0xb7e6da98 in io_loop_run (ioloop=0x806c370) at ioloop.c:350
#11 0xb7e5b26a in master_service_run (service=0x806c2c0,
callback=0x805f800 )
at master-service.c:496
#12 0x0805f6da in main (argc=1752462689, argv=0x73616d2d) at main.c:358
This is Dovecot error or I do something wrong?
--
Len7hir
W dniu 2010-09-10 13:28, Len7hir wrote:
> I have version 2.0.0 and upgraded to 2.0.2 and after - this is happend:
>
> Raw backtrace:
> /opt/dovecot2/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0xb7e3425e] ->
> /opt/dovecot2/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0xb7e342b5] ->
> /opt/dovecot2/lib
W dniu 2010-10-14 17:53, Timo Sirainen pisze:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:22 +0200, Len7hir wrote:
>> This is scenario that cause segmentation fault in my Dovecot.
>
> Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/a3e40c6b14fe
This fix is not working property.
Now I ha
27;ve when set service_count = 1.
Feb 2 10:21:29 pp4 dovecot: pop3-login: (5052) Disconnected: Connection
queue full (no auth attempts)
--
Len7hir
This is also my problem. See this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg36356.html
Len7hir
W dniu 2011-02-04 18:26, Timo Sirainen pisze:
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 11:13 +0100, Len7hir wrote:
W dniu 2011-02-03 16:33, Kurt Hockenbury pisze:
Ok, we updated to dovecot 2.0.9, and we're still seeing the
"net_connect_unix(imap) failed" problem happen around peak login time,
9-
2.1130 .plt
672 1.8393 buffer_write
658 1.8010 __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx
614 1.6806 safe_memset
586 1.6039 pool_alloconly_malloc
559 1.5300 p_strdup
533 1.4589 hash_table_insert_node
I wonder why You use loops instead strlen, which is optimalised on every
platforms.
Redgards,
Len7hir
y You use safe_memset instead of memset?
Now this function have the largest impact in Dovecot performance.
Another on list is t_push.
Regards,
Len7hir
--- dovecot-2.0-pure/src/lib-mail/message-parser.c 2010-08-08
10:05:30.0 +0200
+++ dovecot-2.0/src/lib-mail/message-parser
In dovecot-patch2.diff
data = _stream->buffer + _stream->skip;
Should be: data = (unsigned char *)_stream->buffer + _stream->skip;
Sorry for this :P
--
Len7hir
W dniu 2010-09-01 17:25, Timo Sirainen pisze:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:23 +0200, Len7hir wrote:
And another problem. Why You use safe_memset instead of memset?
Now this function have the largest impact in Dovecot performance.
Really? I'd think it would be called very rarely since it s
call tree) that have
more than 2% of all oprofile samples in libdovecot.so.
p_strdup is on the list, but it is lower than before last optimisations.
As You see there is no other optimised functions :)
--
Len7hir
opreport -c -s debug -l -% -g -t 2 libdovecot.so -o libdovecot_profile
CPU: P4 / Xeon
main.c:250
If You want core file I can send, but maybe this is unnecessary.
--
Len7hir
12 matches
Mail list logo
