup & starting from scratch. I'm doing a Maildir to sdbox migration
otherwise don't think I'm doing
Thanks Timo, this patch applied clean against 2.0.16 just running it on live
for the past few minutes & seems to have fixed the issues.
Mark
From: Mark Zealey
Sent: 08 December 2011 07:14
To: Timo Sirainen
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: RE: [Dov
By the way, another bug I noticed with dsync is that when converting from
Maildir to sdbox is that the date.saved field is not preserved - it's just the
time when the first dsync command happened. Presumably it should be the mtime
of the Maildir message file
Mark
10-12-2011 08:27, Timo Sirainen yazmış:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:10 +, Mark Zealey wrote:
By the way, another bug I noticed with dsync is that when converting from
Maildir to sdbox is that the date.saved field is not preserved - it's just the
time when the first dsync command hap
10-12-2011 08:28, Timo Sirainen yazmış:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 14:45 +, Mark Zealey wrote:
With 2.0.16 hdr.xxx fields get copied fine (but of course without timestamp). With
the patch you provided they don't get copied whether using mirror or backup&
starting from scratch. I&
e the source cache's value for date.save if it is
available as ctime can be pretty unreliable?
Mark
Since upgrading from dovecot-2.1.rc1 to dovecot-2.1.rc3, some clients
are showing a .subscriptions file in the user's mbox path as a folder.
Some clients such as T'bird on Mac OS X create this file listing
subscribed mbox files. Other clients such as T'bird on Windows XP show
this file as a folder
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Timo Sirainen writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:17 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
>>> I moved some mail into the alt storage:
>>>
>>> doveadm altmove -u jo...@example.com seen savedbefore 1w
>>>
>>> and now I want to move it back to the
I'm running 2.0.17 and I'm still seeing a decent amount of "MySQL
server has gone away" errors, despite having multiple hosts defined in
my auth userdb 'connect'. This is Debian Lenny 32-bit and I'm seeing
the same thing with 2.0.16 on Debian Squeeze 64-bit.
E.g.:
Jan 12 20:30:33 auth-worker: Err
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Since upgrading from dovecot-2.1.rc1 to dovecot-2.1.rc3, some clients
> are showing a .subscriptions file in the user's mbox path as a folder.
>
> Some clients such as T'bird on Mac OS X create this file listing
> subscribed mbox files. Other
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2012, at 4.00, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> I'm running 2.0.17 and I'm still seeing a decent amount of "MySQL
>> server has gone away" errors, despite having multiple hosts defined in
>> my au
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Robert Schetterer
wrote:
> Am 13.01.2012 19:29, schrieb Mark Moseley:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On 13.1.2012, at 4.00, Mark Moseley wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm running 2.0.17 and I'm s
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:36:38AM -0800, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> Also another idea to avoid them in the first place:
>>
>> service auth-worker {
>> idle_kill = 20
>> }
>
> Ah, set the auth-worker timeout to less than the mysql timeout t
really want the sender to immediately see a rejection, you have
to use a 5xx status.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
ponse per long time (a week?)
for a given sender/recipient and won't include the original spam
payload. So, even though a spammer might use this backdoor to cause your
server to send messages to multiple recipients, the messages should not
have spam payloads and shouldn't be sent more t
how many compromised servers the spammer sends from. And
this assumes the spam is initially sent to multiple local users on
vacation and gets past your local spam filtering.
I don't know about you, but I have more significant potential
backscatter sources to worry about.
--
Mark Sapiro T
Just had a minor suggestion, with no clue how hard/easy it would be to
implement:
The %f flag in deliver_log_format seems to pick up the From: header,
instead of the "MAIL FROM:<...>" arg. It'd be handy to have a %F that
shows the "MAIL FROM" arg instead. I'm looking at tracking emails
through log
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 17:17 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>> Just had a minor suggestion, with no clue how hard/easy it would be to
>> implement:
>>
>> The %f flag in deliver_log_format seems to pick up the From: head
>>> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames)
>>>
>>> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP
>>>
>>> * Dovecot servers have been split based on their role
>>>
>>> - Dovecot LDA Servers (running LMTP protocol)
>>>
>>> - Dovecot POP/IMAP servers (running P
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 18.1.2012, at 19.54, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> I'm in the middle of working on a Maildir->mdbox migration as well,
>> and likewise, over NFS (all Netapps but moving to Sun), and likewise
>> with split LDA a
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 7:54 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 20:44 +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
>
>>> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo Frames)
>>>
>>> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP
>>>
>
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>On 10.1.2012, at 18.34, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Since upgrading from dovecot-2.1.rc1 to dovecot-2.1.rc3, some clients
>> are showing a .subscriptions file in the user's mbox path as a folder.
>
>Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/958
In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
related to the other:
1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn't be
exceeded? That is, even if technically possible, that I shouldn't go
over? Since we're 100% NFS, we've scaled servers horizontally quite a
bit. At
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 23.1.2012, at 21.13, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> In playing with dovecot director, a couple of things came up, one
>> related to the other:
>>
>> 1) Is there an effective maximum of directors that shouldn'
it seems to be doing this on transient errors
too. Is this an issue with the code or perhaps some setting I have missed?
Thanks,
Mark
been doing some massively parallel
testing previously and not seen this.
Mark
From: Timo Sirainen [t...@iki.fi]
Sent: 26 January 2012 12:31
To: Mark Zealey
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] auth-worker temporary failures causing lmtp 500 rej
Hi Timo thanks for the patch; I have now analyzed network dumps & discovered
that the cause is actually our frontend mail servers not dovecot - we were
delivering to the wrong lmtp port which we then use in the mysql query hence
getting empty records. Sorry about this!
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 13.1.2012, at 20.29, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> If there are multiple hosts, it seems like the most robust thing to do
>> would be to exhaust the existing connections and if none of those
>> succeed, then start a
easily add & remove servers.
Mark
Brilliant; I had read the director page in the wiki but didn't see it there & a
search of the wiki text doesn't show up the option - perhaps you could add it
or is there another place to see a list of director options?
Mark
From: Ti
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 12.1.2012, at 20.32, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>>>> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:17 -0400, Micah Anderson wrote:
>>>>> I moved some mail into the alt storage:
>>>>>
>>>>> doveadm a
il we manually do a force-resync on it. (speaking of
which, it would be great if force-resync also rebuilt the cache files if
there are valid cache files around, rather than just doing away with them)
Thanks,
Mark
06-02-2012 22:47, Timo Sirainen yazmış:
On 3.2.2012, at 16.16, Mark Zealey wrote:
I was doing some testing on sdbox yesterday. Basically I did the following
procedure:
1) Create new sdbox; deliver 2 messages into it (u.1, u.2)
2) Create a copy of the index file (no cache file created yet)
3
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Mark Zealey wrote:
> 06-02-2012 22:47, Timo Sirainen yazmış:
>
>> On 3.2.2012, at 16.16, Mark Zealey wrote:
>>
>>> I was doing some testing on sdbox yesterday. Basically I did the
>>> following procedure:
>>>
>>>
lmtp {
inet_listener lmtp_test {
port = 2450
}
}
protocol lmtp {
auth_socket_path = director-userdb
}
Thanks,
Mark
resync
the lookup table with the other directors or do a save/restore from disk) so
you are basically starting from scratch again which would be very bad in our
setup.
Mark
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>On 12/22/2010 08:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> It appears that there is some version of the Dovecot LDA that is
>> sending an RFC 3798 MDN rather than an RFC 3464 DSN to report
>> non-delivery to a user who is over quota.
>
>Fixed, bett
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> We've been collecting some stats to see what kind of benefits
> UP/SquirrelMail's IMAP Proxy in for our SOGo webmail users. Dovecot is
> running in High-performance mode http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess
> with authentication cachin
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Here's a list of things I've been thinking about implementing for Dovecot
> v2.2. Probably not all of them will make it, but I'm at least interested in
> working on these if I have time.
>
> Previously I've mostly been working on things tha
ports:
Feb 27 13:42:18 bats dovecot: auth:
GSSAPI(m...@ecs.vuw.ac.nz,130.195.5.88): Invalid base64 data in
continued response
Any suggestions on how to track down what specifically has changed and
how to fix it?
cheers
mark
: +
> 100.045413130.195.5.88130.195.5.13IMAP80
> Request: 2 LIST "" ""
> 110.045486130.195.5.13130.195.5.88IMAP122
> Response: 1 NO [ALERT] Invalid base64 data in continued response
now to figure out why its started truncating it.
cheers
mark
ds
1 AUTHENTICATE GSSAPI YIICiAYJKoZIhvcSAQICAQBugg[...]MpPurY7cZfRSEw==\r\n
and receives
+ YIGaBgkqhkiG9xIBAgI[...]iYoSGi9/uKVGyE64TAvkf25rCbFkNqk1D12g==\r\n
and carries on.
So what is it that differs in the two cases to cause dovecot to respond
differently?
cheers
mark
security layer
Mar 2 00:33:34 bats dovecot: auth: Debug: client out: CONT 1
BQQF/wAMAAwA47846FHFUOykdXinGYvMKwH///8=
Mar 2 00:33:34 bats dovecot: auth: Debug: client in: CONT
Mar 2 00:33:34 bats dovecot: auth: Debug: client out: OK 1
user=mark
and the failing kmail gives
Mar 2 00:38:
ork out the flow of the calls in and out of there.
> Are these working vs. non-working Dovecots in same or different servers?
All the working and non working connections are against a single dovecot
instance, just using different clients.
cheers
mark
ersion that the
latest was trying to use to 2.1.23 that was on the older systems got it
working again. When I get a moment I'll try and work out what
specifically changed.
cheers
mark
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:04:47 +, Steve Platt
wrote:
> I've set up a list of ciphers that excludes SSLv2 ciphers (and other
> weak ones) in the hope of preventing SSLv2 connections:
>
> ssl_cipher_list = TLSv1+HIGH : !SSLv2 :
> RC4+MEDIUM : !aNULL : !eNULL : !3DES : @STRENGTH
>
> I tried mak
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:07:24 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 16.3.2012, at 13.07, Mauricio López Riffo wrote:
> pop3_no_flag_changes=yes
Is it the same as pop3_no_flag_updates=yes ?
M.
All,
Below is my config. When I run dovecot from xinetd, I get these errors in the
log:
Mar 20 11:13:39 t4pserver2 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=::1, lip=::1, mpid=11624, secured
Mar 20 11:13:39 t4pserver2 dovecot: pop3(mark): Debug: Effective uid=500,
gid=100, home
08345 Mar 17 05:22 annphone
-rw-rw-r--. 1 root mail 127272960 Mar 18 18:28 backups.tar
-rw-rw-r--. 1 crimsonblues mail327563 Dec 3 14:38 crimsonblues
-rw-rw-r--. 1 mark mail 0 Mar 18 13:09 mark
-rw-rw-r--. 1 markphonemail 124147068 Mar 18 04:21 markphone
-rw-rw
ur if it
was started as a SERVICE, e.g. from the init.d script. So now the question is:
what is different in those two environments...?
Thanks, hope this clarifies things,
/Mark
-Original Message-
From: Stan Hoeppner [mailto:s...@hardwarefreak.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:42
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> For the last few days I've been thinking about my company and what it really
> should do, and as much as the current plan seems reasonable, I think in good
> conscience I really can't help but to bring up an alternative plan:
>
>...
I'm sl
how have old namespaces for old customers, new namespaces for new
customers (we are using sql login code so should be possible to do
something like this in theory I think?)
Thanks,
Mark
a way we can
somehow have old namespaces for old customers, new namespaces for new
customers (we are using sql login code so should be possible to do
something like this in theory I think?)
Thanks,
Mark
dovecot reconfiguration.
Mark.
On 20 Nov 2007, at 21:53, "Paul A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have server with multiple virtual domains and this server also
accepts
mail for the local domain.
I'm using postfix and have the following setup for a virtual
[EM
Switch to Exim4 for your MTA. It won't Append 2 files to the same
directory if it can see they both route to you.
Mark.
On 21 Nov 2007, at 08:50, Bjørn T Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:05:14 +0100 (CET)
Steffen Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
t; is not the same as the
ID you will get from your MTA in the Received: Header
If the IDs in the received header on your end do not match, that is 2
seperate deliveries so you will get 2 in your box.
Different mail clients can get around this by hiding dupe threads (mutt for
instance).
Mark
>>
>> A normal rsync to another server of the maildir and configs will work
>> fine. If you need to backup using windows or mac then a samba share is
>> the best bet.
>>
>> Mark
>>
> Links how to use rsync will be appreciated.
see
http://samba.an
I can not help with the error, but can tell you there is a few
conversion tools for mbox to maildir format. Have a search on google.
Mark.
On 23 Nov 2007, at 18:53, "Erick Perez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have a locking problem in a Centos 4.4 linux machine wi
I think you have answered your own question at the bottom!
Mark.
On 23 Nov 2007, at 10:12, Ingo Rogalsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I intend to use maildir Quota for measurement only, not for applying
restrictions. Therefore I defined rather high values. That's working
a
Why can't you have a lightweight MTA on the dovecot server that only
accepts from your primary MTA? That seems to be the simplest and most
reliable solution.
After all, its not like an mta is going to cost you anything!
Mark.
On 23 Nov 2007, at 08:02, "Brent Clark" &l
> will be able to access their mail the next second that the big server fails.
> Look at http://freshmeat.net/projects/imapsync
>
> It's just an idea... not the best way to do it I guess...
A normal rsync to another server of the maildir and configs will work
fine. If you need to backup using windows or mac then a samba share is
the best bet.
Mark
somebody have a solution for this problem
(pollsys) under Solaris 10?
Greets,
Mark
Mark Heitmann wrote:
>>/ >>/ Did you compile with Solaris's own LDAP library or with OpenLDAP?
/>>/ />/ I'm using iPlanet DS and Solaris's LDAP library.
/>>/ /
/>>/ People have had different kinds of problems with Solaris LDAP
/>>/ libra
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 10:22 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>/ On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:10 +0100, Mark Heitmann wrote:
/>/ > pollsys(0x08099448, 11, 0x08047B10, 0x) = 1
/>/ > fd=5 ev=POLLIN|POLLPRI|POLLERR|POLLHUP|POLLNVAL rev=0
/>/ > fd=7 ev=POLLIN|PO
n this mail machine have no problems
with the openldap installation ...
Mark
cause the
--with-ldap
flag has no directory option:
LDFLAGS=-L"/usr/local/BerkeleyDB/lib -L/usr/local/lib
/usr/local/lib/libldap-2.4.so.2"
Is there a smarter way to link with the right lib and ignore the solaris
one?
Mark
Here's how to work around it:-
In the LDFLAGS use:
LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB/lib -R/usr/local/BerkeleyDB/lib
-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib"
This works now very well, I'll keep this information in mind ...
Thanks a lot @all
Mark
why this is
not working, nor do How Tos.
Any help would be appreciated.
Mark Smith
why this is
not working, nor do How Tos.
Anyrhing remotely helpful would be appreciated.
Mark Smith
without
success (I can see the subfolders but no contents)and have tried running
courier-dovecot-migrate.pl witt he same result. I'd be grateful for any
advice.
Kind regards,
Mark.
Dovecote version: 1.0.rc15
/etc/dovecot.conf
log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log
info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot-info.l
to a minimum.
Kind regards,
Mark.
> On 12/16/2007, Mark Piekos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Dovecote version: 1.0.rc15
>
> this doesn't directly answer your issue, but if you're starting fresh,
> please use the current release version - 1.0.9 now, although the newer
OK,
I'll have another go with the latest stable version.
Thanks for the advice.
Do you think this is likely to have an impact on my migration issue?
Kind regards,
Mark.
> * Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> i would rather say "use the latest package
Have you tried to clear your index and cache files for this mailbox?
(dovecot. Files)
Mark.
On 17 Dec 2007, at 21:24, Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Whenever I try to access an e-mail in the middle (rather than at the
end) of
the mailbox, my mail-client (KMail) g
This is entirely client independent. Some clients would see this
automatically while others such as outlook will not. As far as I am
aware there is no way to push this from server side.
Mark.
On 25 Dec 2007, at 20:36, "Christian Flothmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Yes in 2003 this is what I have experienced with outlook. Outlook
express has actualy quite good IMAP support.
If I'm wrong about 2003 I would like to know where I was going wrong!
Mark.
On 27 Dec 2007, at 18:13, John and Catherine Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You mean o
hat does this just like
courier does?
I do something similar with a nightly cron job running a perl script.
There is no locking for Maildir, so you don't have to worry about that.
Some previous discussion on this list suggested that ctime might be
better than mtime.
Mark
, is there a place this is documented that I should
have found? I coulnd't find it in the wiki, and if there was more info on
it, I'd be happy to put something together for the shared mailboxes page.
Did you see this one?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes
Mark
Also it seems that dovecot should recover from the 'corrupt' mailbox
and fix it rather than just continuing to encounter the same problem.
Any ideas or advice?
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
der.com
That's right. The username in Thunderbird's server settings is just the
username. It is not your email address.
--
Mark Sapiro mark at msapiro net The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
processes simultaneously.
I have since added
pop3_lock_session = yes
to the dovecot configuration, and I have seen no further problems,
but it's only been 2 weeks since I made the above change so it's
too soon to know for sure.
--
Mark Sapiro mark at msapiro net The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 22:52 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
From now on, as messages are added to the mailbox by Postfix, fetchmail
keeps retrieving both old and new messages. i.e. even though dovecot's
log says del 1/1 (or del n/n) no messages are actually deleted fro
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 10:45 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Here's one additional piece of information which may or may not be
relevant. There are actually three users (and three separate mailboxes)
whose mail is being retrieved via POP3/fetchmail, but all three users
hav
mail" and "mail_access_groups = mail" or just
"mail_access_groups = mail".
Also, are the comments describing these in the example .conf file
correct, or are they reversed.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
socket:
type: listen
client:
path: /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
mode: 432
user: postfix
group: postfix
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 08:51 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> But this doesn't work. With "mail_privileged_group = mail" and
>> mail_access_groups unset, I get
>>
>> May 6 12:48:54 sbh16 dovecot: POP3(xxx): file_lock_dotlock()
ck_use_excl: no
mail_nfs_storage: yes
mail_nfs_index: yes
lock_method: dotlock
maildir_copy_preserve_filename: yes
Thanks,
Mark
1 exim exim 23 Jun 24 22:49 subscriptions
drwx-- 2 exim exim 2048 Jul 2 10:42 tmp
This looks like a bug to me; I will have a look in the source and see if
I can find anything, but I thought I'd send this email as you'll be able
to find the bug faster than I can.
Thanks,
Mark
t-uidlist" -ot "$HOME/Maildir/new" ]]; then
rm -f "$HOME/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache"
fi
(whenever a user logs in via imap we touch .lastlogin_imap, so we only
kill the cache file if the user is pop3-only and both the cache and
uidlist are older than the new directory).
Mark
a few of these this morning.
Mark
--
Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader
Product Development * Webfusion
123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk
This mail is subject to http://www.gxn.net/disclaimer
rd about our setup; we have the maildirs stored on an nfs mount and
deliver could be called on multiple heads at the same time for
deliveries - I suspect this is what was causing the problem. Our nfs
mount options are
rw,noatime,nodiratime,hard,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,tcp,nocto.
Running centos 5.1 on the boxes with exim.
Thanks,
Mark
201 - 300 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
