[Dovecot] 2.1.2 (pop3|imap)-login crash

2012-03-20 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi Timo, hi all, after upgrading my server (both backends and load balancer) to 2.1.2 (from 2.0.17), I'm getting a log of login processes crashed in load balancer. Log lines are like: Mar 20 10:05:45 mailgw-lb dovecot: pop3-login: Fatal: master: service(pop3-login): child 27764 killed with s

Re: [Dovecot] 2.1.2 (pop3|imap)-login crash

2012-03-21 Thread Luca Palazzo
It worked. We have no more sigsegv on *-login process. Thanks Luca Nella citazione in data Wed Mar 21 16:17:56 2012, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: Hi, On 20.3.2012, at 11.09, Luca Palazzo wrote: Hi Timo, hi all, after upgrading my server (both backends and load balancer) to 2.1.2 (from

Re: [Dovecot] 2.1.2 (pop3|imap)-login crash

2012-03-22 Thread Luca Palazzo
soon. On 21.3.2012, at 18.04, Luca Palazzo wrote: It worked. We have no more sigsegv on *-login process. Thanks Luca Nella citazione in data Wed Mar 21 16:17:56 2012, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: Hi, On 20.3.2012, at 11.09, Luca Palazzo wrote: Hi Timo, hi all, after upgrading my server (both ba

[Dovecot] 2.1.2 Corrupted squat uidlist

2012-03-26 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi Timo and All, after upgrading to 2.1.2 i'm getting a lot of these messages: Error: Corrupted squat uidlist file XX wrong indexid I did not have them before. Ideas? Luca

[Dovecot] dovecot-lda crash

2010-10-18 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi Timo and All, we had to revert back to LDA delivery instead of lmtp proxy (too buggy). We nare now experiencing process segfaults: [503564.305998] dovecot-lda[2415]: segfault at 48 ip b779e5b9 sp bfaf0ba8 error 6 in libdovecot-storage.so.0.0.0[b774b000+b9000] [503615.786468] dovecot-lda[2405]

[Dovecot] Maybe wrong quota recalculation behaviour on overquota delivery try

2010-09-02 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi all, we are experencing some, may be strange, slowness in our dovecot/postfix mail system. We have three dovecot 2.0.1 server with LMTP, POP3 and IMAP enabled. Three shared OCFS2 filesystem are used for mail storage. We have too a load balancer based on dovecot director in front of these thr

[Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line

2010-09-02 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi All, we are experiencing another strange problem after upgrading to 2.0.1 from 1.2. Many people's client aree-retrieving mail from server due to some problem with dovecot-uidlist file. Looking at log file seem that all file content is sometime duplicated and appended to the and of same fil

Re: [Dovecot] Maybe wrong quota recalculation behaviour on overquota delivery try

2010-09-02 Thread Luca Palazzo
calls. Is there any script/util in dovecot to fix filenames? Thank you. Luca On 09/02/2010 07:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 19:14 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: Looking at mbox servers log nothing seem to happen, but stracing lmtp process we can see stat system calls to all Ma

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line

2010-09-03 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi Timo and All, On 09/03/2010 04:44 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 19:21 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: >> Hi All, >> we are experiencing another strange problem after upgrading to 2.0.1 >> from 1.2. >> >> Many people's client aree-r

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line

2010-09-06 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi Timo, I tried the patch and duplicate uid are always there. Look at this: Sep 6 10:51:30 10.97.1.33 dovecot: lmtp(29909, xxx...@unict.it): save: box=INBOX, uid=133197, msgid=<20100906104944.Q92185@>, size=7414, from= Sep 6 10:51:30 10.97.1.33 dovecot: lmtp(29909, xxx...@unict.it): T8gcJIyp

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line

2010-09-06 Thread Luca Palazzo
Timo, please also check this output of lmtp process: stat64("/virtual1/unict.it/d///Maildir/dovecot-uidlist", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=44628, ...}) = 0 _llseek(42, 0, [0], SEEK_SET) = 0 fstat64(42, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=44628, ...}) = 0 fstat64(42, {st_mode=S_IF

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line

2010-09-07 Thread Luca Palazzo
K_SET) = 0 fstat64(17, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=14641, ...}) = 0 fstat64(17, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=14641, ...}) = 0 pread64(17, ""..., 4096, 14641) = 0 On 09/06/2010 04:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 11:11 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: Sep 6

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line

2010-09-07 Thread Luca Palazzo
Timo, just put the path in all three servers. I'm yes getting duplicates. May be they are caused by existent files? How may I check if patch is working fine? I'll look at results tomorrow, anyway. Luca On 09/07/2010 05:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:24 +0100, Timo Sirain

[Dovecot] xxxx-login: Error: open(proxy-notify) failed: No such file or directory

2010-09-08 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi All, just noted this error message. What does it mean? System seem to work fine but i get a lot of them. Luca

[Dovecot] LMTP proxying strategy with multiple recipient delivery

2010-09-08 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi Timo and All, how does Dovecot act when an MTA tries to deliver a multiple recipient message to a LMTP proxied system? Does it uses server affinity table for each recipient? I use lmtp_destination_recipient_limit = 1 setting in postfix to avoid multiple recipient delivery. Is it right? I

[Dovecot] LMTP proxy too many DATA output timeout (perhaps)

2010-09-10 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi All, we are getting a lot of this message from dovecot director. They seem to be too many. Backend servers do not log anything and postfix logs a lot of these errors. It seems that dovecot strategy handgling data output timeout when proxying LMTP is or too aggressive or may have some other p

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP proxying strategy with multiple recipient delivery

2010-09-13 Thread Luca Palazzo
Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 07:46 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: how does Dovecot act when an MTA tries to deliver a multiple recipient message to a LMTP proxied system? It also tries to forward the same message with one DATA and multiple RCPT TOs. Does it proxy TOs using

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP proxying strategy with multiple recipient delivery

2010-09-13 Thread Luca Palazzo
Timo Sirainen ha scritto: On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 07:46 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: how does Dovecot act when an MTA tries to deliver a multiple recipient message to a LMTP proxied system? It also tries to forward the same message with one DATA and multiple RCPT TOs. Does it proxy TOs using

[Dovecot] LMTP Proxy not logging users' IP

2010-09-13 Thread Luca Palazzo
Hi All, is there any way to enable logging of users' IP address in dovecot director host? It actually logs only: Sep 14 07:32:29 mailgw-lb dovecot: lmtp(17615): Connect from xx.xx.xx.xx Sep 14 07:32:29 mailgw-lb dovecot: lmtp(17615): Disconnect from xx.xx.xx.xx: Client quit Thanks Luca

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP Proxy not logging users' IP

2010-09-13 Thread Luca Palazzo
Sorry!! Just for forget this mail... I was too sleepy to make real questions.. Luca On 09/14/2010 07:35 AM, Luca Palazzo wrote: Hi All, is there any way to enable logging of users' IP address in dovecot director host? It actually logs only: Sep 14 07:32:29 mailgw-lb dovecot: lmtp(

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP proxy too many DATA output timeout (perhaps)

2010-09-29 Thread Luca Palazzo
8:33:04.522152 read(13, "t-profile&utm_content=3DV1_100420"..., 4096) = 4096 08:33:04.522358 read(13, ";\" valign=3D\"top\">>4096) = 1580 08:33:04.522520 read(13, "td style=3D\"color:#A7A9AC;font-si"..., 2516) = 2516 08:33:04.522680 read(13, &

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP proxy too many DATA output timeout (perhaps)

2010-09-30 Thread Luca Palazzo
: On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:18 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: we are getting a lot of this message from dovecot director. They seem to be too many. Backend servers do not log anything and postfix logs a lot of these errors. It seems that dovecot strategy handgling data output timeout when proxying LMTP

Re: [Dovecot] LMTP proxy too many DATA output timeout (perhaps)

2010-10-05 Thread Luca Palazzo
Timo, duplicates and empty emails are yet there. We had a lot of them today. Luca On 10/01/2010 10:43 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:33 +0200, Luca Palazzo wrote: Timo, I can also confirm that when this happens (connection drop after timeout) the mail is partially delivered