On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:59:52PM +0100, Pavel Dimow wrote:
>
> we have /var/spool/vmail/mydomain.com/u...@mydomain.com and I want a
> new server with version 2 to have
> hashed directory structure like /var/spool/vmail/mydomain.com/u/s/user
> I was wondering it f there is some better solution t
Am 06.03.2013 09:01, schrieb pvsuja:
Line #12 is
ssl_cert = doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
/usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf line 12: Unknown setting:
ssl_cert*
Please post your 10-ssl.conf file on Pastebin and add the link.
Greetings, Jan
Am 07.03.2013 05:26, schrieb pvsuja:
In proxy:
/mailproxy dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1 attempts in 2
secs): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, TLS,
session=<1pBG/03XogB/AAAB>
Wellas you see, your mail-client tries to speak PLAIN, so it
shouldn't work
Am 08.03.2013 07:08, schrieb pvsuja:
Through wireshark, I found the username and password is going in plain text
only to the server.
How will I enable starttls in ImapcProxy before any communication starts?
Mhh, well, communication encryption and password encryption are two
different things. I
he "Z" flag is missing in the filename.
Is that a bug in the plugin, or in dovecot?
Greetings, Jan
-
--- additional data:
>>> find .
./dovecot-uidlist
./dovecot.mailbox.log
./tmp
./cur
./cur/1362746783.M97516P2853
re is no Z-flag by default for
compressed mails. I think it should be added to the plugin, but maybe it
isn't possible.
Greetings, Jan
Am 14.03.2013 06:41, schrieb pvsuja:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for your response and Sorry for this late reply. I was out of
station.
And my question is why my mail client is sending the auth details in plain
text?
Configuration? I don't know which client you use, but in my Thunderbird
you can conf
Small correction:
Am 14.03.2013 06:41, schrieb pvsuja:
how will i make sure, auth is done after starttls only?
> In proxy:
> /mailproxy dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1
attempts in 2
> secs): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, TLS,
session=<1pBG/03XogB/AAAB>
Just a guess:
Is your dovecot-lda running as root? Because:
Operation not permitted (This
binary should probably be called with process group set to 8(mail) instead
of 1000(cryptodan))
this could mean it tries to become 8(mail) to be able to deliver, and
it's not allowed to?
MJ
dovecot unix -n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d
$(recipient)
I don't totally understand this stuff, but mine is different, and contains:
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DROhu use
, Jan
That's the old method, if my hazy memory is serving me half right
tonight, that will not permit recipient delimiter processing
To accommodate that suggest using -
-f ${sender} -d ${user}@${nexthop}
Ah interesting..! Is that perhaps why
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit=1
was needed, here..?
IMAP without
SSL/TLS or STARTTLS, see http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/IMAP
for more.
Can't say anything specific about squirrelmail to dovecot-proxy, is that
the full doveconf -n? Please add the full one, if possible from both
dovecot servers.
Greetings,
Jan
so every time the full attachments get downloaded and uploaded again.
Now the question is: Is LEMONADE supported by desktop-mailclients like
thunderbird or just mobile Clients? (Google said nothing to this, maybe
searched the wrong words)
I hope someone can help me with this.
Greetings, Jan
On 2010-02-17, Ed W wrote:
>
> Anyone had success using some other clustered/HA filestore with dovecot
> who can share their experience? (OCFS/GFS over DRBD, etc?)
We´ve been using IBM´s GPFS filesystem on (currently) seven x-series
servers running RHEL4 and RHEL5, all SAN-attached all serving t
that this works for you!
Greetings, Jan
# /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf
#
service auth {
unix_listener auth-userdb {
mode = 0600
user = dovemail
group = dovemail
}
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
Hi all,
Thunderbird has an option to detach attachments from (for example) sent
items. I've tried it, and it does not work, and also in the dovecot logs
I don't see anything interesting meanwhile.
Before looking deeper into this: Does anyone here know if this option is
known to work, or not?
07--
Nice!!
Andreas
On 10/04/13 11:50, mourik jan heupink wrote:
Hi all,
Thunderbird has an option to detach attachments from (for example)
sent items. I've tried it, and it does not work, and also in the
dovecot logs I don't see anything interesting meanwhile.
Before looking dee
Am 12.04.2013 19:33, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.0.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.0.tar.gz.sig
Everything now seems to be stable and working in v2.2, so I can finally
move onto developing great new interesting features for v2.3. :)
Tha
a great help if something doesn't work.
Have a nice weekend. :)
Greetings, Jan
sponse to this?
But 2.2 released only few days ago, maybe the repo-admin hadn't time to
change this, or my memory about this is wrong.
best regards,
Jan
I just upgraded one of our servers to dovecot v2.1.16 (ee), and am looking
into the stats feature. Am I interpreting the wiki correct in reading that
the "doveadm stats dump command" only returns statistics about IMAP
commands?
Is it possible to collect info about POP3 and LMTP commands also ?
Al
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
backup dsync destination a year (or two) ago, and got quite confused..
Don't quite remember the problems I had, but I did lose confidence in it
and d
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 29.4.2013, at 15.30, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
>
> > Is it possible to collect info about POP3 and LMTP commands also ?
>
> No. I think they would be pretty boring statistics, since with POP3 pretty
> much eve
Thanks, nice graphs. I've attached a graph over LMTP delays per minute as
seen from the postfix side on one of our servers. This includes delays
caused by both delivery to dovecot LMTP, and also LMTP communication
internally on the mailservers between postfix and amavis. Unfortunately it
says nothi
I just tried to migrate one of my users from maildir to mdbox using
dsync. My conversion script is checking the dsync exit code to know if
the conversion goes fine or not, and surprisingly dsync returned "0" at
the same time as it gave the error:
Error: Failed to sync mailbox .ta\ vare\ p
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:47:08PM +0200, Olivier Girard wrote:
> I'm trying to finish my dovecot setup but things are unclear for me.
>
> I want director proxying mapping to same server for LMTP and POP/IMAP
> connections. My authdb is LDAP and LMTP user are queried with mail
> adress (ldap mail
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:58:50AM +0100, Alan Brown wrote:
>
>
> One user has named all his mailboxes with leading hyphens.
>
> ie:
>
> -foo
> -bar
> -bazz
> Does anyone have the magic sauce needed to escape the - character?
No idea what you've tried, but maybe '--' is enough?
dovea
We have a quite large user base, with lots of bad folder names because
the mail folders was earlier accessible outside of dovecot. Now we're
running dsync conversions from maildir to mdbox for all users, but are
struggelig a bit with dsync not liking invalid folder names.
Before we convert a user
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but...:
On the dovecot enterprise release pages, only debian 6 compatibility is
shown. Are there any plans to support wheezy? (as 7 is stable now, and
we are running it...)
Regards,
Mourik Jan
Hi,
We have used Rick's tools to migrate from scalix to dovecot, and they
worked out incredibly well for us. Also Rick was very responsive to
questions and suggestions.
I consider it $35 USD well spent.
And that's the end of this commercial. ;-)
Mourik Jan
On 06/17/2013 04:3
Hi Timo, list,
Wheezy is supported already as well. I guess the web page needs updating.
Ah, thanks for the quick reply.
MJ
On 6/20/2013 10:54, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On the dovecot enterprise release pages, only debian 6 compatibility
is shown. Are there any plans to support wheezy? (as 7 is stable now,
and we are running it...)
apt-get source dovecot -b
will not work ?, if not then your enterprise is building on
dovecot is opensource, so why depend on someone that will not package it
for enterprise ?
get the tarballs. create a deb package. install, be happy
Ah right. :-)
But the advantage of using the http://www.dovecot.fi/ 'enterprise
dovecot' would be that they provide up-to-date versions of dovec
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:21:17PM +0100, Johnny wrote:
>
> I had thought SELinux would log something, but /var/log/audit/audit.log
> is blank...
Are you running auditd? I believe that if you're not running auditd, the
denials should be logged to the kernel ring buffer. Does "dmesg" show
any deni
I'd like to get the IP-address of the webmail-klient logged in my
maillog (for being compliant with coming data retention policies). I've
noticed that with login_trusted_networks pointing at my dovecot
directors, we get rip=client-ip logged on the backends. How is the proxy
providing this to the do
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:34:56PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> a ID ("x-originating-ip" "1.2.3.4")
Perfect, thanks! Feature request for SOGo filed:
http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2366
-jf
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:51:47PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Timo Sirainen skrev den 2013-07-03 22:34:
>
> >If backend has login_trusted_networks pointing to directors, then the
> >IP gets forwarded to backends as well.
>
> how does imap get ip from http ?
The webmail-server will use the HT
Hi,
we have some problems with users who report connectionproblems to
dovecot sometimes. According to the logs there are dovecot reloads at
this times.
Seems that a reload also causes dovecot to shut all imapconnections down:
Just a wile guess:
Could it have something to do with the "shutdown_c
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:08:57AM +0300, Birta Levente wrote:
>
> How can I convert all virtual mailboxes from maildir to mdbox?
> Manually, one by one, working, but I have a lot ...
I've converted around 4-500.000 users from maildir to mdbox by the
following on a server configured for using MDB
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:48:00AM +0200, Stéphane BERTHELOT wrote:
>
> mdbox_rotate_size = 128M
> mdbox_rotate_interval = 1d
> mdbox_preallocate_space = yes
> On mailboxes patterns with low incoming mail (< 100kb / day) this
> would waste much space. Of course I can decrease rotate size a lot
>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:42:43AM +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>
> And means a two layers cache of max 16 directories on the first layer
> and 256 directories on the second layer.
> The above allows millions of files storage and can benefit from all ext4
> lower kernel levels of compatibly rath
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 12:02:34AM +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> >
> > I use:
> >
> > mail_home = /srv/mailstore/%256LRHu/%Ld/%Ln
> "R" what for??
> I do understand a Lower case on the names and have seen the effect but
> how would R be helpful??
>
According to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/V
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:18:52PM +0200, Andrea gabellini - SC wrote:
>
> So you are using the same config I'm testing. I forgot to write that I
> use maildir.
I would strongly suggest using mdbox instead. AFAIK clusterfs' aren't
very good at handling many small files. It's a worst case random I
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
> I am running "mdbox_rotate_size = 100m" for approx. a year now on
> a small server (a handful of users, only). All mailboxes are around
> 1G each with a lot of attachments. I never had an issue so far.
How much space are your mdbo
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:57:40PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>
> 130m to 18m is 'only' a 7 fold decrease. 18m inodes is still rather
> large for any filesystem, cluster or local. A check on an 18m inode XFS
> filesystem, even on fast storage, would take quite some time. I'm sure
> it would
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >On 2013-08-26 2:58 PM, Michael Grimm wrote:
> >>As a very rough estimate I do estimate a 5% waste of space
> >>regarding deleted messages. But, my handful users are very
> >>disciplined in purging their deleted messages on a regula
Changelog from
2.2.7 didn't show changes on lmtp.
Best regards,
Jan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSe0cCAAoJENEKhqzzuxPlLOsH/iQLHuYXH/8HQJI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Additional note: Downgrade impossible because
http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/
didn't have the 2.2.6 packages anymore. :(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net
-> j...@larptreff.de
but I can't find a solution for relay-domains. (sending my mails via
relay-domain to dovecot)
Regards
Jan
Am 07.11.2013 09:47, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Jan Phillip Greimann wrote:
>
>> maillog: http://pastebin.com/WDGfEjdp
>
> are there s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 07.11.2013 10:32, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Jan Phillip Greimann wrote:
>
>> That's even the only one with lmtp-debug-messages, now all log
>> entries look like that:
>
>> http://pastebin.com
his a temporary
> workaround.
This workaround did it for me too, hope this is considered as a bug
and fixed soon.
> Regards, Michael
>
Regards,
Jan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEc
ogs (Fatal, Panic, Error, Warning).
>
> ... nor ...
>
>> You’ll also see the last 1000 error messages since dovecot
>> started with “doveadm log errors”.
>
> ... show any messages, none. This is 2.2.7 (775b1e025939).
>
> Regards, Michael
>
Same here, no errors
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:22:13PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Ah, I had actually been mostly just thinking about inbound SMTP features.
> It should of course support outbound SMTP as well, but I’m less familiar
> about what functionality would be useful for that.
Outbound is mostly the same
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:59:27AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> everywhere else you have sender-dependent relay hosts, RCPT dependent
> relayhosts
> and all sort of aliases which you *do not* want treated different between
> incoming mail from outside or a internal server and submission mail
>
Serverside private key probably doesn't protect against much, but a way for
users to upload a public key and automatically encrypt all messages when
received might have value. Limits exposure for messages at rest.
-jf
> Den 11. nov. 2013 kl. 15:21 skrev Peter Mogensen :
>
> *Christian Fels
My installation is only serving 1/10 of your size, but long time ago we
migrated off mysql for userdatabase, and over to LDAP. The MySQL data
source had issues (not dovecot related), and didn't seem like the right
tool for the job.
Initially we kept mysql as the authoritative database over our use
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:52:09PM +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> On 11/12/13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > My installation is only serving 1/10 of your size, but long time ago we
> > migrated off mysql for userdatabase, and over to LDAP. The MySQL data
> > source had issues
for a v2.2.8 stable-build on xi.rename-it.nl.
Best regards
Jan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSjKCEAAoJENEKhqzzuxPl/moH/32ob9kzWYrpBihUGYSx9p/V
Bk4z3I2FGc3Mvq
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Frerich Raabe wrote:
>
> I run a small IMAP server for a dozen guys in the office, serving
> about 55GB of Maildir. I recently became aware of the Zlib plugin (
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib ) and wondered
>
> 1. given that there is about zero C
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:47:33PM +0100, Frerich Raabe wrote:
>
> Interesting! What zlib compression level did you use? I figure even low
> levels would work rather well for plain text.
plugin {
zlib_save_level = 6 # 1..9
zlib_save = gz # or bz2
}
On 2007-04-26, Adrian Stoica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is this ?
>
We just saw the same fault today when we switched from courier
to dovecot on a large system today. The ~username/dovecot-uidlist
contained:
1 -1 0
and deleting this file plus it's lockfile seems to have fixed the
On 2007-05-09, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fixed it to log an error instead in such situations:
> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2007-May/008728.html
Great, thanks!
We just moved a large cluster (100k+ active accounts) from courier
pop/imap to dovecot (v1.0.0), and used the
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:50:16PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Was it courier-dovecot-migrate.pl then that created those broken uidlist
> files?
Yes, we cleaned these up manually.
> > deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): file mail-index-sync-update.c: line 841
> > (mail_index_sync_update_index
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:40:12PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > IBM's GPFS on linux, which is a shared disk cluster fs.
>
> So either there's some problem that only occurs with GPFS or it adds
> enough latency that a race condition somewhere can cause problems.
> Before v1.0 release I was ru
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:20:43AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> I haven't even started doing the index code cleanups. But I did write a
> small summary about it:
> http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-May/022591.html
Which got me thinking.. Do you think changing locking method might
help with
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:54:31AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> The biggest difference is between mmap_disable=yes and =no, but unless
> GPFS supports shared mmaps it's probably not a good idea to set that to
> "no".
I verified that mmap is supported on GPFS, and changed to
mmap_disable=no yes
While possible it probably overkill. A simple failover proxy is enough
unless he requires a active-active setup.
On 11.04.19 11:54, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>
> On 11.4.2019 11.44, luckydog xf via dovecot wrote:
>> Hi, list,
>>
>> I'm going to deploy postfix + dovecot + CephFS( as Mail S
Hi Joseph
On 07/24/2017 04:51 AM, Joseph Tam wrote:> You are essentially writing your own
backend by taking over
> authentication. You'll be accepting user/password inputs into your
> checkpassword executable, then use the LDAP API (or some other system...snip
> and source address, which will be
Out of curiosity how did you handle the courierimapsubscribed and
courierimapuiddb file name differences? Did you just rename them?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Richard G Riley
Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2008 13:30
Aan
That's actually quite a lot.
Consider you run 100k+ mailboxes (1GB each) and you would move to
Dovecot this will be a huge chunk out of your storage.
Is using dovecot index files really that much faster than running
":INDEX=MEMORY" ? Where could I find some benchmarks about this
mit.
But I am also curious what ":INDEX=MEMORY" will do with 100k users. How
much MB RAM will one IMAP session on average take? And will this be
removed from memory (or stay cached) when an IMAP session is closed?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo Sirainen [mailt
Thanks for the replies this cleared up a lot.
Right I think I will be using Dovecot for IMAP (less clients) with index
files and keep on using Courier for POP3 (most clients). According to my
tests this works OK on the same mailbox.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo
Herve probably uses the default Etch package.
I don't know who maintains the package: but it certainly is old.
Regards,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Charles Marcus
Verzonden: dinsdag 12 februari 2008 13:35
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTE
am.so.0.79
So it seems that configure is not checking the right places for the
libpam library? How can I tell it to look in /lib?
Also what does (auto) mean (--with-pam (auto)): it's confusing. It gives
the impression that, like (default), this option is added
'automatically'.
Cheers,
Jan
...
wow
How did I miss this?
I just noticed that my sources.list is seriously messed up. Therefore no
other 'pam' packages showed up in 'apt-cache search pam' (so no
libpam0g-dev).
I just fixed it; everything is OK now. Thx for the quick reply!
Cheers,
Jan
-Oo
Im still curious about this:
" Also, when configuring, what does (auto) mean (--with-pam (auto)):
it's confusing. It gives the impression that, like (default), this
option is added 'automatically'. "
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Enable mail process debugging. This can help you figure out why Dovecot
# isn't finding your mails.
mail_debug = yes
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Carsten Henkel
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2008 20:49
Aan: do
entations (100k+ users). Are there benchmarks
available; how well does it perform under heavy load (mails/sec)?
Cheers,
Jan
Thanks for the detailed answer (it helps)!
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 22 februari 2008 12:36
Aan: dovecot@dovecot.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve scalability
> Hi,
>
ts with regards to
forking and threading of the deliver binary?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Gabriel Millerd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zaterdag 23 februari 2008 4:01
Aan: Jan van den Berg
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Sieve scalability
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:5
Before you start Dovecot type this in you shell:
ulimit -n 65000
I don't know how the use of the 'unlimited' word works: maybe this is
only 1024?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Ralf Hildebrandt
Verzon
(default): sql(***, ***):
MD5-CRYPT(0lifant) != 'i3/S6ZswGSfbk'
Any way to make Dovecot use another (fallback) password scheme when the
default scheme isn't working?
Cheers,
Jan
CRYPT and MD5-CRYPT are compatible in pretty much all operating systems.
You could just make CRYPT your default password scheme and it'll work
for both.
I did not know that. But it works!
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verz
what auth_cache_size should solve right?
Am I applying the auth_cache_* variables wrong or is something else
wrong?
Cheers,
Jan
Aha ok!
I can see the cache hits and misses now: so that's fine.
But I will just keep using my imapproxy to reduce I/O.
Thanks Timo.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 27 februari 2008 17:38
Aan: Jan van den Be
(with indexes and auth_cache) performs
much faster and puts less load on our frontends and webmail app.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Timo Sirainen
Verzonden: donderdag 28 februari 2008 18:49
Aan: Andy Dills
CC: dovecot@doveco
uirrelMail as webmail app.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Charles Marcus
Verzonden: vrijdag 29 februari 2008 11:41
Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot NFS Indexes and IMAP Migration
Jan van den Berg, on
her emails will still get marked.
This only seems to happen with Outlook 2003 not with Outlook Express or
Thunderbird and only with new unread mail.
Any ideas why Outlook marks this mail for deletion?
Cheers,
Jan
look Junk email settings.
What is so specific about Dovecot that this happens? Could it be that
Dovecot and Outlook have a certain negotiation about this. Outlook sends
a message to Dovecot about a Junk email and Dovecot then moves this. Can
this be confirmed? Can I look for this 'negotiation'
FROM mailboxen
WHERE username = '%n'
Also in the main config I use:
mail_plugins: quota imap_quota
plugin:
quota: maildir
So I use maildir:storage in my config. However when I delete the
maildirsize (for testing purposes) it doesn't get automatically
recreated? According to the Wiki it should right?
Cheers,
Jan
ka-05): Quota root QUOTA: Invalid
rule: maildir:storage=10M:ignore=Spam e-mail
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Jan van den Berg
Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 13:40
Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
Onderwerp: [Dovecot] Maildi
Of course the rule is wrong:
":ignore=Spam\ e\-mail" shouldn't be in there.
I fixed it.
But still; why isn't the maildirsize being recreated when it's not
there?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
J
quota. Or is it the SM
implementation that is wrong and are there any workarounds available?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jan van den Berg
Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 14:53
Aan: Jan van den Berg; Dovecot Mailing List
Onderwerp: RE: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)
Wow,
Formulating the problem for the maillist really helps my find the answer
myself :)
quota_rule=maildir:storage=10M
quota_rule2=Trash:storage=8M
should be
quota_rule=*:storage=10M
quota_rule2=Trash:storage=8M
Now it works!
(Also maildirsize gets created automatically now).
Cheers,
Jan
Hi Charles,
Just for testing of course.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Charles Marcus
Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 16:52
Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build
On 3/10
e (I am not the
only user).
Cheers,
Jan
v. to debug.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Patrick Nagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 11:01
Aan: Jan van den Berg
CC: 'Dovecot Mailing List'
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + getting new
headers
-B
m not sure what to look for in these files.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jan
van den Berg
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 11:23
Aan: 'Dovecot Mailing List'
CC: 'Patrick Nagel'
Onderwerp: Re: [
Hi,
Well I enabled verbose debugs and all but there isn't anything interesting
in those logs...
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Patrick Nagel
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 12:17
Aan: Jan van den Berg
CC: &#x
301 - 400 of 462 matches
Mail list logo
